Matthew R. Perry

Archive for January, 2007

More Pictures from Trinidad 2007

In Uncategorized on January 31, 2007 at 4:57 pm

dsc00036.JPG

Here I am preaching at the marriage conference I conducted called “Keeping Your Marriage in Tune: Singing the Song of Solomon.” Roddie Taylor, the pastor of the church we worked on, said, “Talk straight to our people.” And I did. But it resulted in some very intimate and personal questions asked back dealing with marriage and all its aspects. mapcamera-001.jpg

As we waited and waited and waited in Lexington for our flight to leave. Scheduled to leave at 11:00 a.m., it left and 12:50 p.m. and almost made us miss our flight to Port of Spain. Wow! Sometimes, the Great Commission isn’t always a smooth road.

More tomorrow.

A Life-Changing Series of Sermons for Me

In Uncategorized on January 30, 2007 at 11:14 pm

Last month, after ordering Arturo Azurdia’s book on Spirit-Empowered Preaching, I went to his website (http://www.spiritempoweredpreaching.com) and downloaded his four-part series from the IFCA Pacific Northwest Regional Conference in Port Angeles, Washington — and listened to them while in Trinidad.  While the book was quite good, the sermons changed me.

Azurdia is Associate Professor of Pastoral Theology/Director of Pastoral Mentoring at Western Seminary, Portland, Oregon. He was minister of a church for more than 10 years. He is married to Lori and they have 2 children

Trinidad 2007 Update (1.28.07)

In Uncategorized on January 28, 2007 at 1:46 pm

We had a successful marriage conference at First Baptist San Fernando this past Friday and Saturday.  Forty-three were in attendance and we had some good feedback and questions during the conference. 

But we praise God that this Sunday morning during a three-hour service where I preached on Mark 14:1-11 at Mt. Beulah Evangelical Baptist Church in Point Fortin, one man named Theophilus gave his life to Jesus Christ.  Glory to God and God alone!

We are going to the southwest portion of Trinidad this afternoon and various places tomorrow, so keep us in prayer.  We plan to be back in Lexington at 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday.  Pray all the flights go smoothly. 

We made it to Trinidad safely

In Uncategorized on January 24, 2007 at 10:14 am

After almost missing our connection due to the late flights out of Lexington, KY, we made the connection with seconds to spare and made it to Port of Spain, Trinidad, smoothly. The flight was just over four hours from Atlanta. Customs and immigration were no problem. We made it to Point Fortin around 11:45 p.m. and got to work right away the next day. Some of the tile at the church was already laid. Here are some pictures to give you an idea.

p1010112.JPG

Here is the title on the platform of the sanctuary at the church in Point Fortin.

p1010120.JPG

Here is am cleaning away the”mud” overflow which seals the tile to the floor so the other men could begin laying the next row of tile.

p1010132.JPG

This is Aaron and Panther. Aaron has no legs and he and Panther laid down the tile quickly and expertly. We hope to send you some more pictures so you can really see the difference. It’s an Extreme Church Makeover.

p1010128.JPG

This is Kasia, Roddie’s granddaughter. She has grown up so much. When we first went in ‘04, she was only eight months old and barely walking. Now, she is growing up, running, talking, and being queen of the castle like always. What a sweet child.

I have an interview today at the Christian radio station in Port of Spain at 4:00 p.m. today (3:00 p.m. EST) concerning the marriage conference I’m conducting this weekend, so please pray. Roddie Taylor, the pastor here, was to be in on the interview, but he is ill so I have to do the fifteen minutes solo. Please pray for me.

God is high above all the nations and is not tied to any culture. We praise God that even those we Americans are in Trinidad, God is with us as well.

We’ll keep you posted.

Invisible Bed Fence (Rhett and Link)

In Uncategorized on January 19, 2007 at 8:58 pm

I Need One of These for our Missions Trip

Blogging from Trinidad Next Week

In Uncategorized on January 17, 2007 at 3:33 pm

I and four other men from our church will be in Trinidad & Tobago this coming week, so I will be postponing the Expository Preaching series and will blog daily from the field.  Keep these matters in prayer:

  • Traveling mercy as we travel from Lexington to Atlanta to Port of Spain;
  • Construction work we shall do at the Mt. Beulah Evangelical Baptist Church in Point Fortin;
  • The Marriage Conference I will conduct on January 26-27 at the First Baptist Church of San Fernando;
  • That we would be a faithful witness on the airplanes, in the airports, at in Trinidad.

You’re an Expository Preacher? Ohh! — Addendum to Part II

In Preaching on January 15, 2007 at 4:26 pm

An old friend e-mailed me about the current series on expository preaching and he made a good point about dealing with the text that reinforced this particular part:  deal with the “problem texts” directly — don’t hover over them.  He’s right.

You see, “problem texts” are so because the problem lies within us, not the text.  Calvinists will breeze over 2 Peter 3:9 and maybe even John 3:16 because these texts do not on the surface conform to their theology (although, I believe, a case could be made — but I digress).  Arminians have a problem with Romans 9:14-18, so they breeze over this text by applying it only to Israel and not as part of God’s covenant plan throughout history.

Our Bible should affect our theology, not vice versa.  Our theology must arise out of the principles and doctrines outlined in Scripture.  Otherwise, why not just preach from Grudem’s Systematic Theology?  Only the Scriptures are inspired (breathed out) by God.

Just some thoughts.

You’re an Expository Preacher? Ohh! — Addendum to Part II

In Preaching on January 15, 2007 at 4:26 pm

An old friend e-mailed me about the current series on expository preaching and he made a good point about dealing with the text that reinforced this particular part:  deal with the “problem texts” directly — don’t hover over them.  He’s right.

You see, “problem texts” are so because the problem lies within us, not the text.  Calvinists will breeze over 2 Peter 3:9 and maybe even John 3:16 because these texts do not on the surface conform to their theology (although, I believe, a case could be made — but I digress).  Arminians have a problem with Romans 9:14-18, so they breeze over this text by applying it only to Israel and not as part of God’s covenant plan throughout history.

Our Bible should affect our theology, not vice versa.  Our theology must arise out of the principles and doctrines outlined in Scripture.  Otherwise, why not just preach from Grudem’s Systematic Theology?  Only the Scriptures are inspired (breathed out) by God.

Just some thoughts.

“Come Over to Trinidad and Help Us” (Acts 16:6-10)

In Missions, Sermons on January 15, 2007 at 2:32 pm

It’s called the Greatest Show on Earth — and, no, I am not talking about Barnum & Bailey’s circus. Some have said it is much like Mardi Gras on caffeine. The week before the season of Lent, which is a season of fasting until Resurrection Sunday (Easter), the country of Trinidad and Tobago engages in a celebration known as Carnival.

Look at what the Trinidad and Tobago tourism website says about Carnival:

With its massive masquerade bands, astounding costumes, pulsating music and unparalleled stamina for partying, Trinidad & Tobago’s Carnival is often described as the world’s greatest street festival. In 2007, the annual Carnival season climaxes on Monday, February 19th and Tuesday, February 20th, when thousands of costumed revellers take to the streets to “play mas”. For the fun loving people who live in these sun kissed isles, Carnival begins in earnest on Boxing Day when the fetes (parties) go non-stop until Carnival Sunday. It is during this period that calypso tents open their doors to the public and cultural shows, from limbo competitions to massive soca concerts, begin.
An explosion of colour, music, revelry, and creativity, Trinidad and Tobago’s Carnival has spawned similar celebrations around the world; but nothing on earth can rival the abandon, euphoria and stunning spectacle of our festival. Carnival in these islands has evolved over 200 years from a celebration enjoyed exclusively by French plantation owners, to an enormous event that equally embraces people of every colour, creed, class and background. Larger than life, the festival defies simple explanations.

One word that many in Trinidad use to describe this festival is the word ‘bacchanalian.’ Much lewdness and debauchery accompany this festival. It is for that reason that many churches do not participate because the activities there indulge the flesh so badly that their message would be lost. Some try — but are overrun by the party.

It is no coincidence that we are traveling to Trinidad in January. When I went to Trinidad last year to conduct a leadership conference, one of the sessions dealt with the leader’s family. I opened it up for questions, and we spent more time talking about marriage and family issues than we did with the actual lecture portion. Why? Because people want to know what God says about these issues. They are begging for someone to come over to Trinidad and help them.

We have a tradition at our church (and someone defined a tradition as anything in a church that is done more than once). That tradition is this: if we have a team going on mission — whether to Trinidad or New Orleans or WorldChangers or any other team that God sends from our church — we as a church will commission then with our prayers and our support to advance the Kingdom of our Lord Jesus. We must not misunderstand the purpose of these services. We are not here to simply exalt the five who are going. We are following a biblical pattern where churches under the guidance of the Holy Spirit send with God’s blessing. Why do they go? Because the Holy Spirit reveals to men and women of God the need to help that land know the Good News of Jesus Christ.

1. We cannot initiate a spiritual work — only God can (Acts 16:6-7).

Paul had plans. Yet Paul’s plans never overrode the plan of the Holy Spirit of God. During Paul’s first missionary journey with Barnabus. They traveled various places in Asia Minor. Yet, Paul’s plans were firmly grounded in God’s plans. Paul’s conversion and calling to the Gentiles came from the Holy Spirit revealed from heaven. And we see that when this calling came about that on his first missionary journey during a church service. In Acts 13:2, “While they were worshiping and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, ‘Set apart for me Barnabus and Saul for the work to which I have called them.” The Holy Spirit of God is the one who commissions. So they went to Cyprus, Antioch Pisidia, Iconium, Lystra, Antioch in Syria, then back to Jerusalem.

