Matthew R. Perry

Archive for June 2006

Possible missions trip to Trinidad in January ‘07 — please pray

In Missions, Trinidad & Tobago on June 28, 2006 at 10:38 pm

td-lgflag.gifGod has placed a huge burden on my heart for the country of Trinidad and Tobago.  I believe that God has opened a great door for our church to do some construction work at the Mount Beulah Evangelical Baptist Church in Point Fortin from 23-31 January 2007.  The team will be called COMET 2007 (Christians On-Mission Engaging Trinidad).  Plus, I have been asked to do a Family Life Conference down there as well.

I’m asking you to pray for the following:

  • Six people have already committed to go.  Please pray that God would raise the finances necessary:  Approx. $750 for plane tickets, plus another $100 for extra money for emergencies. (I must say, God has already provided the finances for three of the six to go — He’s already at work!)
  • We are planning on tiling the church sanctuary, which we estimate will cost around $3000-3500.  Please pray that somehow, someway God will provide those finances.
  • That hearts and lives would be changed by God’s sovereign grace — both in Trinidad and even some of our own guys.  Who knows what God might do through them?

I covet your prayers, but if you are able to help with our finances, please send whatever help you can to:

Boone’s Creek Baptist Church
ATTN:  COMET 2007
185 N. Cleveland Rd.
Lexington, KY 40509

Thank you and may God bless you!

Possible missions trip to Trinidad in January ‘07 — please pray

In Missions, Trinidad & Tobago on June 28, 2006 at 10:38 pm

td-lgflag.gifGod has placed a huge burden on my heart for the country of Trinidad and Tobago.  I believe that God has opened a great door for our church to do some construction work at the Mount Beulah Evangelical Baptist Church in Point Fortin from 23-31 January 2007.  The team will be called COMET 2007 (Christians On-Mission Engaging Trinidad).  Plus, I have been asked to do a Family Life Conference down there as well.

I’m asking you to pray for the following:

  • Six people have already committed to go.  Please pray that God would raise the finances necessary:  Approx. $750 for plane tickets, plus another $100 for extra money for emergencies. (I must say, God has already provided the finances for three of the six to go — He’s already at work!)
  • We are planning on tiling the church sanctuary, which we estimate will cost around $3000-3500.  Please pray that somehow, someway God will provide those finances.
  • That hearts and lives would be changed by God’s sovereign grace — both in Trinidad and even some of our own guys.  Who knows what God might do through them?

I covet your prayers, but if you are able to help with our finances, please send whatever help you can to:

Boone’s Creek Baptist Church
ATTN:  COMET 2007
185 N. Cleveland Rd.
Lexington, KY 40509

Thank you and may God bless you!

How Many Christians Does It Take to Change a Light Bulb? (Humor)

In Church Life, Humor on June 27, 2006 at 6:52 pm

Charismatic:  Only 1 – Hands are already in the air.

Pentecostal:  10 – One to change the bulb, and nine to pray against the spirit of darkness.

Presbyterians:  None – Lights will go on and off at predestined times.

Roman Catholic:
  None – Candles only. (Of guaranteed origin of course.)

Baptists:  At least 15 – One to change the light bulb, and three committees to approve the change and decide who brings the potato salad and fried chicken.

Episcopalians:  3 – One to call the electrician, one to mix the drinks, and one to talk about how much better the old one was.

Mormons:  5 – One man to change the bulb, and four wives to tell him how to do it.

Unitarians:  We choose not to make a statement either in favor of or against the need for a light bulb. However, if in your own journey you have found that light bulbs work for you, you are invited to write a poem or compose a modern dance about your light bulb for the next Sundayervice, in which we will explore a number of light bulb traditions, including incandescent, fluorescent, 3-way, long-life and tinted, all of which are equally valid paths to luminescence.

Methodists:  Undetermined – Whether your light is bright, dull, or completely out, you are loved. You can be a light bulb, turnip bulb, or tulip bulb. Bring a bulb of your choice to the Sunday lighting service and a covered dish to pass.

Nazarene:  6 – One woman to replace the bulb while five men review church lighting policy.

Lutherans:  None – Lutherans don’t believe in change.

Amish:  What is a light bulb?

Gimme a V… Gimme a B … Gimme an S — what does it spell?

In Church Life on June 26, 2006 at 1:14 am

arcticedge_colorlogo.jpgThis week, our church will hold our annual Vacation Bible School. We will be using the LifeWay curriculum Arctic Edge: Where Adventure Meets Courage. This is by far the biggest outreach event of the summer for our church. We pray that God through His sovereign grace will draw many children to Himself through Jesus Christ.

Are any of you involved with Vacation Bible School this summer? If so, what do you think? How was it?

The “Other” Holiday Season (James Clymer, Constitution Party)

In Culture, Patriotic Days on June 24, 2006 at 11:28 pm

From the desk of James N. Clymer
Constitution Party National Chairman

It has become customary to refer to the period from Thanksgiving week through New Year's Day as the "holiday season," and with good reason. Many major holidays, including Christmas and Hanukkah, are clustered in that six-week span. With the passage of time, the holiday season has expanded, with the first Christmas decorations sometimes appearing before Halloween, and the holiday shopping season becoming the lynchpin supporting much of the entire retail sector. I enjoy Christmas and Thanksgiving as much now as I ever did as a boy, and am certain our culture would be immeasurably impoverished without them.

There is, however, a second holiday season, a span of five weeks in late spring and early summer when we observe no less than three holidays, all of them patriotic in nature, but only one of which is still celebrated in a way that our ancestors would remotely recognize.

