Matthew R. Perry

Archive for March, 2007

Taking Every Day With My Dad as a Gift!

In Uncategorized on March 31, 2007 at 10:07 am

Yesterday, my family and I drove to North Carolina to spend a few days with my mom, dad, my sister and her family, and my brother and his family. In case you are new to this blog, my dad sustained some rather serious injuries. He’s had a very difficult road since then.

I’m here this weekend for Dad’s Welcome Home Party to take place today at 5:00 p.m. I know, I know — he came home on December 26th, but this is the first time all of us are able to get together to celebrate.

I am so thankful for every day I have with him. I used to call him about three times a week. Now I call him every single day unless something comes up — then I usually call him twice the next day! On September 18, I did not know whether he would be around. Now that he is, every day with him is a gift.

He is supposed to have surgery sometime in July 19 to reverse an iliastomy. Please keep him prayer.

Kragthorpe Era Begins for Louisville Football

In Uncategorized on March 29, 2007 at 10:14 pm

Being a part of the readership of this blog (glory to God you’re here — thank you!), you will have to deal with reading about the teams for which I root — in this case, the Louisville Cardinals. Given their recent success under Bobby Petrino who left to coach the NFL’s Atlanta Falcons, I’m curious to see how Steve Kragthorpe handles the pressure cooker.

I think he’ll be fine. An excerpt from a recent AP article:

National championship hopes. A Heisman Trophy hopeful quarterback. A burgeoning fan base and at least six nationally televised games so the whole country can see how the new coach is doing.

Sure, there’s pressure for Steve Kragthorpe to win right away at Louisville. Then again, it’s nothing compared to the situation he entered when he took over at Tulsa in 2003.

“When you walk in at Tulsa and they tell you if you don’t win in three years they are dropping football, that’s pressure,” he said.

Kragthorpe responded by leading the once struggling Golden Hurricane to three bowl games in four seasons. To succeed at Louisville, he knows he’ll have to do even better than that. He’ll get his first up-close look at what he has to work with on Friday when the defending Big East champions open spring practice.

Click here to read the rest of this AP article.

powered by performancing firefox

What Can Wash Away My Sin? (Psalm 51)

In Homosexuality, Preaching, Sermons on March 29, 2007 at 12:53 pm

Preached on Sunday, March 25, 2007
Boone’s Creek Baptist Church, Lexington, KY

This just in: there is someone in leadership in our country that possess moral conviction. In our culture, that is newsworthy!

I wonder how many people had ever heard of Peter Pace before he made headlines this past week. What is a shame is that this man is our nation’s top military officer, a veteran decorated 48 times over, a distinguished military career. Yet, that alone is not newsworthy enough. On what matter does General Pace have conviction?

His interview with the Chicago Tribune noted this:

My upbringing is such that I believe that there are certain things, certain types of conduct that are immoral. I believe that military members who sleep with other military members’ wives are immoral in their conduct, and that we should not tolerate that. I believe that homosexual acts between individuals are immoral and that we should not condone immoral acts.

If you read the papers and see the news on the web, you would believe that General Pace spoke only of homosexuality, but he spoke of all types of immorality and put them on the same level. Whatever his worldview on life, clearly part of that worldview is, but what is clear is that he does not believe sinful or immoral behavior is right and it should not be tolerated among military personnel.

What a tragedy when we come to a point when someone makes a statement like that — and its newsworthy! When Dr. Albert Mohler of Southern Seminary was on Larry King Live not too long ago dealing with the question of homosexuality in the church, one other panelist who was also a clergywoman noted how her relationship with her female companion was “holy and completely natural to her and that she was being who God made her to be.” Dr. Mohler responded by saying, “I have a great sympathy for everyone who desires to have a relationship with God, but that only comes through Jesus Christ — and the gospel is about repenting of sin, not celebrating it!” What an important conviction to have — we must deal with our sin, not tolerate it. We must call sin by what it is — rebellion against a holy God. We must be desperate to kill sin or, as John Owen has said, ‘sin will be killing’ us.

Psalm 51 shows a desperation as David deals with his sin. David, a man after God’s own heart, found himself in a situation in which so many men find themselves. In 2 Samuel 11, it tells of a battle in which the people of Israel were engaged, yet at the end it says, “But David remain at Jerusalem” (2 Samuel 11:1, ESV). When we are idle when it comes to the duty God places before us, sin cannot help but transpire. If we’re not following our Father, we’re following our flesh. David gazed out, saw Bathsheba — the wife of Uriah, one of David’s mighty men — bathing. He sent for her, had relations, then tried to hide it by sending for Uriah from the front telling him to go home. Uriah refused and slept at the door of David’s palace. David then sent Uriah to the front of the battle, where he was killed. Once Bathsheba finished with the prescribed time of grieving, David immediately brought her into his house and made her his wife and bore him a son.