Prior to the second missionary journey, something which seemed rather unspiritual happened.

And after some days Paul said to Barnabas, “Let us return and visit the brothers in every city where we proclaimed the word of the Lord, and see how they are.” [37] Now Barnabas wanted to take with them John called Mark. [38] But Paul thought best not to take with them one who had withdrawn from them in Pamphylia and had not gone with them to the work. [39] And there arose a sharp disagreement, so that they separated from each other. Barnabas took Mark with him and sailed away to Cyprus, [40] but Paul chose Silas and departed, having been commended by the brothers to the grace of the Lord. [41] And he went through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches (Acts 15:36-41, ESV).

This disagreement over the value (or lack) of Mark caused Paul and Barnabus to split. While on the surface, this is tragic, but God actually used this to multiply his ministry but sending two teams in two directions.

Yet, just as the Spirit opens doors (to God be the glory), so too does the Spirit close those doors (to God be the glory). We cannot manipulate the work of God. It’s just as much of a sin to try to go where God has said no than to not go when God says go. Paul understood this principle. He knew from his studies in the Old Testament that when Israel went into battle without the presence of the Lord, defeat occurred because his favor did not go before them.

(More tomorrow.)

“Come Over to Trinidad and Help Us” (Acts 16:6-10)

In Missions, Sermons on January 15, 2007 at 2:32 pm

It’s called the Greatest Show on Earth — and, no, I am not talking about Barnum & Bailey’s circus. Some have said it is much like Mardi Gras on caffeine. The week before the season of Lent, which is a season of fasting until Resurrection Sunday (Easter), the country of Trinidad and Tobago engages in a celebration known as Carnival.

Look at what the Trinidad and Tobago tourism website says about Carnival:

With its massive masquerade bands, astounding costumes, pulsating music and unparalleled stamina for partying, Trinidad & Tobago’s Carnival is often described as the world’s greatest street festival. In 2007, the annual Carnival season climaxes on Monday, February 19th and Tuesday, February 20th, when thousands of costumed revellers take to the streets to “play mas”. For the fun loving people who live in these sun kissed isles, Carnival begins in earnest on Boxing Day when the fetes (parties) go non-stop until Carnival Sunday. It is during this period that calypso tents open their doors to the public and cultural shows, from limbo competitions to massive soca concerts, begin.
An explosion of colour, music, revelry, and creativity, Trinidad and Tobago’s Carnival has spawned similar celebrations around the world; but nothing on earth can rival the abandon, euphoria and stunning spectacle of our festival. Carnival in these islands has evolved over 200 years from a celebration enjoyed exclusively by French plantation owners, to an enormous event that equally embraces people of every colour, creed, class and background. Larger than life, the festival defies simple explanations.

One word that many in Trinidad use to describe this festival is the word ‘bacchanalian.’ Much lewdness and debauchery accompany this festival. It is for that reason that many churches do not participate because the activities there indulge the flesh so badly that their message would be lost. Some try — but are overrun by the party.

It is no coincidence that we are traveling to Trinidad in January. When I went to Trinidad last year to conduct a leadership conference, one of the sessions dealt with the leader’s family. I opened it up for questions, and we spent more time talking about marriage and family issues than we did with the actual lecture portion. Why? Because people want to know what God says about these issues. They are begging for someone to come over to Trinidad and help them.

We have a tradition at our church (and someone defined a tradition as anything in a church that is done more than once). That tradition is this: if we have a team going on mission — whether to Trinidad or New Orleans or WorldChangers or any other team that God sends from our church — we as a church will commission then with our prayers and our support to advance the Kingdom of our Lord Jesus. We must not misunderstand the purpose of these services. We are not here to simply exalt the five who are going. We are following a biblical pattern where churches under the guidance of the Holy Spirit send with God’s blessing. Why do they go? Because the Holy Spirit reveals to men and women of God the need to help that land know the Good News of Jesus Christ.

1. We cannot initiate a spiritual work — only God can (Acts 16:6-7).

Paul had plans. Yet Paul’s plans never overrode the plan of the Holy Spirit of God. During Paul’s first missionary journey with Barnabus. They traveled various places in Asia Minor. Yet, Paul’s plans were firmly grounded in God’s plans. Paul’s conversion and calling to the Gentiles came from the Holy Spirit revealed from heaven. And we see that when this calling came about that on his first missionary journey during a church service. In Acts 13:2, “While they were worshiping and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, ‘Set apart for me Barnabus and Saul for the work to which I have called them.” The Holy Spirit of God is the one who commissions. So they went to Cyprus, Antioch Pisidia, Iconium, Lystra, Antioch in Syria, then back to Jerusalem.

Prior to the second missionary journey, something which seemed rather unspiritual happened.

And after some days Paul said to Barnabas, “Let us return and visit the brothers in every city where we proclaimed the word of the Lord, and see how they are.” [37] Now Barnabas wanted to take with them John called Mark. [38] But Paul thought best not to take with them one who had withdrawn from them in Pamphylia and had not gone with them to the work. [39] And there arose a sharp disagreement, so that they separated from each other. Barnabas took Mark with him and sailed away to Cyprus, [40] but Paul chose Silas and departed, having been commended by the brothers to the grace of the Lord. [41] And he went through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches (Acts 15:36-41, ESV).

This disagreement over the value (or lack) of Mark caused Paul and Barnabus to split. While on the surface, this is tragic, but God actually used this to multiply his ministry but sending two teams in two directions.

Yet, just as the Spirit opens doors (to God be the glory), so too does the Spirit close those doors (to God be the glory). We cannot manipulate the work of God. It’s just as much of a sin to try to go where God has said no than to not go when God says go. Paul understood this principle. He knew from his studies in the Old Testament that when Israel went into battle without the presence of the Lord, defeat occurred because his favor did not go before them.

(More tomorrow.)

You’re An Expository Preacher? Ohh, Part 2: You Deal With Topics You’d Otherwise Avoid

In For Preachers/Pastors, Preaching on January 14, 2007 at 12:02 am

Every preacher has a favorite subject on which he loves to preach. I remember hearing an example of this when someone preached on the Fall of Man. He told his congregation, “I’d like to talk about the rebellion against God, the reaction of God — and a few words about baptism.” Some preachers love to preach on evangelism, the end times, Calvinism, and many other popular topics almost to the exclusion of every other topic.

Pastors are under great temptation to keep their situation smooth. To use the vernacular, pastors simply do not want to “rock the boat” unnecessarily. The thoughts of introducing a subject of controversy on Sunday morning where most members and visitors attend would be out of the question.

Yet, expository preaching guards us from being a Johnny One-Note.  Allow me to give a personal example.

The day was August 20, 2006 — a special day in our household, for I had the blessing of baptizing Hannah as she publicly responded to Jesus Christ as her Lord.  I was in the midst of preaching through Romans 8.  That morning, not only did we have a number of family and friends visiting, but we also had a large number of general visitors as well.

In the midst of this series, I found that August 20 would have me preach on Romans 8:26-30.

Likewise the Spirit helps us in our weakness. For we do not know what to pray for as we ought, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words. And he who searches hearts knows what is the mind of the Spirit, because the Spirit intercedes for the saints according to the will of God. And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.

As you may have noticed, a number of lightning rods are in this verse: foreknew, predestined, among others. I noticed though that by preaching expositionally, the people expected me to preach from that text. If I did not, they would have immediately seen this and realized that I did not want to tackle this subject. It ultimately would have undermined my credibility in preaching, saying in effect that I would not preach the whole counsel of God.

So, in essence, this model of preaching not only forces the listeners to address certain issues, but it also forces the minister to address some issues as well. When preaching through 1 Corinthians, preachers have to deal with church discipline when you approach chapter five. When preaching through Romans, you have to deal with the implications of election and predestination in Romans 9. When preaching through Joshua, you have to deal with the rationale behind God sending Israel to wipe out an entire tribe or nation. (The reason being is that God exacted justice immediately during that era.) Otherwise, you would avoid these sticky issues. By tackling them with prayer and the power of the Holy Spirit, you give your people food by which they may be nourished and show them that the Bible speaks to every issue and is entirely relevant.

So preach expositionally! Preach the Word!

You’re An Expository Preacher? Ohh, Part 2: You Deal With Topics You’d Otherwise Avoid

In For Preachers/Pastors, Preaching on January 14, 2007 at 12:02 am

Every preacher has a favorite subject on which he loves to preach. I remember hearing an example of this when someone preached on the Fall of Man. He told his congregation, “I’d like to talk about the rebellion against God, the reaction of God — and a few words about baptism.” Some preachers love to preach on evangelism, the end times, Calvinism, and many other popular topics almost to the exclusion of every other topic.

Pastors are under great temptation to keep their situation smooth. To use the vernacular, pastors simply do not want to “rock the boat” unnecessarily. The thoughts of introducing a subject of controversy on Sunday morning where most members and visitors attend would be out of the question.

Yet, expository preaching guards us from being a Johnny One-Note.  Allow me to give a personal example.

The day was August 20, 2006 — a special day in our household, for I had the blessing of baptizing Hannah as she publicly responded to Jesus Christ as her Lord.  I was in the midst of preaching through Romans 8.  That morning, not only did we have a number of family and friends visiting, but we also had a large number of general visitors as well.

In the midst of this series, I found that August 20 would have me preach on Romans 8:26-30.

Likewise the Spirit helps us in our weakness. For we do not know what to pray for as we ought, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words. And he who searches hearts knows what is the mind of the Spirit, because the Spirit intercedes for the saints according to the will of God. And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.