The first, the "Thanksgiving" if you will, of the patriotic holiday season, is Memorial Day, which originated in May 1868 as "Decoration Day," in honor of those who fell in the War Between the States. After World War I, the holiday was expanded to honor all of America's war dead, and in 1971, it was made into a national holiday. Once upon a time, Americans honored Memorial Day with parades, visits to cemeteries, and other commemorative events. Nowadays, unfortunately, very few Americans under fifty see Memorial Day as anything more than a paid holiday and an excuse for a barbecue or a weekend camping trip.

Two weeks after Memorial Day, on June 14th, falls the almost-forgotten Flag Day. On this day in 1777, the standard that evolved into our modern-day stars and stripes was officially countenanced by the Continental Congress. It was first observed in 1877 on the hundredth anniversary of our flag's creation. Since then various U.S. Presidents, including Woodrow Wilson and Harry S. Truman, have given Flag Day national recognition. As reverence for the flag has diminished, so too interest in Flag Day has waned, although many patriotic organizations and individuals still observe the holiday. My home state of Pennsylvania, in fact, has made Flag Day a legal holiday!

Finally, on July 4th we celebrate our independence, although the date marks only the signing of the Declaration of Independence and not victory over Great Britain when our independence became an established fact. Independence Day is still marked by parades, fireworks, and other patriotic activities, all of which prove that love of country is alive and well in the United States of America.

It is unfortunate that we have so willingly allowed our independence to be compromised by membership in organizations like the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, NAFTA, and the International Monetary Fund, to mention but a few. The modern web of international governing bodies, all of which are designed to be way-stations on the road to world government, are often touted as enhancing our "interdependence." This they certainly do. However, it's worth pointing out that interdependence, unlike independence, is merely a form of dependence, the very antithesis of what our Founders wished for our nation. America is dependent on outside powers – for oil, manufacturing, borrowed money, and many other things – only to the extent that she chooses to be so. The assets of this great land are such that, if we wished, we could be self-sufficient for all of our essential needs.

Certainly the dead we honor on Memorial Day did not make the supreme sacrifice in the hope that America would someday become dependent on foreign powers. The flag we honor on Flag Day is not the standard of the United Nations or any other international body. And the independence we celebrate in early July presupposes dependence only on God, the grantor of our Rights.

May we of the Constitution Party all recommit our lives to honoring our country and the sacrifices of our forefathers, and to upholding the principles that have made America great during this, the "other" holiday season.

The “Other” Holiday Season (James Clymer, Constitution Party)

In Culture, Patriotic Days on June 24, 2006 at 11:28 pm

From the desk of James N. Clymer
Constitution Party National Chairman

It has become customary to refer to the period from Thanksgiving week through New Year's Day as the "holiday season," and with good reason. Many major holidays, including Christmas and Hanukkah, are clustered in that six-week span. With the passage of time, the holiday season has expanded, with the first Christmas decorations sometimes appearing before Halloween, and the holiday shopping season becoming the lynchpin supporting much of the entire retail sector. I enjoy Christmas and Thanksgiving as much now as I ever did as a boy, and am certain our culture would be immeasurably impoverished without them.

There is, however, a second holiday season, a span of five weeks in late spring and early summer when we observe no less than three holidays, all of them patriotic in nature, but only one of which is still celebrated in a way that our ancestors would remotely recognize.

The first, the "Thanksgiving" if you will, of the patriotic holiday season, is Memorial Day, which originated in May 1868 as "Decoration Day," in honor of those who fell in the War Between the States. After World War I, the holiday was expanded to honor all of America's war dead, and in 1971, it was made into a national holiday. Once upon a time, Americans honored Memorial Day with parades, visits to cemeteries, and other commemorative events. Nowadays, unfortunately, very few Americans under fifty see Memorial Day as anything more than a paid holiday and an excuse for a barbecue or a weekend camping trip.

Two weeks after Memorial Day, on June 14th, falls the almost-forgotten Flag Day. On this day in 1777, the standard that evolved into our modern-day stars and stripes was officially countenanced by the Continental Congress. It was first observed in 1877 on the hundredth anniversary of our flag's creation. Since then various U.S. Presidents, including Woodrow Wilson and Harry S. Truman, have given Flag Day national recognition. As reverence for the flag has diminished, so too interest in Flag Day has waned, although many patriotic organizations and individuals still observe the holiday. My home state of Pennsylvania, in fact, has made Flag Day a legal holiday!

Finally, on July 4th we celebrate our independence, although the date marks only the signing of the Declaration of Independence and not victory over Great Britain when our independence became an established fact. Independence Day is still marked by parades, fireworks, and other patriotic activities, all of which prove that love of country is alive and well in the United States of America.

It is unfortunate that we have so willingly allowed our independence to be compromised by membership in organizations like the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, NAFTA, and the International Monetary Fund, to mention but a few. The modern web of international governing bodies, all of which are designed to be way-stations on the road to world government, are often touted as enhancing our "interdependence." This they certainly do. However, it's worth pointing out that interdependence, unlike independence, is merely a form of dependence, the very antithesis of what our Founders wished for our nation. America is dependent on outside powers – for oil, manufacturing, borrowed money, and many other things – only to the extent that she chooses to be so. The assets of this great land are such that, if we wished, we could be self-sufficient for all of our essential needs.

Certainly the dead we honor on Memorial Day did not make the supreme sacrifice in the hope that America would someday become dependent on foreign powers. The flag we honor on Flag Day is not the standard of the United Nations or any other international body. And the independence we celebrate in early July presupposes dependence only on God, the grantor of our Rights.

May we of the Constitution Party all recommit our lives to honoring our country and the sacrifices of our forefathers, and to upholding the principles that have made America great during this, the "other" holiday season.