So getting back to Psalm 51, you see the title: “To the Choirmaster. A Psalm of David, when Nathan the prophet went to him, after he had on in to Bathsheba.” Nathan, through a clever story, informed David of God’s view of his sin. The consequences? Nathan prophesied that, “Now therefore the sword shall never depart from your house, because you have despised me. … I will raise up evil against you out of your own house. … For you did it secretly, but I will do this thing before all Israel and before the sun.” When David confessed his sin, Nathan said, “The Lord also has put away your sin, you shall not die. Nevertheless, because by this deed you have utterly scored the LORD, the child who is born to you shall die” (see 2 Samuel 12).

Sin is serious business. Rebelling against the living God has serious consequences. Let us learn the lessons from Psalm 51.

1. Until we see our need for help, we will not treasure his hope (Psalm 51:1-6).

We laugh at the jokes where men are driving and are notorious for refusing to ask for directions when everyone in the car knows they are lost. The reason we tend not to ask is that we always tend to believe we know our way out of the situation. We try to play it cool and stay collected. It is only when we are at the end of our proverbial rope do we even think about asking. We’ll not ask for help as long as we believe we can get out of our predicament.

I believe many people reject the idea of sin because they reject the idea that they need help — and thus discount the hope that God provides. David was desperate for help because Nathan confronted him about his sin and because he was under conviction of his sin. What’s the nature of this sin?

Notice he begs God to blot out his transgressions, to wash him thoroughly from his iniquity, and to cleanse him from his sin. By using these terms, David was a student in understanding all the angles of sin. He knew better than to say that sin is simple some mistakes one makes. It’s much more serious. Transgressions comes with the understanding of crossing a boundary God has set between the holy and unholy. Iniquity is an understanding of our original sin — that we were born depraved (which is what David notes in Psalm 51:5, “Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.” The term ‘sin’ in verse 2 deals with a falling short, much like what Paul noted in Romans 3:23, “For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.”

As he gets to verse 3, he says, “I know my transgressions, my sin is ever before me.” That is good! It is good to know not only that you have cross a boundary, but that you know where the boundary is! With all the hubbub from General Pace’s comments, our culture tends to avoid the boundary — and anyone who says there is a boundary gets shouted down. We applaud those who say we are more enlightened and have moved on from those boundaries. Yet we must be careful.

So many try to avoid what sin looks like, but they also try to avoid whom their sin is against! When we pollute, we think it is just affecting the next generation. When we commit sexual sin, we think it’s just against us or the one we’re with or against our spouse or future spouse. We think, when we have a rift with someone, we think it’s just against someone. But know for certain who you have sinned against.

“Against you and you only have I sinned and done what is evil in your sight.” How can David say this? We sin against a lot of people. The sins are our responsibility. Yes, that’s true — but how do you know what a sin is? How do you know where that boundary is? How do you know you have fallen short? You know because God is the one who sets the boundaries — and God is the one from whose glory we have fallen short! And even if you just look at how David sinned against Bathsheba and Uriah, those two and everyone on earth are made in God’s image.

2. Untill we treasure his hope, we will not know true joy (Psalm 51:7-12).

We cannot experience true joy in anything while we are still in our sin. What is sad is that so many believe they can. But the bar is set too low. We think he have joy, but it will be like counterfeit money. It may look real, even feel real. You may even fool others and spend that money … but at the end of the day, it’s not real and will be deemed worthless.

Psalm 51:8 says, “Let me hear joy and gladness; let the bones that you have broken rejoice.” Verse 12 also says, “Restore to me the joy of your salvation.” Where is this joy coming from? Look at verse 7: “Purge me with hyssop and I shall be clean; wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow.” The word ‘purge’ literally means to ‘de-sin’ me. David’s heart was so broken over his sin that he wanted nothing more than for any remnants, any traces of sin to be extracted from him.

Notice what the writer of Hebrews 9:19-22:

For when every commandment of the law had been declared by Moses to all the people, he took the blood of calves and goats, with water and scarlet wool and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book itself and all the people, [20] saying, “This is the blood of the covenant that God commanded for you.” [21] And in the same way he sprinkled with the blood both the tent and all the vessels used in worship. [22] Indeed, under the law almost everything is purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins.

This hyssop was a small plant that could be easily used for a brush. In the Temple ceremonies, the priests used it to sprinkle blood. In Exodus 12, when the people of Israel while enslaved in Egypt were told to use this hyssop to cover the doorways with blood, so when the angel of death passed over, their firstborn would be spared. So this hyssop of which David and the writer of Hebrews speaks is an expression of God’s mercy — it was used to cleanse and purify and forgive me. Paul says, “In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins” (Ephesians 1:7). What can wash away those sins, dear friends? Nothing but the blood of Jesus, the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world.