As you may have noticed, a number of lightning rods are in this verse: foreknew, predestined, among others. I noticed though that by preaching expositionally, the people expected me to preach from that text. If I did not, they would have immediately seen this and realized that I did not want to tackle this subject. It ultimately would have undermined my credibility in preaching, saying in effect that I would not preach the whole counsel of God.

So, in essence, this model of preaching not only forces the listeners to address certain issues, but it also forces the minister to address some issues as well. When preaching through 1 Corinthians, preachers have to deal with church discipline when you approach chapter five. When preaching through Romans, you have to deal with the implications of election and predestination in Romans 9. When preaching through Joshua, you have to deal with the rationale behind God sending Israel to wipe out an entire tribe or nation. (The reason being is that God exacted justice immediately during that era.) Otherwise, you would avoid these sticky issues. By tackling them with prayer and the power of the Holy Spirit, you give your people food by which they may be nourished and show them that the Bible speaks to every issue and is entirely relevant.

So preach expositionally! Preach the Word!

Walter Kaiser’s Toward an Exegetical Theology (Book Review)

In Book Review on January 13, 2007 at 4:17 pm

080102197901lzzzzzzz.jpgKaiser, Walter C., Jr. Toward an Exegetical Theology: Biblical Exegesis for Preaching & Teaching (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1981). 261 pp. $25.99

Introduction

Walter C. Kaiser Jr. serves as president and Colman M. Mockler Distinguished Professor of Told Testament at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary in South Hamilton, Massachusetts. He is the author of numerous books and publications, as well as one who serves on the board of many Christian organizations. Kaiser’s purpose for this book is to bridge the gap between the hermeneutics and homiletics departments of our Bible colleges and seminaries.

It is hoped, then, that this volume will be useful to those who are already in the pastorate and who are struggling week after week to resolve just this problem. But the main object of our work must be the scores of those men and women who are currently enrolled in Biblical and theological studies at the collegiate or seminary level (22).

Kaiser desires this work to be a “type of firstfruits to the Church at large … [to] either rectify the situation with a good theory of exegesis” (22) in bridging the gap between hermeneutics and homiletics, “or to drop all professional pretensions from our Biblical and theological departments and offer only research-oriented degrees leading to teaching and writing posts in academia” (23).

Summary

Kaiser divides Toward an Exegetical Theology into four parts. Part I presents Kaiser’s introduction to this work. This chapter deals with the decline in the area of hermeneutics to discover the authorial intent of the text from the Puritan age until the present. Kaiser notes the “crisis of the pulpit” (36). Far too many pastors ignore the Old Testament, deem the Old Testament irrelevant, or only relate it through the eyes of the New Testament. Chapter Two deals with the definition and history of exegesis. Kaiser states, “The sole object of the expositor is to explain as clearly as possible what the writer meant when he wrote the text under examination” (45). This statement for Kaiser defines exegesis, and then methodically takes the reader through the various eras and stages of exegesis through church history.

Part II, entitled “The Syntactical-Theological Method,” contains six chapters dealing with various types of analyses which connect syntactical issues with biblical theology. Chapter Three addresses contextual analysis. “Good exegetical procedure dictates that the details be viewed in light of the total context” (69). Chapter Four deals with syntactical analysis and the various literary structures in Scripture such as prose, poetry, narrative, wisdom, and apocalyptic literature. “Each of these literary forms has a distinctive shape and style; accordingly, the approach to each form must be modified to meet its particular needs” (91). Within these forms, he notes that “the unit of concern must be the paragraph” (95) for paragraphs help the reader understand the flow and the theme of the ideas presented. Chapter Five addresses verbal analyses. Kaiser states, “Words and idioms are the most basic of all the linguistic building-blocks of meaning” (105). He notes the importance of noting the surrounding words in understanding that word’s meaning. Chapter Six addresses theological analyses, which Kaiser calls “the missing ingredient in most sermon preparation” (131). He notes “exegesis is never an end in itself [but] must come to terms with the audience as well as with what the author meant by the words he used” (149). Chapter Seven then deals with this stage of preparation in dealing with homiletical analysis — an area which in Kaiser believes theological education has failed. In this chapter, he presents to the reader “’Preparations for Homiletical Usage’ [where] the basic thrust of the chapter will be … principlization,’ the final task in the exegetical process” (150).

Part III outlines special issues in expository preaching such as the use of prophecy, narrative, and poetry respectively in chapters nine, ten, and eleven. Kaiser notes in chapter nine that while preacher should preach prophetically, he must take care not to preach solely against institutional and cultural structures. Old Testament prophets made their primary appeal “to the individuals who made up those communities and institutions” (187). In chapter ten, Kaiser notes, “What is needed in preaching on … narrative portions is some method of pointing out the abiding meanings and continuing significance for all believers” (197). Chapter eleven outlines how to preach Old Testament poetry expositionally, directing the preacher to know how “parallelism … is the dominant stylistic feature” (212).

The conclusion of this work is found in Part IV. Chapter 12, entitled “The Exegete/Pastor and the Power of God,” serves as the last chapter of this work and possesses a pastoral tone to the expositor in seeking the Holy Spirit for his power in the pulpit. “In all good conscience point to the presence of the Holy Spirit as the source of any confidence that we might have in our message even after we have acted most responsibly in the study and preparation of the text for proclamation” (235).

Critical Evaluation

As stated earlier, Kaiser’s aim in this work is to help bridge the gap between the hermeneutics and homiletics departments of our Bible colleges and seminaries in the area of biblical exegesis – and he succeeds! In the preface, Kaiser believes that in order for one to be a proper exegete of the Scriptures, he could not “hope to begin unless and until he is able to translate the text from Greek to Hebrew” (9). He grants though that many pastors, teachers, and missionaries are not able to partake of these educational opportunities. Given these issues, Kaiser notes that “the method expounded in this book can be profitably employed even if one has access only to a translated version of the Scriptures” (10). Kaiser finds a tremendous balance in providing solid help for those in all levels of biblical scholarship.

Kaiser’s work rightly advocates allowing the Scriptures to develop the framework for the preacher’s and the listener’s theology. First, he addresses in Chapter 1 the current crises in exegetical theology and notes the “yawning chasm between understanding the content of Scripture as it was given in the past and proclaiming it with such relevance in the present” (18). Kaiser notes, “We contend that the theology must be objectively derived from the text; not subjectively imposed on the text by the interpreter” (137). These impositions on the text also happen with narrative passages. He understands the temptations many preachers face and addresses them directly. “The exegete must resist the temptation to impose a mold over the text by forcing that text to answer one of his favorite questions or to deal with one of the contemporary issues that our cultures wants to have solved” (153).

His solution to this temptation involves determining the theme of each paragraph, looking for repeated terms which are stressed or defined, and looking to see what how these paragraphs fit into the overall book or section in which they are found. This theme runs continually through this work, reinforcing this all-to-important principle that the Christian’s theology must arise from the text. He rightly believes that a procedure must be in place to help understand the core meaning of the text will the preacher derive his theological framework. The interpreter accomplishes this analysis through studying the terms, events, quotes and covenants found in the text, engaging in a “full involvement of Biblical theology as part of our exegesis” (137).

His chapter on “The Definition and History of Exegesis” contains some excellent material which lays the groundwork for not only the rest of the work but for a career’s worth of work on the part of the exegete. He includes a wonderful paragraph that the preacher and exegete would do well to display in a prominent place for easy reference:

To begin with, let it be stated as a sort of first principle that preparation for preaching is always a movement which must begin with the text of Scripture and have as its goal the proclamation of that Word in such a way that it can be heard with all its poignancy and relevancy to the modern situation without dismissing one iota of its original normativeness (48).

He provides a helpful history of exegesis. Though this overview is not as comprehensive as Sidney Greidanus’ overview in Preaching Christ from the Old Testament (Eerdmans, 1999), its inclusion in this chapter immediately the section on the definition of exegesis bolsters Kaiser’s argument concerning the nature of good exegesis. For instance, Kaiser defines exegesis as seeking to “identify the single truth-intention of individual phrases, clauses, and sentences as they make up the thought of paragraphs, sections, and ultimately, entire books” (47). As he examines the five stages of Christian history, Kaiser wonderfully extracts the positives and negatives that arise from each stage of history and shows the lesson that deviating from authorial intent takes the interpreter down a problematic path — all the while showing the worthwhile intent behind such a method. He presents both sides, yet does not give too much ground to the incorrect view. The preacher and exegete will benefit from such a balanced presentation.

Another strength with Kaiser’s work is his use of humor and metaphors periodically in his explanations. This book contains technical information about the study of exegesis, so by Kaiser using humor and word pictures, he allows the reader slightly unwind as he absorbs the content. For instance, in chapter five in his discussion on verbal analysis, he discusses the importance of the surrounding words in determining the specific meaning of a word. With levity, he notes, that “words, like people, are known by the company they keep” (106). Another example is found in Chapter 6 when he uses a stirring metaphor in describing the trained clergy’s failure to connect biblical texts to today’s situations and their “Achilles’ heel” (131). The inclusion of these word pictures among the norm of dry, academic language that so pervades these types of works.

With the strengths found in this volume come the weaknesses. The most glaring weakness is the placement of the contents of chapter twelve. The topic of this chapter addresses the exegete/pastor and the power of God. In a quote above, Kaiser noted that for the pastor, the Holy Spirit is the source of confidence in our message regardless of the number of steps taken in preparation. Considering the importance of the presence of the Holy Spirit, Kaiser should have placed this chapter toward the beginning of this book rather than at the very last chapter. Jesus did not say, “Proper sermon preparation and exegetical work will teach you all things.” Rather, Jesus says in John 14:26, “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you” (John 14:26, ESV). Kaiser fully agrees with this verse. Given this sentiment, the placement of such an important understanding at the very end of this work is puzzling.