The Prayer of the Consistent Synergist (Reformation Theology)

In Church Life, Theology on June 24, 2006 at 2:59 pm

The Reformation Theology blog has a great post on the "Prayer of the Consistent Synergist."  Synergism is "…the doctrine that there are two efficient agents in regeneration, namely the human will and the divine Spirit, which, in the strict sense of the term, cooperate. This theory accordingly holds that the soul has not lost in the fall all inclination toward holiness, nor all power to seek for it under the influence of ordinary motives."  This gives some power of salvation to the human rather than salvation being solely "of the Lord" (Jonah 2:9).

I also noticed in the comments section how a synergist would sing Amazing Grace.  It is as follows:

Amazing grace, how sweet the sound,
My choice saved me!
I once was lost, but found my way,
Was partially vision-impared, but now am healed.

The Lord has promised good to me,
My action, His hope secures!
He shall my sheild and portion be,
So long as I don't lose my salvation.

Through many dangers, toils, and snares,
I have already come,
Twas my faithfulness that brought me safe thus far,
And I'll bring myself home.

A Southern Baptist Looks at the Doctrine of Election

In Theology on June 23, 2006 at 6:38 pm

The late Ernest Reisinger writes a very compelling and very biblical look at what I believe is the blessed doctrine of election (also known as the perseverance of the saints).  Click here to read.  You'll be blessed.

Was the SBC Conservative Resurgence Necessary? You Bet!!

In SBC, Theology on June 23, 2006 at 2:55 am

Dr. R. Albert Mohler, Jr., President of Southern Seminary, has a new blog dealing with issues pertaining to the SBC entitled Conventional Thinking.  In one entry, he gives some good reasons why the conservative resurgence in the SBC was entirely warranted and necessary.  Click here to read the entry and if you are a Southern Baptist, please bookmark this blog — it will be quite helpful in understanding all things SBC.

Congratulations to Frank Page, the new SBC President

In Church Life, SBC on June 14, 2006 at 2:05 am

Our family is having a wonderful time at the Southern Baptist Convention Annual Meeting here in Greensboro, NC.  It is truly a study in cooperation and parliamentary procedure — not to mention a great way to catch up on all the SBC entities.  The fellowship is nice as well.  I have had the chance to see people I haven't seen in years!  The high point in that aspect was seeing Chris Whaley and his family.  Chris serves as pastor of the First Baptist Church of Longwood, FL, and was very instrumental in me starting out in the ministry in the early 1990s.  

Special congratulations to Frank Page.  Although I voted for Jerry Sutton, it was clear that the other nominees jumped on the fact that Ronnie Floyd's church gave only 0.27% of their annual budget to the Cooperative Program.  Frank Page's church gives over 12%. 

The best and the worst lines of the convention came from Frank Page's nominator, Forrest Pollock, pastor of Bell Shoals Baptist Church in Brandon, Fla..  The best was this: "My father could not spell SBC President without the letters 'CP'." 

But he also gave the worst, as noted, "This vote is not about theology, but methodology."  Are they mutually exclusive?  To most Southern Baptists, they must be.  Theology drives everything.  If theology is not driving your methodology, I'm not interested in your methodology. 

More tomorrow (hopefully). 

Go Soca Warriors!

In Trinidad & Tobago on June 10, 2006 at 9:19 pm

td-lgflag.gif

Trinidad & Tobago held powerhouse Sweden to no goals. Their goalie made six or seven unbelievable stops as the Soca Warriors held Sweden to a 0-0 draw, gaining one point and are tied for second in the Group B of the World Cup. I watched the majority of the match. Great defense!

De-Soca-Warriors.jpg

I’m a soccer fan for the next month!

In Uncategorized on June 10, 2006 at 3:57 pm

The World Cup begins.  Soccer is very close to me this time of year because of the death of my nephew, Gray Griffin.  Gray was killed in an auto accident in October of 2002 at the age of 18.  He was the captain of the 16-17 USA World Cup team and could very likely have been on the World Cup team this year. 

I say that in light of the Sports Illustrated article in this past week's magazine about our team.  You will read about how back in 1999 the US best 16 and 17 year old soccer players went to school and trained in Bradenton, Florida.  Gray was a part of that experiment to try and get the USA among the elite.  Landon Donovan, DeMarcus Beasley and others were down there with Gray and now are the main stars of our World Cup team.  I miss you, Gray.  I'll be thinking about you when the USA takes the pitch.

Also, I am a big Trinidad and Tobago fan and the Soca Warriors (their national team) made it to the World Cup for the first time in their history.  When they beat Bahrain on November 16 to qualify for the World Cup, their Prime Minister immediately declared a national holiday!  They are five minutes away from starting their first match against Sweden and its on ABC.  So if you'll excuse me, I'm going to watch the Soca Warriors and hope there is a mammoth upset in the works.   Either way, they are just happy to be there.  If they beat Sweden — look out!

I’m a soccer fan for the next month!

In Uncategorized on June 10, 2006 at 3:57 pm

The World Cup begins.  Soccer is very close to me this time of year because of the death of my nephew, Gray Griffin.  Gray was killed in an auto accident in October of 2002 at the age of 18.  He was the captain of the 16-17 USA World Cup team and could very likely have been on the World Cup team this year. 

I say that in light of the Sports Illustrated article in this past week's magazine about our team.  You will read about how back in 1999 the US best 16 and 17 year old soccer players went to school and trained in Bradenton, Florida.  Gray was a part of that experiment to try and get the USA among the elite.  Landon Donovan, DeMarcus Beasley and others were down there with Gray and now are the main stars of our World Cup team.  I miss you, Gray.  I'll be thinking about you when the USA takes the pitch.

Also, I am a big Trinidad and Tobago fan and the Soca Warriors (their national team) made it to the World Cup for the first time in their history.  When they beat Bahrain on November 16 to qualify for the World Cup, their Prime Minister immediately declared a national holiday!  They are five minutes away from starting their first match against Sweden and its on ABC.  So if you'll excuse me, I'm going to watch the Soca Warriors and hope there is a mammoth upset in the works.   Either way, they are just happy to be there.  If they beat Sweden — look out!