While Kaiser notes the importance of biblical truths guiding one’s theology, he strays from this philosophy not once but twice in reference to the same passage: 1 Corinthians 14:34-35. In making the point that the exegete should pay “close attention to each subtle nuance that may aid us in detecting sectional divisions” (77), he proceeds to engage in extra-biblical speculation. He wonders aloud, “Could it not be that the debated passage of 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 is a quote from Rabbinic law?” with no rationale on how he arrived at this point. He then proceeds to connect this passage with other passages from 1 Timothy 2:8-11 as well as 1 Corinthians 11:4-5. He also addresses these same verses on pp. 119-120, apparently to show how to apply the principles of verbal analysis. Kaiser violates his own principles for confuses Paul’s admonition in 1 Corinthians 11:4-5 with men and women who pray during their own private worship with principles Paul lays out for public worship in 1 Corinthians 14:26-35.

Conclusion

I would highly recommend Kaiser’s work as a good starting point in understanding how to construct a sermon that bridges the ancient text of Scripture to contemporary times. He correctly diagnoses the issues facing the contemporary preacher and then proceeds to help the preacher in a methodical fashion overcome the obstacles facing him in dealing with Old and New Testament exegetical problems. The pastor and seminarian will benefit greatly from the groundbreaking contribution.

Walter Kaiser’s Toward an Exegetical Theology (Book Review)

In Book Review on January 13, 2007 at 4:17 pm

080102197901lzzzzzzz.jpgKaiser, Walter C., Jr. Toward an Exegetical Theology: Biblical Exegesis for Preaching & Teaching (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1981). 261 pp. $25.99

Introduction

Walter C. Kaiser Jr. serves as president and Colman M. Mockler Distinguished Professor of Told Testament at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary in South Hamilton, Massachusetts. He is the author of numerous books and publications, as well as one who serves on the board of many Christian organizations. Kaiser’s purpose for this book is to bridge the gap between the hermeneutics and homiletics departments of our Bible colleges and seminaries.

It is hoped, then, that this volume will be useful to those who are already in the pastorate and who are struggling week after week to resolve just this problem. But the main object of our work must be the scores of those men and women who are currently enrolled in Biblical and theological studies at the collegiate or seminary level (22).

Kaiser desires this work to be a “type of firstfruits to the Church at large … [to] either rectify the situation with a good theory of exegesis” (22) in bridging the gap between hermeneutics and homiletics, “or to drop all professional pretensions from our Biblical and theological departments and offer only research-oriented degrees leading to teaching and writing posts in academia” (23).

Summary

Kaiser divides Toward an Exegetical Theology into four parts. Part I presents Kaiser’s introduction to this work. This chapter deals with the decline in the area of hermeneutics to discover the authorial intent of the text from the Puritan age until the present. Kaiser notes the “crisis of the pulpit” (36). Far too many pastors ignore the Old Testament, deem the Old Testament irrelevant, or only relate it through the eyes of the New Testament. Chapter Two deals with the definition and history of exegesis. Kaiser states, “The sole object of the expositor is to explain as clearly as possible what the writer meant when he wrote the text under examination” (45). This statement for Kaiser defines exegesis, and then methodically takes the reader through the various eras and stages of exegesis through church history.

Part II, entitled “The Syntactical-Theological Method,” contains six chapters dealing with various types of analyses which connect syntactical issues with biblical theology. Chapter Three addresses contextual analysis. “Good exegetical procedure dictates that the details be viewed in light of the total context” (69). Chapter Four deals with syntactical analysis and the various literary structures in Scripture such as prose, poetry, narrative, wisdom, and apocalyptic literature. “Each of these literary forms has a distinctive shape and style; accordingly, the approach to each form must be modified to meet its particular needs” (91). Within these forms, he notes that “the unit of concern must be the paragraph” (95) for paragraphs help the reader understand the flow and the theme of the ideas presented. Chapter Five addresses verbal analyses. Kaiser states, “Words and idioms are the most basic of all the linguistic building-blocks of meaning” (105). He notes the importance of noting the surrounding words in understanding that word’s meaning. Chapter Six addresses theological analyses, which Kaiser calls “the missing ingredient in most sermon preparation” (131). He notes “exegesis is never an end in itself [but] must come to terms with the audience as well as with what the author meant by the words he used” (149). Chapter Seven then deals with this stage of preparation in dealing with homiletical analysis — an area which in Kaiser believes theological education has failed. In this chapter, he presents to the reader “’Preparations for Homiletical Usage’ [where] the basic thrust of the chapter will be … principlization,’ the final task in the exegetical process” (150).

Part III outlines special issues in expository preaching such as the use of prophecy, narrative, and poetry respectively in chapters nine, ten, and eleven. Kaiser notes in chapter nine that while preacher should preach prophetically, he must take care not to preach solely against institutional and cultural structures. Old Testament prophets made their primary appeal “to the individuals who made up those communities and institutions” (187). In chapter ten, Kaiser notes, “What is needed in preaching on … narrative portions is some method of pointing out the abiding meanings and continuing significance for all believers” (197). Chapter eleven outlines how to preach Old Testament poetry expositionally, directing the preacher to know how “parallelism … is the dominant stylistic feature” (212).

The conclusion of this work is found in Part IV. Chapter 12, entitled “The Exegete/Pastor and the Power of God,” serves as the last chapter of this work and possesses a pastoral tone to the expositor in seeking the Holy Spirit for his power in the pulpit. “In all good conscience point to the presence of the Holy Spirit as the source of any confidence that we might have in our message even after we have acted most responsibly in the study and preparation of the text for proclamation” (235).

Critical Evaluation

As stated earlier, Kaiser’s aim in this work is to help bridge the gap between the hermeneutics and homiletics departments of our Bible colleges and seminaries in the area of biblical exegesis – and he succeeds! In the preface, Kaiser believes that in order for one to be a proper exegete of the Scriptures, he could not “hope to begin unless and until he is able to translate the text from Greek to Hebrew” (9). He grants though that many pastors, teachers, and missionaries are not able to partake of these educational opportunities. Given these issues, Kaiser notes that “the method expounded in this book can be profitably employed even if one has access only to a translated version of the Scriptures” (10). Kaiser finds a tremendous balance in providing solid help for those in all levels of biblical scholarship.

Kaiser’s work rightly advocates allowing the Scriptures to develop the framework for the preacher’s and the listener’s theology. First, he addresses in Chapter 1 the current crises in exegetical theology and notes the “yawning chasm between understanding the content of Scripture as it was given in the past and proclaiming it with such relevance in the present” (18). Kaiser notes, “We contend that the theology must be objectively derived from the text; not subjectively imposed on the text by the interpreter” (137). These impositions on the text also happen with narrative passages. He understands the temptations many preachers face and addresses them directly. “The exegete must resist the temptation to impose a mold over the text by forcing that text to answer one of his favorite questions or to deal with one of the contemporary issues that our cultures wants to have solved” (153).

His solution to this temptation involves determining the theme of each paragraph, looking for repeated terms which are stressed or defined, and looking to see what how these paragraphs fit into the overall book or section in which they are found. This theme runs continually through this work, reinforcing this all-to-important principle that the Christian’s theology must arise from the text. He rightly believes that a procedure must be in place to help understand the core meaning of the text will the preacher derive his theological framework. The interpreter accomplishes this analysis through studying the terms, events, quotes and covenants found in the text, engaging in a “full involvement of Biblical theology as part of our exegesis” (137).

His chapter on “The Definition and History of Exegesis” contains some excellent material which lays the groundwork for not only the rest of the work but for a career’s worth of work on the part of the exegete. He includes a wonderful paragraph that the preacher and exegete would do well to display in a prominent place for easy reference:

To begin with, let it be stated as a sort of first principle that preparation for preaching is always a movement which must begin with the text of Scripture and have as its goal the proclamation of that Word in such a way that it can be heard with all its poignancy and relevancy to the modern situation without dismissing one iota of its original normativeness (48).

He provides a helpful history of exegesis. Though this overview is not as comprehensive as Sidney Greidanus’ overview in Preaching Christ from the Old Testament (Eerdmans, 1999), its inclusion in this chapter immediately the section on the definition of exegesis bolsters Kaiser’s argument concerning the nature of good exegesis. For instance, Kaiser defines exegesis as seeking to “identify the single truth-intention of individual phrases, clauses, and sentences as they make up the thought of paragraphs, sections, and ultimately, entire books” (47). As he examines the five stages of Christian history, Kaiser wonderfully extracts the positives and negatives that arise from each stage of history and shows the lesson that deviating from authorial intent takes the interpreter down a problematic path — all the while showing the worthwhile intent behind such a method. He presents both sides, yet does not give too much ground to the incorrect view. The preacher and exegete will benefit from such a balanced presentation.

Another strength with Kaiser’s work is his use of humor and metaphors periodically in his explanations. This book contains technical information about the study of exegesis, so by Kaiser using humor and word pictures, he allows the reader slightly unwind as he absorbs the content. For instance, in chapter five in his discussion on verbal analysis, he discusses the importance of the surrounding words in determining the specific meaning of a word. With levity, he notes, that “words, like people, are known by the company they keep” (106). Another example is found in Chapter 6 when he uses a stirring metaphor in describing the trained clergy’s failure to connect biblical texts to today’s situations and their “Achilles’ heel” (131). The inclusion of these word pictures among the norm of dry, academic language that so pervades these types of works.

With the strengths found in this volume come the weaknesses. The most glaring weakness is the placement of the contents of chapter twelve. The topic of this chapter addresses the exegete/pastor and the power of God. In a quote above, Kaiser noted that for the pastor, the Holy Spirit is the source of confidence in our message regardless of the number of steps taken in preparation. Considering the importance of the presence of the Holy Spirit, Kaiser should have placed this chapter toward the beginning of this book rather than at the very last chapter. Jesus did not say, “Proper sermon preparation and exegetical work will teach you all things.” Rather, Jesus says in John 14:26, “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you” (John 14:26, ESV). Kaiser fully agrees with this verse. Given this sentiment, the placement of such an important understanding at the very end of this work is puzzling.

While Kaiser notes the importance of biblical truths guiding one’s theology, he strays from this philosophy not once but twice in reference to the same passage: 1 Corinthians 14:34-35. In making the point that the exegete should pay “close attention to each subtle nuance that may aid us in detecting sectional divisions” (77), he proceeds to engage in extra-biblical speculation. He wonders aloud, “Could it not be that the debated passage of 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 is a quote from Rabbinic law?” with no rationale on how he arrived at this point. He then proceeds to connect this passage with other passages from 1 Timothy 2:8-11 as well as 1 Corinthians 11:4-5. He also addresses these same verses on pp. 119-120, apparently to show how to apply the principles of verbal analysis. Kaiser violates his own principles for confuses Paul’s admonition in 1 Corinthians 11:4-5 with men and women who pray during their own private worship with principles Paul lays out for public worship in 1 Corinthians 14:26-35.

Conclusion

I would highly recommend Kaiser’s work as a good starting point in understanding how to construct a sermon that bridges the ancient text of Scripture to contemporary times. He correctly diagnoses the issues facing the contemporary preacher and then proceeds to help the preacher in a methodical fashion overcome the obstacles facing him in dealing with Old and New Testament exegetical problems. The pastor and seminarian will benefit greatly from the groundbreaking contribution.

Part I: You’re an Expository Preacher? Ohh!! — Take the Text On Its Own Terms

In For Preachers/Pastors, Preaching on January 10, 2007 at 5:03 pm

It Models How One Should Take the Text and Study It On Its Own Terms

Take the root word of expository:  expose.  Our desire is to take the text on its own terms.  Recently, someone commented that too many preachers have messages in search of a text. Praise God that he gives messages — just make sure those messages do justice to the text rather than simply doing justice to one’s pet topics. 

The New Testament makes it easy on the preacher to find the theme.  In fact, the Apostle Paul expertly introduces and unpacks theme upon theme in his epistles, leaving no doubt as to the direction.  One man on the pastor search committee which called me noted that the majority of applicates for the pastor preached from the Sermon on the Mount (myself included).  Why?  For me, as a young preacher, the theme was crystal clear.  One has to bring a lot of personal baggage to miss the themes in these passages.

Yet, there are other literary forms, aren’t there?  The historical narratives, the wisdom literature, the prophets — many times, they fail to contain nice, compact layout.  It takes work and prayer and study and prayer and wisdom … and prayer.  While we will deal with literary forms in Part 10, we must realize that the Bible consists of works in different genres such as history, narrative, poetry, prophetic, and apocalyptic language.  You cannot read history the same way you would poetry — history is more concrete while poetry often uses imagery to convey a concrete principle.  And so forth.  An understanding of the literary forms is crucial when taking the Scriptures on its own terms.

How Do We Take the Scriptures On Their Own Terms?

First, understand that this Book is an inspired Book.  God wrote it.  Yes, 66 books from 40 authors comprise this library known as the Holy Scriptures, but it has one author who inspired one book to show one strain of his redemptive work grounding in history.  The Bible is about how God progressively unfolds his plan to his people for his purpose and glory.  While as preachers and pastors we will deal with critics of the doctrine of inspiration who embrace worldviews such as liberalism, higher criticism, to the critics found in the emergent church who deny the certainty of knowledge in general and the Scriptures specifically — we hold to 2 Timothy 3:16 which says that “All Scripture is breathed out by God.”  The doctrine of inspiration is not a free pass to forsake studying these issues — but it provides the groundwork and the foundation to say, “Yes, God inspired this — and what I don’t understand, I know God gave it and will provide other Scriptures that I do understand to shed light on the ones I do not.”

Secondly, realize that the Scriptures are given by God as the sole mode of revealing himself.  A.W. Pink rightly notes:

God has given us a clear revelation of Himself in creation, in the constitution of man (physical, mental, and moral), in His government of this world (as evinced in the annals of history), in the advent to this earth of His incarnate Son, and in the Holy Scriptures.[source]

Once the doctrine of revelation (God revealing himself in the Scriptures) and inspiration (God breathed out the Scriptures) are undermined, liberalism and a general mistrust on the authority of the Scriptures result. It becomes a book of inspirational thoughts or simply a book to be critiqued and studied — but not one to be obeyed.

Steps Taken By the Expository Preacher Regarding the Text’s Seriousness

(1) Pray that the Holy Spirit opens your heart and mind to not only the authority and inspiration of His Word, but also to the sins in your heart which may hinder communion with Him. The Scriptures are infallible, but we are not. Pray that God would lead you toward Christlikeness — which is what he predestined us to in Christ (Romans 8:29).

(2) Pour over the Scriptures first. While commentaries are quite helpful (some are, I should say), one must approach the Scriptures first. One professor told the story of how he’d go as a teenager and raid his dad’s office when his dad served as a pastor. As he walked out of his dad’s office with an arm-full of books, his dad noted, “You know, son, the Bible is a pretty good book, too!” The Spirit gives us the Scriptures to help us interpret the Scriptures as well. Go there first.

(3) Go to the original languages. If you know Greek and Hebrew, use it. Get back to the originals. If you don’t, find a good computer program like BibleWorks or a Strong’s concordance for a greater understanding. While we may understand sufficiently in the English, all English translations are just that — translations.

(4) Go to the commentaries which hold to the Bible as the Word of God. Too many scholars write commentaries to debate whether what the Bible says is actually so. They embrace various critical methods which question the truthfulness of the Scriptures. Pastors don’t have time to engage in such nonsense. Go to the old commentaries like Calvin and Spurgeon and Luther who trust the Scriptures. Find more recent commentators like R. Kent Hughes, J.M. Boice, Phil Ryken, and Derek Kidner. Monergism.com also has a ton of links to sites containing solid resources to Bible-believing preachers and teachers.

(5) Read biographies of faithful expository preachers. Iain Murray’s biography on Martyn Lloyd-Jones, George Marsden’s biography on Jonathan Edwards, among others show you how the study and love of Scripture was not simply a professional endeavor, but a life-calling. These biographies will motivate preachers to the blessed pursuit of biblical study. Even sketches found at various places such as here and here are helpful.

(6) Get under good expositional preaching at a local church. Good expositional preachers will model how to study and how to take the text on its own terms. But notice I said “at a local church.” Academic institutions may be helpful, but preaching divorced from the local church context lacks true authenticity in that you are preaching to the untrained layperson. Study coupled with putting the fruit of that study on the ‘bottom shelf,’ if you will shows the relevance of expository preaching in general and study in particular in the life of the average Christian.

Part I: You’re an Expository Preacher? Ohh!! — Take the Text On Its Own Terms

In For Preachers/Pastors, Preaching on January 10, 2007 at 5:03 pm

It Models How One Should Take the Text and Study It On Its Own Terms

Take the root word of expository:  expose.  Our desire is to take the text on its own terms.  Recently, someone commented that too many preachers have messages in search of a text. Praise God that he gives messages — just make sure those messages do justice to the text rather than simply doing justice to one’s pet topics. 

The New Testament makes it easy on the preacher to find the theme.  In fact, the Apostle Paul expertly introduces and unpacks theme upon theme in his epistles, leaving no doubt as to the direction.  One man on the pastor search committee which called me noted that the majority of applicates for the pastor preached from the Sermon on the Mount (myself included).  Why?  For me, as a young preacher, the theme was crystal clear.  One has to bring a lot of personal baggage to miss the themes in these passages.

Yet, there are other literary forms, aren’t there?  The historical narratives, the wisdom literature, the prophets — many times, they fail to contain nice, compact layout.  It takes work and prayer and study and prayer and wisdom … and prayer.  While we will deal with literary forms in Part 10, we must realize that the Bible consists of works in different genres such as history, narrative, poetry, prophetic, and apocalyptic language.  You cannot read history the same way you would poetry — history is more concrete while poetry often uses imagery to convey a concrete principle.  And so forth.  An understanding of the literary forms is crucial when taking the Scriptures on its own terms.

How Do We Take the Scriptures On Their Own Terms?

First, understand that this Book is an inspired Book.  God wrote it.  Yes, 66 books from 40 authors comprise this library known as the Holy Scriptures, but it has one author who inspired one book to show one strain of his redemptive work grounding in history.  The Bible is about how God progressively unfolds his plan to his people for his purpose and glory.  While as preachers and pastors we will deal with critics of the doctrine of inspiration who embrace worldviews such as liberalism, higher criticism, to the critics found in the emergent church who deny the certainty of knowledge in general and the Scriptures specifically — we hold to 2 Timothy 3:16 which says that “All Scripture is breathed out by God.”  The doctrine of inspiration is not a free pass to forsake studying these issues — but it provides the groundwork and the foundation to say, “Yes, God inspired this — and what I don’t understand, I know God gave it and will provide other Scriptures that I do understand to shed light on the ones I do not.”