Do You Know Him? (Philippians 3:1-11)

In Devotional, Uncategorized on June 5, 2006 at 12:00 pm
 

Do You Know Him?

What To Consider Before Going On-Mission

Philippians 3:1-11

Commissioning Service for our WorldChangers 2006 Team

(You may listen to this sermon via RealAudio at http://www.boonescreekchurch.com or by clicking here.) 

 

Introduction

 

This morning, we praise God for the team He has raised from our youth and adults as they go on-mission to Moberly, Missouri.  This makes the seventh year that our youth have worked with either WorldChangers or Kentucky Changers in doing missions work in the name of Christ.  This morning, we also praise God for Eric Masters, Anthony Varble and the staffers at the Boone’s Creek Camp who will minister to middle and high school students.  What a special day this is to see so many young people ready to step out and make a visible difference in our world for the name of Christ.

 

When I first went into the pastorate in 1999 and even in the ministry back in 1992, I remember that white-hot passion I had to make Christ known to whoever would hear.  Yet, as we look at the Apostle Paul, we see throughout his entire ministry he desired to make Christ known — but he also knew that of critical importance for his own life and ministry was to know Christ. 

 

Do you know Him?  Not know about Him — as if you were simply looking at His resume?  I mean, do you know Him?  What does that mean?

 

1.                  To know Christ means that we engage in the worship of God.

 

But whatever gain I had, I counted as loss for the sake of Christ.  Indeed, I could everything as loss for the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord.  For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things and count them as rubbish, in order that I may gain Christ (Philippians 3:7-8). 

 

Paul here says, “All that I had — all that was to my profit is now in the loss column.   And now what was in my loss column is now to my gain.”  All that matters is knowing Christ Jesus — to him, that was of the utmost worth and treasure to him.  He compared  all that used to be in the profit column, all that used to be treasure to Him as ‘rubbish.’ 

 

Rubbish here is pretty strong language.  Rubbish comes from the Greek word that could also mean dung, manure, even excrement.  With that type of waste, it not only describes the substance, but also the content and how you want it out!

 

I have four children:  a five-year-old, a two –year-old and twin eight month old boys.  My wife could tell you better than I that it is nothing for us to use 20 diapers a day between our three youngest.  One thing about it is that you do not want those diapers hanging around — even our handy dandy Diaper Genie won’t help out that way.  You want it out of the house!  It’s of no use to you and it is offensive!  You want it gone.

 

This is the essence of worship, dear friends, is that you treasure Christ above all.  In fact, the word ‘worship’ comes from the Old English woerthscipe with denotes worthiness, respect, reverence.  For Paul, Jesus Christ was of “surpassing worth.”  Just knowing him brought joy to his heart that knew no bounds.  A.W. Tozer put it so well: 

 

“What is worship? Worship is to feel in your heart and express in some appropriate manner a humbling but delightful sense of admiring awe and astonished wonder and overpowering love in the presence of that most ancient Mystery, that Majesty which philosophers call the First Cause, but which we call Our Father Which Are in Heaven.”

 

I believe this is why Paul starts the conclusion of this letter that we as Christians are to “rejoice in the Lord.”  This phrase comes up again in Philippians 4:4 in a two-fold manner, where Paul says, “Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, Rejoice” (Philippians 4:4).  Since Paul repeats that admonition to rejoice, we must not neglect nor take for granted the object of our joy — which also happens to be the object of our worship!  We rejoice in the Lord.  This phrase is key through out the entire passage — our joy, our treasure, and our worship must center on Jesus Christ our Lord. 

 

  

2.                  To know Christ means that we experience the true righteousness of God.

 

Philip. 3:9

    And be found in him, not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but that which comes through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God that depends on faith—

 

Paul here makes a distinction between false righteousness and true righteousness.  And as we ponder Jesus’ words about how blessed we are when we hunger and thirst for righteousness, we have to ask, what type of righteousness do we hunger after?  Is it a righteousness that we can look at in our own thoughts and activities and words and say, “See, I’m righteous!  Look what at what I did.  Look at what I said!” 

 

Why this admonition?  In the very next verse, Paul unloads on a group known as the Judaizers who kept preaching what I call a Christ-Plus religion.  Religions and cults practice this all across the world and have all throughout history.  In essence, it means that you bring something to the table to contribute to your salvation.  These Judaizers preached that you must trust Christ, but still keep all the Jewish rituals and sacrifices and even hold to the ritual of circumcision.

 

It must be said that the worship in which the Judaizers were engaged caused the Apostle Paul to be enraged.  He told the people to “look out for the dogs, look out for the evildoers, look out for those who mutilate the flesh” (v. 2).  How ironic that Paul, a Jew, called these Judaizers a name that those Jews often reserved for Gentiles.  How noteworthy that he called them “evildoers,” even though they were given the “oracles of God” in the Law (Romans 3:2).  How pathetic that they felt obligated to follow Abraham’s example of the covenant in circumcision, yet since they did not worship by faith but by the flesh they were merely mutilating themselves. 