Secondly, realize that the Scriptures are given by God as the sole mode of revealing himself.  A.W. Pink rightly notes:

God has given us a clear revelation of Himself in creation, in the constitution of man (physical, mental, and moral), in His government of this world (as evinced in the annals of history), in the advent to this earth of His incarnate Son, and in the Holy Scriptures.[source]

Once the doctrine of revelation (God revealing himself in the Scriptures) and inspiration (God breathed out the Scriptures) are undermined, liberalism and a general mistrust on the authority of the Scriptures result. It becomes a book of inspirational thoughts or simply a book to be critiqued and studied — but not one to be obeyed.

Steps Taken By the Expository Preacher Regarding the Text’s Seriousness

(1) Pray that the Holy Spirit opens your heart and mind to not only the authority and inspiration of His Word, but also to the sins in your heart which may hinder communion with Him. The Scriptures are infallible, but we are not. Pray that God would lead you toward Christlikeness — which is what he predestined us to in Christ (Romans 8:29).

(2) Pour over the Scriptures first. While commentaries are quite helpful (some are, I should say), one must approach the Scriptures first. One professor told the story of how he’d go as a teenager and raid his dad’s office when his dad served as a pastor. As he walked out of his dad’s office with an arm-full of books, his dad noted, “You know, son, the Bible is a pretty good book, too!” The Spirit gives us the Scriptures to help us interpret the Scriptures as well. Go there first.

(3) Go to the original languages. If you know Greek and Hebrew, use it. Get back to the originals. If you don’t, find a good computer program like BibleWorks or a Strong’s concordance for a greater understanding. While we may understand sufficiently in the English, all English translations are just that — translations.

(4) Go to the commentaries which hold to the Bible as the Word of God. Too many scholars write commentaries to debate whether what the Bible says is actually so. They embrace various critical methods which question the truthfulness of the Scriptures. Pastors don’t have time to engage in such nonsense. Go to the old commentaries like Calvin and Spurgeon and Luther who trust the Scriptures. Find more recent commentators like R. Kent Hughes, J.M. Boice, Phil Ryken, and Derek Kidner. Monergism.com also has a ton of links to sites containing solid resources to Bible-believing preachers and teachers.

(5) Read biographies of faithful expository preachers. Iain Murray’s biography on Martyn Lloyd-Jones, George Marsden’s biography on Jonathan Edwards, among others show you how the study and love of Scripture was not simply a professional endeavor, but a life-calling. These biographies will motivate preachers to the blessed pursuit of biblical study. Even sketches found at various places such as here and here are helpful.

(6) Get under good expositional preaching at a local church. Good expositional preachers will model how to study and how to take the text on its own terms. But notice I said “at a local church.” Academic institutions may be helpful, but preaching divorced from the local church context lacks true authenticity in that you are preaching to the untrained layperson. Study coupled with putting the fruit of that study on the ‘bottom shelf,’ if you will shows the relevance of expository preaching in general and study in particular in the life of the average Christian.

Last Call to Help with Books for Trinidadian Pastors

In Uncategorized on January 8, 2007 at 10:11 pm

Thanks to all of you who have gone to our Amazon.com Wishlist for Trinidadian Pastors.  We will close the wishlist tomorrow.  Since we leave on the 22nd, we want to give the books plenty of time to arrive so they may be packed and distributed.

I have left only eight books on the wishlist — all of them dealing with marriage and family issues.  Since a marriage conference will be held, these books would be very helpful to these Trinidadian families as well.  Please consider helping.  January 9th (my dad’s 73rd birthday) will be the final day.

Thanks again!!!

You’re an Expository Preacher? Ohhh!

In Preaching on January 7, 2007 at 8:25 pm

During a hospital visit last fall, I happened to run into another pastor whom I met through my parents some time back.  He is a retired pastor who preaches on an interim basis in various churches who are in-between pastors.  I, being relatively young in the ministry, would spend more time listening to this man than I would talking. 

The conversation turned when he asked me where I was serving and in what other endeavors I was engaged.  I told him, adding that I was ready to finish up seminary work.  “Oh!  What are you working toward?”  I replied, “A DMin in the field of Expository Preaching.”  “Expository preaching?  What exactly is that?”  I explained briefly that it is a type of preaching that takes the theme of the text and makes it the theme of the sermon — exposing the theme, if you will.  His response? 

He just looked at me.  I continued on that it takes a look at each word of the Scriptures verse-by-verse.  I felt he was being rather polite, otherwise I fear he would have questioned whether such a style of preaching was helpful. 

Many question the necessity of expository preaching.  It sounds dry, dusty, academic, and irrelevant.  With people trying to keep marriages together, raise kids, invest for retirement, pay off bills, and a myriad of other day-to-day issues, why not address these issues rather than going verse-by-verse through a biblical book.  Talk about a certain relevant topic! 

Having been in ministry almost 15 years and now going into my ninth year of teaching ministry (youth pastor and pastor), I am now convinced of a number of reasons for preaching in a expositional manner.

(1)  It models how one should take the text seriously and to study it therein.

(2) It forces you (and your listeners) to deal with topics that you would risk avoiding otherwise.

(3) It often bypasses “felt needs” and addresses “real needs.”

(4) It helps the preacher and the listener see the Bible as a whole rather than simple snippets as prooftexts to support a particular topic.

(5) Along with (4), it helps the preacher and the listener see the harmony among the verses, paragraphs, chapters, books, and Testaments and demonstrate the unity of the Scriptures.

(6) It models how clear the Scriptures are once studied on the Spirit’s terms rather than our own.

(7) It puts Christ on display throughout the Scriptures.

(8) It shows how the Scriptures are grounded in history (places, events, times, people).

(9) It puts God’s progressive relevation on display, showing God’s work in redemptive history and shows how history is truly HIS-story. 

(10) It forces the preacher and the listener to deal with the various literary forms found in the Scriptures (history, narrative, poetry, the epistles, and apocalyptic genres) and, in turn, forces the preacher/listener to understand these genres for correct interpretation and understanding.

There are more, but over the next few weeks, I will expand on each of these.

You’re an Expository Preacher? Ohhh!

In Preaching on January 7, 2007 at 8:25 pm

During a hospital visit last fall, I happened to run into another pastor whom I met through my parents some time back.  He is a retired pastor who preaches on an interim basis in various churches who are in-between pastors.  I, being relatively young in the ministry, would spend more time listening to this man than I would talking. 

The conversation turned when he asked me where I was serving and in what other endeavors I was engaged.  I told him, adding that I was ready to finish up seminary work.  “Oh!  What are you working toward?”  I replied, “A DMin in the field of Expository Preaching.”  “Expository preaching?  What exactly is that?”  I explained briefly that it is a type of preaching that takes the theme of the text and makes it the theme of the sermon — exposing the theme, if you will.  His response? 

He just looked at me.  I continued on that it takes a look at each word of the Scriptures verse-by-verse.  I felt he was being rather polite, otherwise I fear he would have questioned whether such a style of preaching was helpful. 

Many question the necessity of expository preaching.  It sounds dry, dusty, academic, and irrelevant.  With people trying to keep marriages together, raise kids, invest for retirement, pay off bills, and a myriad of other day-to-day issues, why not address these issues rather than going verse-by-verse through a biblical book.  Talk about a certain relevant topic! 

Having been in ministry almost 15 years and now going into my ninth year of teaching ministry (youth pastor and pastor), I am now convinced of a number of reasons for preaching in a expositional manner.

(1)  It models how one should take the text seriously and to study it therein.

(2) It forces you (and your listeners) to deal with topics that you would risk avoiding otherwise.

(3) It often bypasses “felt needs” and addresses “real needs.”

(4) It helps the preacher and the listener see the Bible as a whole rather than simple snippets as prooftexts to support a particular topic.

(5) Along with (4), it helps the preacher and the listener see the harmony among the verses, paragraphs, chapters, books, and Testaments and demonstrate the unity of the Scriptures.

(6) It models how clear the Scriptures are once studied on the Spirit’s terms rather than our own.

(7) It puts Christ on display throughout the Scriptures.

(8) It shows how the Scriptures are grounded in history (places, events, times, people).

(9) It puts God’s progressive relevation on display, showing God’s work in redemptive history and shows how history is truly HIS-story. 

(10) It forces the preacher and the listener to deal with the various literary forms found in the Scriptures (history, narrative, poetry, the epistles, and apocalyptic genres) and, in turn, forces the preacher/listener to understand these genres for correct interpretation and understanding.

There are more, but over the next few weeks, I will expand on each of these.

Do Not Judge a Minister …

In For Preachers/Pastors on January 3, 2007 at 1:21 pm

“Consider carefully what you hear.” Mark 4:24

It is sad to see how many preachers in our days, make it their business to enrich men’s heads with high, empty, airy notions; instead of enriching their souls with saving
truths.

Fix yourself under that man’s ministry, who makes it his business, his work to enrich the soul, to win the soul, and to build up the soul; not to tickle the ear, or please the fancy. This age is full of such light, delirious souls–who dislike everything–but what is empty and airy.

Do not judge a minister . . .
by his voice, nor
by the multitude who follow him, nor
by his affected tone, nor
by his rhetoric and flashes of wit;
but by the holiness, heavenliness, and spiritualness
of his teaching. Many ministers are like empty orators,
who have a flood of words–but a drop of matter.

Some preachers affect rhetorical strains; they seek abstrusities, and love to hover and soar aloft in dark and cloudy expressions, and so shoot their arrows over their hearers’ heads–instead of bettering their hearers’ hearts. Mirthful things in a sermon are only for men to gaze upon and admire. He is the best preacher, not who tickles the ear–but who breaks the heart.