 

Then he says, “For we are the real circumcision, who worship by the Spirit of God and glory in Christ Jesus and put no confidence in the flesh” (Philippians 3:3).   Paul continued by saying, “You think you have confidence in the flesh, I have more.”  The interesting thing about his resume in verses 5 and 6, most folks would just kill to have just a few of these things — and Paul had it all and they wished they had it.  In fact, take the word WISH and you’ll see what I mean:

 

  • Wielded authority.  Paul’s zeal led him to be a “persecutor of the church,” as someone who was given the authority to bring those belonging to the church of Jesus Christ into prison (Acts 22:5). 
  • Intellect:  to be a Pharisee meant you had to have a brilliant intellect.  You had to memorize the Pentateuch, know all 613 laws and traditions in place. 
  • Status:  The word “Pharisee” comes from the word to mean “separate.”  John MacArthur notes that to reach the level of a Pharisee was to reach the highest level in devout, legalistic Judaism.  They were separate unto the Law —
  • Heritage:  the first three items listed in Paul’s resume had nothing to do with anything he did, but everything to do with what his parents did.  Even before Paul could control his own devotion to the Law, his parents laid the foundation. 

 

Paul says, “I had confidence in the flesh — and even had more of a reason to confide in my flesh than any of you Judaizers.  But now, they are refuse to me!  My treasure that I had in my flesh, it’s trash now.”  Why?  Because that trash inteferes with the treasure of Jesus!

 

Romans 2:28-29, Paul says, “For no one is a Jew who is merely one outwardly, nor is circumcision outward and physical.  But a Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter. His praise is not from man but from God.”  These Judaizers were currently putting their faith in exactly what Paul did in the past — in their flesh – in merely outside rituals and services. 

 

Paul certainly hungered after a righteousness — a righteousness of his own that comes from the Law.  For him, the Law was a ladder by which he climbed to God.  Paul is not saying that the Law is a bad thing… on the contrary, the Law is good because it is God’s law.  Yet, Romans 3:20 says, “For by works of the law no human being will be justified in his sight, since through the law comes knowledge of sin.”   But in Romans 3:21, it says, “But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it.”  

 

So here again, Paul shows a righteousness that comes from God apart from the Law.  It comes not from the flesh obeying it, but through faith in the One who kept it on our behalf and who bestows that righteousness to us!  The flesh says, “I can get to God by depending on my works!”  The Spirit of God through Christ says, “I can get to God only through confident faith and total dependence on Jesus who stood as my substituted on that cross for my sin.  2 Cor. 5:21 says that “For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.”  

 

You say, I’m not like Paul — I don’t think it’s up to me!  Good!  Yet you must be careful.  We can fall into two categories as Christians.  One category says, “I’m in Christ.  He loves me as I am.  I don’t have to do anything for Him because I’m in the kingdom.”  Sadly, many are like that.  Please examine yourselves

 

Others believe that Jesus will only love them if they go on a missions trip, come to church every Sunday, read their Bible, etc.  They are trying to please God by what they do — not through a relationship.  That righteousness comes through a relationship and through fellowship with the one who lived and died and rose again on our behalf.

 

3.                  To know Christ means that we enjoy fellowship with Christ..

 

“ … that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death,  [11] that by any means possible I may attain the resurrection from the dead.”

 

Last Sunday, our church had a wonderful fellowship down at the park.  What a wonderful time that was when about 60 of us broke bread together, listened to the youth lead out in some wonderful worship music — we enjoyed a great time of fellowship.  What makes our fellowship work here at Boone’s Creek?  We enjoy being in each other’s company. 

 

Paul here notes that he wants to know Christ (I hope we’ve gotten that by now!).  Here, he says, “I want to know him.”  Paul wants to so identify with Christ that He wants to experience what Christ experiences — in full! 

 

Paul wanted to fellowship with Him not only in His life but also in Christ’s death — he wanted to be identified with Him in His sufferings.  Through going through the sufferings for Christ’s sake, He could identify with Him fully. In Acts 5:41, as the disciples were questioned and flogged by the Sanhedrin for preaching in the name of Jesus, we see this:  “Then they left the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer dishonor for the name.”   

 

Part of Paul’s initial calling was to suffer for Christ.  In Acts 9:15-16, we read: “But the Lord said to him, ‘Go, for he is a chosen instrument of mine to carry my name before the Gentiles and kings and the children of Israel.  [16] For I will show him how much he must suffer for the sake of my name.’” 

 

1 Peter 4:13 says, “But rejoice insofar as you share Christ's sufferings, that you may also rejoice and be glad when his glory is revealed.”  Matthew 5:11-12, Jesus says, “Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account.  [12] Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.”  The joyful life, the blessed life in Christ, the calling of Christ to His mission and work only comes through suffering for Christ’s sake. 

 

But He desired to be with Christ in His sufferings so that He would rely only on the sufficiency of God’s grace.  Job said in Job 13:15, “Though he slay me, I will hope in him.”  In 2 Corinthians 12:9-10, Paul says, "My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness." Therefore I will boast all the more gladly of my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may rest upon me.  [10] For the sake of Christ, then, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities. For when I am weak, then I am strong.”

 

He talks about the power of his resurrection.  You see, Paul invested all of his life in following the Law — in trying to do His own to fulfill God’s commands.  The power of the Law which he thought lead to life, leads to death because the Law brings along sin, whose wages are death (Romans 3:20, 6:23).  Therefore, if the Law leads to death, that cuts off fellowship with the living and holy God who is life!

 

Here’s the issue:  this was all accomplished at the cross.  All you have to do is look at the cross.  The cross goes in two directions:  vertically and horizontally.  Paul here is focusing on the vertical nature of his Christian walk:  knowing intimately and personally God through Christ.  But with that, he desires to not only know God but to make him known in fellowshipping with others. 1 John 1:1-4 says this:

 

That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we looked upon and have touched with our hands, concerning the word of life— [2] the life was made manifest, and we have seen it, and testify to it and proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and was made manifest to us— [3] that which we have seen and heard we proclaim also to you, so that you too may have fellowship with us; and indeed our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ.  [4] And we are writing these things so that our joy may be complete.