“My message and my preaching were not with wise and persuasive words, but with a demonstration of the Spirit’s power, so that your faith might not rest on men’s wisdom,
but on God’s power.” 1 Corinthians 2:4-5

(Please forward this on to your pastors and teachers!)From:

Grace Gems (choice electronic books, sermons & quotes)

Sovereign Grace Treasures (choice printed books)

Update on Books for Trinidadian Pastors (1.2.07)

In Missions, Trinidad & Tobago on January 2, 2007 at 4:17 pm

Praise God — two more books have been purchased from our Amazon.com Trinidadian Pastors Wishlist for our upcoming missions trip at the end of the month.  I am leaving this wishlist open until Tuesday, January 9.

I have gone through and removed a number of books so that only 26 are left.  I am conducting a Marriage Conference there, so if there are some of you who feel led to contribute, could you please contribute a purchase of book dealing with marriage.  Books by Norman Wright, Gary Smalley, John Piper, Daniel Akin, Gary Chapman, and C.J. Mahaney have wonderful books in this area.

Yet whatever you have to contribute will be a blessing.  Have a wonderful New Year!

Here are the books purchased thus far:

  • Systematic Theology by Wayne Grudem
  • Preaching and Teaching with Imagination by Warren Wiersbe
  • Seven Laws of the Learner by Bruce Wilkinson
  • Paul & His Letters by John Polhill
  • Leadership 101 by John Maxwell
  • 9 Marks of a Healthy Church by Mark Dever
  • Exegetical Fallacies by D.A. Carson
  • Preaching and Preachers by D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones
  • The Supremacy of God in Preaching by John Piper
  • The Difficult Doctrine of the Love of God by D.A. Carson
  • The Reformed Pastor by Richard Baxter
  • Shepherding the Small Church by Glenn Daman
  • Why One Way?  by John MacArthur
  • The MacArthur Study Bible (NASB)

God bless all of you!

Have You Considered Your Ways? (Haggai 1:1-15)

In Sermons on January 2, 2007 at 3:21 pm

America treasures prosperity and comfort almost to a fault.  Steve Farrar included a rather humorous little poem in his book Family Survival Guide in the American Jungle:

 

 Now I lay me down to sleep,

I pray my Cuisinart to keep.

I pray my stocks are on the rise

And that my analyst is wise.

That all the wine I sip is white

And that my hot tub’s watertight.

That racquetball won’t get too tough,

That all my sushi’s fresh enough.

I pray my cordless phone still works;

That my career won’t lose its perks;

My microwave won’t radiate;

My condo won’t depreciate.

I pray my health club doesn’t close

And that my money market grows

If I go broke before I wake

I pray my Volvo they won’t take.[1]

Many in our culture would smile over this little verse — mainly because this hits rather close to home.  So many today willingly and lavishly spend money on personal desires in order to better their current situations.  If you go into our bookstores the largest sections in our bookstores are ones that deal with money-related matters.  Books upon books answer questions such as dealing with broadening your portfolio, climbing the corporate ladder, preparing for retirement, saving to put your children through college, buying that dream home with “all the fixins” — and the list goes on.  We even fixate on the mundane matters of life and elevate them into crisis decisions.

haggai.jpgThis morning, we come to a book of the Bible many of us may not have read or even heard of — the book of Haggai.  Haggai is the second shortest book of the Old Testament behind Obadiah.  We know of Haggai served as a prophet during an incredibly crucial time in the life of the people of Israel. In Ezra 5:1-2, we read:

Now the prophets, Haggai and Zechariah the son of Iddo, prophesied to the Jews who were in Judah and Jerusalem, in the name of the God of Israel who was over them.  Then Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel and Jeshua the son of Jozadak arose and began to rebuild the house of God that is in Jerusalem, and the prophets of God were with them, supporting them (Ezra 5:1-2, ESV).

Haggai prophesied during the time when God moved Cyrus and later Darius, king of Babylon, to allow the Israelite exiles in Babylon to return to Jerusalem to rebuild the Temple.  Yet as they rebuilt the Temple, they met stiff opposition from all sides, especially the Samaritans.  They grew discouraged and stopped the work — the work for which God had sent them back to Jerusalem.  They quit the work at around 536-535 B.C.  God raised up Haggai in the second year of King Darius’ reign around 520 B.C. to stir them out of their complacency, help them see their spiritual condition in the midst of their circumstances, and to urge them to find pleasure in pleasing God rather than padding their wallets and their own personal situations.   

God beckons us through his prophet to consider our ways.  He never once tells his people that they would never face opposition.  What he promised was strength to persevere in the midst of them.  Out of God’s love and mercy, he sends his prophets and preachers to remind his people of his faithfulness — and in turn, to remind them as his people to be faithful and obedient as well.  Even though the book of Haggai is found in the Old Testament, the principles here are not simply for ‘Old Testament’ peoples, but for all the people of God.  When God’s people remain unfaithful, his blessing leaves us — whether in the Old Testament or the New Testament.  God’s blessing comes when his people consider their ways and by his Spirit line those ways up with those of God.

Have You Considered Your Complacency at the Expense of Your Calling?

            Haggai 1:1-4 reads as follows:

In the second year of Darius the king, in the sixth month, on the first day of the month, the word of the Lord came by the hand of Haggai the prophet to Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, governor of Judah, and to Joshua the son of Jehozadak, the high priest:  “Thus says the Lord of hosts: These people say the time has not yet come to rebuild the house of the Lord.”  Then the word of the Lord came by the hand of Haggai the prophet, “Is it a time for you yourselves to dwell in your paneled houses, while this house lies in ruins (Haggai 1:1-4, ESV)?

God called his prophet to confront some rather influential people amongst Israel:  Zerubbabel, the governor of Judah; and Joshua, the high priest.  He confronts them with the mindset of the Israelite culture after their providential return back to Jerusalem.  “These people say the time has not yet come to rebuild the house of the Lord” (Haggai 1:2, ESV).   Clearly, they operated by their own timetable, not God’s.  In Ezra 1:2-4, we read:

Thus says Cyrus king of Persia: The LORD, the God of heaven, has given me all the kingdoms of the earth, and he has charged me to build him a house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah.  Whoever is among you of all his people, may his God be with him, and let him go up to Jerusalem, which is in Judah, and rebuild the house of the LORD, the God of Israel— he is the God who is in Jerusalem.  And let each survivor, in whatever place he sojourns, be assisted by the men of his place with silver and gold, with goods and with beasts, besides freewill offerings for the house of God that is in Jerusalem (Ezra 1:2-4, ESV).

Notice who spoke this:  Cyris king of Persia.  He, a Babylonian king no less, understood that God charged him to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem.  Ezra 1:7 says that Cyrus even brought out the Temple furniture that Nebuchadnezzar had carried away for them to refurnish God’s house.  God worked to bring them back!

So why had they stopped?  The reasons (read: excuses) were too numerous to count. They received great opposition from the inhabitants in the land.  Plus, considering how they were struggling economically and financially, they may have felt the country lacked the strength to undertake such a grand project.  Discouragement ensued among the people.  “Then the people of the land discouraged the people of Judah and made them afraid to build, and bribed counselors against them to frustrate their purpose, all the days of Cyrus king of Persia, even until the reign of Darius, king of Persia” (Ezra 4:4-5).  They grew discouraged, their leaders grew corrupt, they grew complacent.   It just became too difficult for them to persevere and they lost their desire.  So according to Ezra’s account, they rebuilt the altar but nothing else.  Sadly, as Haggai reminds them, they had plenty of energy and desire and money to build their own houses.  He notes that their houses were “paneled,” which is “a sign of ornamentation and luxury”[2]

Many of you here understand that.  You knew of God’s calling in a certain area, you saw the need, and you began the work.   You know God calls you to witness, but excuses arise as to why now is just not the time or your fear discourages you.  You may have found yourself doing the work with little or no help and discouragement sets in.  You know you need to give, but you have a house to work on or bills to pay or a vacation you want to take or you cite the struggling economy.  Maybe you grow discouraged because you receive little appreciation for what you do.  Maybe your relatives sneered at you for spending so much time doing ‘church stuff.’  Whatever the reason, the result is the same — discouragement followed by complacency followed by disobedience.  Have you considered your complacency for the Lord’s work?  When complacency sets in, God steps in with his messengers to jar us out of that valley.

Have You Considered Your Condition in the Midst of Your Need?

Now, therefore, thus says the Lord of hosts: Consider your ways.  You have sown much, and harvested little. You eat, but you never have enough; you drink, but you never have your fill. You clothe yourselves, but no one is warm. And he who earns wages does so to put them into a bag with holes (Haggai 1:5-6, ESV).

As you stand on the precipice of 2007, you have likely evaluated the events and circumstances that confronted you in 2006.  I will not presume to list all the possibilities, but likely listed among those possibilities is how better to budget your money — or how better to blossom your portfolio to give yourself more of a financial cushion.  Why?  This past year may have been difficult on you financially.  You may be like the majority where you are having trouble making ends meet, as they say.  The reason may not be due to budgets or bad investments.  There may be another.

God speaks through Haggai and says, “Consider your ways.”  They eat, but are not full.  They drink, but they never quench their thirst.  They do not have enough clothing.  They bring in a paycheck, but the money seems to vanish.  God even sent a drought, mentioned in Haggai 1:11.   The reason these issues happened was due to their unfaithfulness.  They failed to be satisfied with what God provided for them.  They worked and worked, but that never lowered their discouragement.  God would not bless them with more unless they stayed faithful with the resources God already gave them.  Charles Spurgeon once noted, “If men are selfish and keep their wealth to themselves, and rob God of his portion, they shall not prosper, or if they do, no blessing shall come of it.”[3]

Many of you listening this morning may say I sound like those televangelists who preach that God will bless you with health, wealth, and prosperity if you have plenty of faith — and if you don’t, you’ll be poor or struggle with bodily illnesses.  Haggai seems to say this, no?  Consider Mark Dever’s thoughts on the matter?