 

John desired to proclaim all that Christ is and was and will be — why? — so that all who hear may have fellowship with them, and thus have fellowship with God through Christ.  J.I. Packer notes, “The person who is not in fellowship with the Father and the Son is no Christian at all, and so cannot share with Christians the realities of their fellowship.” 

    

Conclusion

In the Antarctic summer of 1908-9, Sir Ernest Shackleton and three companions attempted to travel to the South Pole from their winter quarters. They set off with four ponies to help carry the load. Weeks later, their ponies dead, rations all but exhausted, they turned back toward their base, their goal not accomplished.

Altogether, they trekked 127 days. On the return journey, as Shackleton records in The Heart of the Antarctic, the time was spent talking about food — elaborate feasts, gourmet delights, sumptuous menus. As they staggered along, suffering from dysentery, not knowing whether they would survive, every waking hour was occupied with thoughts of eating. Jesus, who also knew the ravages of food deprivation, said,  "Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for RIGHTEOUSNESS." We can understand Shackleton's obsession with food, which offers a glimpse of the passion Jesus intends for our quest for righteousness. 

Do you have that passion for God's presence?  Do you have that hunger and thirst after God's righteousness?  May God grant us that passion even now. 

     
 

The Primary Task for Pastors

In For Preachers/Pastors on June 5, 2006 at 11:48 am

Dave Scarborough has written an excellent post as a reminder to preachers about their primary task. 

BC/AD or BCE/CE?

In Culture, Politics on June 3, 2006 at 8:57 pm

Al Mohler has a great blog entry about this controversy hitting Kentucky.  The hinge year from the BC/BCE to the AD/CE is still Christ's birth!  Why ignore it and not simply explore it to see why Jesus' birth is the hinge year?  Gimme a break!  I thought education was about informing.  What was I thinking?

The Slippery Slope of Stem Cells (Brent Thomas)

In Culture, Politics on June 3, 2006 at 6:08 pm

One Wednesday night at my church, we engaged in a discussion about stem cell research.  It was just weeks before the heated election of 2004 where both major party lines were quite opposite one another.  I am adamantly pro-life because I truly believe Scripture is in the area of the unborn child.  Brent Thomas has written a very compelling article on this issue.  May we not simply walk party line but truly understand the issues before us.  This is not a political issue — this is a life and Bible issue.

Five Year Olds and a Blessed Doctrine

In Theology on June 3, 2006 at 1:02 pm

Russell Moore, the Dean of Theology and Senior Vice President for Academic Administration at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, writes an incredibly moving piece about his five year old's birthday.  If this doesn't make you praise God for the blessed doctrine of adoption, I'll certainly pray for you.

Nothing “Gay” About It (from the Patriot Post)

In Culture, Politics, Religious Liberties on June 2, 2006 at 6:35 pm

From The Patriot Post (http://www.patriotpost.us)

It's that time of year again, when many unsuspecting American families travel to one of the nation's favorite family-theme parks only to find themselves at the epicenter of cultural degradation. This week, hordes of extroverted homosexuals congregated in Orlando at Disney's Pleasure Island for the annual exercise in societal entropy they call "Gay Days at Disney." Fortunately, the gaudy and lurid displays of sexual deviance at Disney are not typical of the public etiquette maintained by most homosexuals.

Our forefathers understood "gay" to mean "licentious, lacking moral restraints, leading a debauched or dissolute life." The "Gay '90s," for example, was a decade the sagacious Mark Twain dubbed "The Gilded Age" —an era of unmitigated opulence and unrestrained immorality exercised by a subculture of the elite. Now, in the current vernacular of the fashionably PC, "gay" alludes to "homosexual" and therefore evokes the words of that inimitable American philosopher Yogi Berra: "This is like deja vu all over again."

They may call it "gay," but it's not. Indeed, today's "gay" culture is equally dissolute, and its agenda is anathema to the bedrock institution of our past, present and future—the American family.

Homosexuality is not the most insidious of social trends that undermine the continuity of the traditional family.

Of course, homosexuality is not the most insidious of social trends that undermine the continuity of the traditional family—the essential governing unit and innate building block of natural society. That unfortunate distinction is reserved for those who divorce—particularly men who abandon their responsibility as husbands and fathers.

Concerns about divorce and its consequential degradation of social and moral order are not new. As Founding Father John Adams wrote, "The foundation of national morality must be laid in private families… How is it possible that Children can have any just Sense of the sacred Obligations of Morality or Religion if, from their earliest Infancy, they learn their Mothers live in habitual Infidelity to their fathers, and their fathers in as constant Infidelity to their Mothers?"

What is new is the vast number of fatherless children in America, kids who have been largely abandoned by their biological fathers, and the incalculable burden that places on them and society. One deleterious outcome associated with some of these broken and dysfunctional families, in addition to the life sentence they serve trying to sort out the rejection issues, is the absence of a healthy sexual identity—particularly in boys who have not been fathered properly. This identity void can result in lifetime pursuit of homosexual approval.

Though divorce, unlike homosexuality, lacks a well funded and well organized advocacy movement attempting to normalize it (divorce lawyers notwithstanding), it isn't difficult to connect the dots between dysfunctional families and homosexuality.

It isn't difficult to connect the dots between dysfunctional families and homosexuality.

To understand fully the homosexual subculture and its aggressive social agenda, then, one must gain some rational insight into the pathology of homosexual behavior. Unfortunately, there are few comprehensive treatises on the subject that inspire rational discourse—as opposed to emotive rants.

A few years ago, the most learned debates over the ordination of a homosexual cleric as Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of New Hampshire revealed that not only the Episcopal clergy and laity needed assistance understanding this issue, but the Christian Church as a whole needed clarity. Indeed our whole society needs a better, and in some cases more compassionate, understanding of homosexual pathology.

Consequently, The Patriot has just published The Homosexual Agenda and The Christian Response on line, a comprehensive yet concise review of gender-disorientation pathology. It's an essay that anyone, inside or outside the Church, making a psychological, theological or social argument concerning homosexuality, should read.

The real value of this landmark report's substance is not measured in the accolades from conservatives around the world who have reviewed it, but in the unguarded praise it has received from homosexuals (including some activists), who responded that, for the first time, they have been able to comprehend, with the help of this analysis, both the Christian theological and conservative social perspective and objections, without feeling personally attacked.

American families are under assault from many quarters.

Every American family is under assault from many quarters, one of the most menacing being the challenge to traditional sexual morality. The Homosexual Agenda and The Christian Response, provides context for understanding sexual deviancy and addresses the familial origins and pathology of such deviance, the political, cultural and social "normalization" agenda of homosexual practitioners, the conflict this agenda has created within the Christian Church, and an appropriate Christian response.

High on the homosexual political agenda list is same-sex marriage. President Bush announced this week his support for a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman. While we would support such an amendment, we believe that if the President is going to use what is left of his political capital to mobilize a national movement to amend our Constitution, there are much more important amendments to consider, starting with one mandating a balanced federal budget (just as most states require a balanced state budget).

That debate aside, if you're interested in healthy marriages and families, the consequences of broken families and the potential implications of a largely unabated homosexual agenda on the next generation of our children, take a few minutes to read The Homosexual Agenda and The Christian Response—regardless of your theological orientation.

Nothing “Gay” About It (from the Patriot Post)

In Culture, Politics, Religious Liberties on June 2, 2006 at 6:35 pm

From The Patriot Post (http://www.patriotpost.us)

It's that time of year again, when many unsuspecting American families travel to one of the nation's favorite family-theme parks only to find themselves at the epicenter of cultural degradation. This week, hordes of extroverted homosexuals congregated in Orlando at Disney's Pleasure Island for the annual exercise in societal entropy they call "Gay Days at Disney." Fortunately, the gaudy and lurid displays of sexual deviance at Disney are not typical of the public etiquette maintained by most homosexuals.

Our forefathers understood "gay" to mean "licentious, lacking moral restraints, leading a debauched or dissolute life." The "Gay '90s," for example, was a decade the sagacious Mark Twain dubbed "The Gilded Age" —an era of unmitigated opulence and unrestrained immorality exercised by a subculture of the elite. Now, in the current vernacular of the fashionably PC, "gay" alludes to "homosexual" and therefore evokes the words of that inimitable American philosopher Yogi Berra: "This is like deja vu all over again."

They may call it "gay," but it's not. Indeed, today's "gay" culture is equally dissolute, and its agenda is anathema to the bedrock institution of our past, present and future—the American family.

Homosexuality is not the most insidious of social trends that undermine the continuity of the traditional family.

Of course, homosexuality is not the most insidious of social trends that undermine the continuity of the traditional family—the essential governing unit and innate building block of natural society. That unfortunate distinction is reserved for those who divorce—particularly men who abandon their responsibility as husbands and fathers.

Concerns about divorce and its consequential degradation of social and moral order are not new. As Founding Father John Adams wrote, "The foundation of national morality must be laid in private families… How is it possible that Children can have any just Sense of the sacred Obligations of Morality or Religion if, from their earliest Infancy, they learn their Mothers live in habitual Infidelity to their fathers, and their fathers in as constant Infidelity to their Mothers?"

What is new is the vast number of fatherless children in America, kids who have been largely abandoned by their biological fathers, and the incalculable burden that places on them and society. One deleterious outcome associated with some of these broken and dysfunctional families, in addition to the life sentence they serve trying to sort out the rejection issues, is the absence of a healthy sexual identity—particularly in boys who have not been fathered properly. This identity void can result in lifetime pursuit of homosexual approval.

Though divorce, unlike homosexuality, lacks a well funded and well organized advocacy movement attempting to normalize it (divorce lawyers notwithstanding), it isn't difficult to connect the dots between dysfunctional families and homosexuality.

It isn't difficult to connect the dots between dysfunctional families and homosexuality.

To understand fully the homosexual subculture and its aggressive social agenda, then, one must gain some rational insight into the pathology of homosexual behavior. Unfortunately, there are few comprehensive treatises on the subject that inspire rational discourse—as opposed to emotive rants.

A few years ago, the most learned debates over the ordination of a homosexual cleric as Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of New Hampshire revealed that not only the Episcopal clergy and laity needed assistance understanding this issue, but the Christian Church as a whole needed clarity. Indeed our whole society needs a better, and in some cases more compassionate, understanding of homosexual pathology.

Consequently, The Patriot has just published The Homosexual Agenda and The Christian Response on line, a comprehensive yet concise review of gender-disorientation pathology. It's an essay that anyone, inside or outside the Church, making a psychological, theological or social argument concerning homosexuality, should read.

The real value of this landmark report's substance is not measured in the accolades from conservatives around the world who have reviewed it, but in the unguarded praise it has received from homosexuals (including some activists), who responded that, for the first time, they have been able to comprehend, with the help of this analysis, both the Christian theological and conservative social perspective and objections, without feeling personally attacked.

American families are under assault from many quarters.

Every American family is under assault from many quarters, one of the most menacing being the challenge to traditional sexual morality. The Homosexual Agenda and The Christian Response, provides context for understanding sexual deviancy and addresses the familial origins and pathology of such deviance, the political, cultural and social "normalization" agenda of homosexual practitioners, the conflict this agenda has created within the Christian Church, and an appropriate Christian response.

High on the homosexual political agenda list is same-sex marriage. President Bush announced this week his support for a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman. While we would support such an amendment, we believe that if the President is going to use what is left of his political capital to mobilize a national movement to amend our Constitution, there are much more important amendments to consider, starting with one mandating a balanced federal budget (just as most states require a balanced state budget).