Consider your life and consider how you give, Haggai says.  Why should God entrust his wealth to you?  What do you do with it?  What if he created the wealth he has given you specifically to do good things in his creation, but instead of beinga  highway of blessing, you have become the dead end for the wealth he gave?  Why would he give you any more?  Pray for the grace of God to lead you and to teach you from his Word what to do with your money.[4]

The ultimate point of this passage is not about building programs Old Testament-style specifically or about giving in general.  The ultimate point lies in your attitude and your obedience to God.  Do you love him?  Do you delight in him above all? 

 Have You Considered Pleasing Yourself More So Than Pleasing Him?

 Thus says the Lord of hosts: Consider your ways.  Go up to the hills and bring wood and build the house, that I may take pleasure in it and that I may be glorified, says the Lord.  You looked for much, and behold, it came to little. And when you brought it home, I blew it away. Why? declares the Lord of hosts. Because of my house that lies in ruins, while each of you busies himself with his own house.  Therefore the heavens above you have withheld the dew, and the earth has withheld its produce. And I have called for a drought on the land and the hills, on the grain, the new wine, the oil, on what the ground brings forth, on man and beast, and on all their labors” (Haggai 1:7-11, ESV).

 Again, God commands his people to consider and evaluate their ways.  They derived more pleasure in their own ways than in God’s ways.  God never desired for us to find pleasure in something other than himself.  In fact, the true sign of being right with God is that your pleasures and delights are met when they are the delights God has as well. 

When God calls us to repentance, he is not merely calling for a change of mind or a change of philosophy that remains internal.  Repentance is a call to action.  He says, “Consider your ways.  Go up to the hills and bring wood and build the house.”  Four imperatives in these two short sentences:  consider, go, bring, build.  Notice, too, the rationale:  “that I may take pleasure in it and that I may be glorified, says the Lord” (Haggai 1:7).  God desires that our pleasures and his pleasures are the same.  He desired a house as a testimony to the nations that God is still among his people and active in the world, and as a reminder to the people of Israel that God kept the covenant he established with Abraham.  God wanted his people to see this.  God desires his people to see him as a priority.  Psalm 37:1-4says:   

         Fret not yourself because of evildoers;

         be not envious of wrongdoers!

         For they will soon fade like the grass

         and wither like the green herb.

         Trust in the Lord, and do good;

         dwell in the land and befriend faithfulness.

         Delight yourself in the Lord,

         and he will give you the desires of your heart (Psalm 37:1-4, ESV).

The people of Israel focused and fretted more on the evildoers who discouraged them than on the God who dispatched them from Israel.  Yet when God urges them to do what they do, notice that his first motive is not so they would get a better return on their investments or enjoy their food and drink or any other earthly reason.  His rationale is that he may be find pleasure in these acts and that these acts would bring him glory. 

When bring self pleasure takes precedence over bring God pleasure, we will find ourselves not simply missing God’s blessing but soon under God’s judgment.  This mindset is the basic definition of pride.  Moses understood this.  The writer of Hebrews notes:

By faith Moses, when he was grown up, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter, choosing rather to be mistreated with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin.  He considered the reproach of Christ greater wealth than all the treasures of Egypt, for he was looking to the reward” (Hebrews 11:24-26, ESV). 

Moses, who serves as one of the titanic characters in Old Testament history, serves also as a great example for God’s people.  He preferred facing derision and disdain than to enjoy any fleeting pleasure or treasure earth offered.  The “reproach of Christ” was “greater wealth” (Hebrews 11:26, ESV) because he persevered to what awaited him. 

Have You Considered Your Cure in the Midst of Your Culture?

Then Zerubbabel the son of She-altiel, and Joshua the son of Jehozadak, the high priest, with all the remnant of the people, obeyed the voice of the Lord their God, and the words of Haggai the prophet, as the Lord their God had sent him. And the people feared the Lord.  Then Haggai, the messenger of the Lord, spoke to the people with the Lord’s message, “I am with you, declares the Lord.”  And the Lord stirred up the spirit of Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, governor of Judah, and the spirit of Joshua the son of Jehozadak, the high priest, and the spirit of all the remnant of the people. And they came and worked on the house of the Lord of hosts, their God,  on the twenty-fourth day of the month, in the sixth month, in the second year of Darius the king (Haggai 1:12-15, ESV). 

In his commentary on Haggai, John Calvin noted so insightfully:

    

Let us … learn, that princes and those to whom God has committed the care of governing his Church never so faithfully perform their office, nor discharge their duties so courageously and strenuously, but that they stand in need of being roused, and, as it were, stimulated by many goads.[5]

We may resist people coming in and condemning us in an area that falls short of God’s standard — but does that say more about us than anything?  Is this reaction the result of a hardened heart?  Fortunately, Zerubbabel and Joshua the high priest did not possess a hardened heart.  As we read earlier from Ezra 5:1-2, they led the people to conduct the work of rebuilding the Temple.  Yet, like the rest of the remnant, they too became complacent and the rest simply followed their lead.

Praise God that he continues to send his preachers with his message to stir up his people — and with that he sends his presence!  We see the man side of the issue when Haggai 1:12 notes how Zerubbabel and Joshua “obeyed the voice of the Lord” (Haggai 1:12, ESV).  In verse 14, however, we notice that “the LORD stirred up the spirit of Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, governor of Judah, and the spirit of Joshua the son of Jehozadak, the high priest, and the spirit of all the remnant of the people” (Haggai 1:14, ESV).   

God moved Haggai to preach to the remnant in Israel who were moved by the word and the Spirit to build.  In Ezra 6:14, we see when they finished building the Temple after Haggai began preaching: 

And the elders of the Jews built and prospered through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo. They finished their building by decree of the God of Israel and by decree of Cyrus and Darius and Artaxerxes king of Persia;  [15] and this house was finished on the third day of the month of Adar, in the sixth year of the reign of Darius the king (Ezra 6:14-15, ESV).

Notice the timeframe:  Haggai began preaching “in the second year of Darius the king, in the sixth month, on the first day of the month” (Ezra 1:1a, ESV).  The temple’s completion landed on the “third day of the month of Adar, in the sixth year of the reign of Darius the king” (Ezra 6:15, ESV).  Using our calendar, Haggai stopped preaching in December of 520 B.C. and the Temple was completed just over three years later in March 516 B.C.  How glorious it is to see God’s people repent and respond to the Word of God with obedience!

Conclusion

Right now, 2006 will end in about twelve hours and will soon be in our rearview mirror.  2007 is upon us.  Are we willing to examine ourselves and truly consider our ways?  Are we willing to examine how we spend our time, our money, our energies on the things of God?   As you consider your ways, consider the words of this hymn by Frances Ridley Havergal (1836-1879):

Another year is dawning,

Dear Father let it be,

In working or in waiting,

Another year with thee.

Another year of progress,

Another year of praise,

Another year of proving

Thy presence all the days.

Another year of mercies,

Of faithfulness and grace,

Another year of gladness,

The glory of thy face.

Another year of leaning

Upon thy loving breast,

Another year of trusting,

Of quiet, happy rest.

Another year of service,

Of witness for thy love,

Another year of training

For holier work above.

Another year is dawning,

Dear Father, let it be,

On earth, or else in heaven,

Another year for thee.[6]

 



 

[1]Steve Farrar, Family Survival in the American Jungle (Sisters, OR: Multnomah Press, 1991), 63.

 

[2]Ralph L. Smith.  Micah-Malachi:  Word Biblical Commentary, Volume 32 (Waco, TX:  Word, 1984), 153.

[3]Charles Haddon Spurgeon.  Spurgeon’s Devotional Bible (Grand Raids, MI: Baker, 1964), 460. 


[4]Mark Dever.  Promises Made: The Message of the Old Testament.

[5]John Calvin.  Commentaries on Haggai * * * 

[6] Frances Ridley Havergal.  Another Year is Dawning (Public Domain).

Can You Avoid These Cliches?

In For Preachers/Pastors on January 1, 2007 at 10:54 pm

In a recent issue of the Business Common Sense newsletter, Deny Hatch writes: To celebrate its 25th anniversary, the Plain English Campaign surveyed 5,000 supporters in 70 countries. They voted on the most irritating phrase in the language. The results:

* 1. At the end of the day
* 2. At this moment in time
* 3. The constant use of like as if it were a form of punctuation
* 4. With all due respect

From the Plain English press release: Spokesman John Lister said over-used phrases were a barrier to communication. “When readers or listeners come across these tired expressions, they start tuning out and completely miss the message — assuming there is one! Using these terms in daily business is about as professional as wearing a novelty tie or having a wacky ring tone on your phone.

“George Orwell’s advice from 1946 is still worth following: ‘Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.’”

Other over-used phrase nominations from the Plain English survey:

* 24/7
* absolutely
* address the issue
* around (in place of “about”)
* awesome
* ballpark figure
* basically
* basis (“on a weekly basis” in place of “weekly” and so on)
* bear with me
* between a rock and a hard place
* blue sky (thinking)
* boggles the mind
* bottom line
* crack troops
* glass half full (or half empty)
* going forward
* I hear what you’re saying . . .
* in terms of . . .
* it’s not rocket science
* literally
* move the goal-posts
* ongoing
* prioritize
* pushing the envelope
* singing from the same hymn sheet
* the fact of the matter is
* thinking outside the box
* to be honest/to be honest with you/to be perfectly honest
* touch base
* up to (in place of “about”)
* value-added (in general use)

(Business Common Sense, 12/14/06)

(HT: Preaching Now, Vol. 1, no. 6)