That debate aside, if you're interested in healthy marriages and families, the consequences of broken families and the potential implications of a largely unabated homosexual agenda on the next generation of our children, take a few minutes to read The Homosexual Agenda and The Christian Response—regardless of your theological orientation.

The Days of the Two-Party System May Be Over?

In Culture, Politics on June 2, 2006 at 2:59 am

Peggy Noonan of the Opinion Journal (of the Wall Street Journal) and a former Reagan staffer believes that the days of the two-party political system may be drawing to a close. She writes a tremendous article. And as someone who does belong to a third party, I certainly felt a chime and slight justification in leaving my once-beloved Republican Party for a party that more represented the beliefs I could certainly support. Enjoy!

————————————————

Third Time
America may be ready for a new political party.

Thursday, June 1, 2006 12:01 a.m. EDT

Something's happening. I have a feeling we're at some new beginning, that a big breakup's coming, and that though it isn't and will not be immediately apparent, we'll someday look back on this era as the time when a shift began.

All my adult life, people have been saying that the two-party system is ending, that the Democrats' and Republicans' control of political power in America is winding down. According to the traditional critique, the two parties no longer offer the people the choice they want and deserve. Sometimes it's said they are too much alike–Tweedledum and Tweedledee. Sometimes it's said they're too polarizing–too red and too blue for a nation in which many see things through purple glasses.

In 1992 Ross Perot looked like the breakthrough, the man who would make third parties a reality. He destabilized the Republicans and then destabilized himself. By the end of his campaign he seemed to be the crazy old aunt in the attic.

The Perot experience seemed to put an end to third-party fever. But I think it's coming back, I think it's going to grow, and I think the force behind it is unique in our history.

This week there was a small boomlet of talk about a new internet entity called Unity '08–a small collection of party veterans including moderate Democrats (former Carter aide Hamilton Jordan) and liberal-leaning Republicans (former Ford hand Doug Bailey) trying to join together with college students and broaden the options in the 2008 election. In terms of composition, Unity seems like the Concord Coalition, the bipartisan group (Warren Rudman, Bob Kerrey) that warns against high spending and deficits.Unity seems to me to have America's growing desire for more political options right. But I think they've got the description of the problem wrong.

Their idea is that the two parties are too polarized to govern well. It is certainly true that the level of partisanship in Washington seems high. (Such things, admittedly, ebb, flow and are hard to judge. We look back at the post-World War II years and see a political climate of relative amity and moderation. But Alger Hiss and Dick Nixon didn't see it that way.) Nancy Pelosi seems to be pretty much in favor of anything that hurts Republicans, and Ken Mehlman is in favor of anything that works against Democrats. They both want their teams to win. Part of winning is making sure the other guy loses, and part of the fun of politics, of any contest, of life, can be the dance in the end zone.

But the dance has gotten dark.

Partisanship is fine when it's an expression of the high animal spirits produced by real political contention based on true political belief. But the current partisanship seems sour, not joyous. The partisanship has gotten deeper as less separates the governing parties in Washington. It is like what has been said of academic infighting: that it's so vicious because the stakes are so low.

The problem is not that the two parties are polarized. In many ways they're closer than ever. The problem is that the parties in Washington, and the people on the ground in America, are polarized. There is an increasing and profound distance between the rulers of both parties and the people–between the elites and the grunts, between those in power and those who put them there. On the ground in America, people worry terribly–really, there are people who actually worry about it every day–about endless, weird, gushing government spending. But in Washington, those in power–Republicans and Democrats–stand arm in arm as they spend and spend. (Part of the reason is that they think they can buy off your unhappiness one way or another. After all, it's worked in the past. A hunch: It's not going to work forever or much longer. They've really run that trick into the ground.)

On the ground in America, regular people worry about the changes wrought by the biggest wave of immigration in our history, much of it illegal and therefore wholly connected to the needs of the immigrant and wholly unconnected to the agreed-upon needs of our nation. Americans worry about the myriad implications of the collapse of the American border. But Washington doesn't. Democrat Ted Kennedy and Republican George W. Bush see things pretty much eye to eye. They are going to educate the American people out of their low concerns.

There is a widespread sense in America–a conviction, actually–that we are not safe in the age of terror. That the port, the local power plant, even the local school, are not protected. Is Washington worried about this? Not so you'd notice. They're only worried about seeming unconcerned.

More to the point, people see the Republicans as incapable of managing the monster they've helped create–this big Homeland Security/Intelligence apparatus that is like some huge buffed guy at the gym who looks strong but can't even put on his T-shirt without help because he's so muscle-bound. As for the Democrats, who co-created Homeland Security, no one–no one–thinks they would be more managerially competent. Nor does anyone expect the Democrats to be more visionary as to what needs to be done. The best they can hope is the Democrats competently serve their interest groups and let the benefits trickle down.

Right now the Republicans and Democrats in Washington seem, from the outside, to be an elite colluding against the voter. They're in agreement: immigration should not be controlled but increased, spending will increase, etc. Are there some dramatic differences? Yes. But both parties act as if they see them not as important questions (gay marriage, for instance) but as wedge issues. Which is, actually, abusive of people on both sides of the question. If it's a serious issue, face it. Don't play with it.

I don't see any potential party, or potential candidate, on the scene right now who can harness the disaffection of growing portions of the electorate. But a new group or entity that could define the problem correctly–that sees the big divide not as something between the parties but between America's ruling elite and its people–would be making long strides in putting third party ideas in play in America again.

Ms. Noonan is a contributing editor of The Wall Street Journal and author of "John Paul the Great: Remembering a Spiritual Father," (Penguin, 2005), which you can order from the OpinionJournal bookstore. Her column appears Thursdays.