Shouldn’t that bring us joy? When we are clean, we are joyful. When our bones are set once again. When we have a God who will hide our sins once forgiven, who will blot out our iniquities from his book, shouldn’t that bring a joy and a delight?

Now notice what David writes and prays in Psalm 51:10-12:

Create in me a clean heart, O God,
and renew a right spirit within me.
Cast me not away from your presence,
and take not your Holy Spirit from me.
Restore to me the joy of your salvation,
and uphold me with a willing spirit.

I had a pastor friend who liked to restore cars. He would take a shell of a car that had been beaten up and wrecked and to those of us who did not have his skill, it looked as if that car could never be restored. Yet he could do it — and do it well… you never would have thought that any good could have come of that.

God not only restores, he re-creates. Only God can create something out of nothing. When we are in our sin, our spirits are wrong — undeniably wrong, and in our view irreparably wrong. Yet God gives us a renewed spirit, a right(eous) spirit. Now we look at verse 11 and think, “David is asking God not to take away his salvation!” Not at all, for once we are sealed in the Spirit, we are sealed in the Spirit (Ephesians 1:13-14). What he is saying is, “I deserve it, so please don’t give me what I deserve. I do not deserve to have your Holy Spirit in me, but I’m thankful he is there to convict so that I can confess and then I can conform to your will and way.”

But again, “Restore to me the joy of your salvation.” Not, restore my salvation, restore the joy of my salvation. We wonder why we have so many joyless Christians. You may wonder, where is the joy? The question you may have to ask is, “where is the sin that robs my joy? Where do I need to be made clean?” Sadly, we are too often blinded to our sin, so we have to ask God to make us see it. We have to ask God, “Lord, make me willing to see it and deal with it and put it before you.”

Not long before she died in 1988, in a moment of surprising candor in television, Marghanita Laski, one of our best-known secular humanists and novelists, said, “What I envy most about you Christians is your forgiveness; I have nobody to forgive me.” We do! His name is Jesus Christ! He is in the forgiveness business.

3. Until we are broken before God, we cannot hope to please him (Psalm 51:13-20).

Dr. J. Wilbur Chapman told of a distinguished minister, Dr. Howard, from Australia who preached very strongly on the subject of sin. After the service, one of the church officers came to counsel with him in the study. “Dr. Howard,” he said, “we don’t want you to talk as openly as you do about man’s guilt and corruption, because if our boys and girls hear you discussing that subject they will more easily become sinners. Call it a mistake if you will, but do not speak so plainly about sin. “The minister took down a small bottle and showing it to the visitor said, “You see that label? It says strychnine — and underneath in bold, red letters the word ‘Poison!’ Do you know, man, what you are asking me to do? You are suggesting that I change the label. Suppose I do, and paste over it the words, ‘Essence of Peppermint’; don’t you see what might happen? Someone would use it, not knowing the danger involved, and would certainly die. So it is, too, with the matter of sin. The milder you make your label, the more dangerous you make your poison!”

David writes in Psalm 51:13-15

Then I will teach transgressors your ways,
and sinners will return to you.
Deliver me from bloodguiltiness, O God,
O God of my salvation,
and my tongue will sing aloud of your righteousness.
O Lord, open my lips,
and my mouth will declare your praise.

When God delivers us from our sins, our iniquities, our transgressions, the idea is that we will turn around and teach others who are in need of sin. They’ll see the work God has done in you, and “sinners will return” to the living God. When God delivers us from our sin and our self, from “bloodguiltiness,” we cannot help but “sing aloud of [God’s] righteousness.”

When Isaiah saw the Lord high and lifted up, he saw himself. He reminds me of a newspaper article in which the writer interviewed G.K. Chesterton. He asked Chesterton, “What is wrong with the world?” to which Chesterton responded, “I am.” Isaiah said:

And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. [5] And I said: “Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, the Lord of hosts!”

[6] Then one of the seraphim flew to me, having in his hand a burning coal that he had taken with tongs from the altar. [7] And he touched my mouth and said: “Behold, this has touched your lips; your guilt is taken away, and your sin atoned for.

[8] And I heard the voice of the Lord saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?” Then I said, “Here am I! Send me.”

How we declare the praises of our God and how we sing when we worship is a dogged reflection of how we view God’s mercy and deliverance. Ron should never have to ask us to sing out, nor should any other worship leader in this world! We have been delivered from our guilt. And here is the essence of our worship:

For you will not delight in sacrifice, or I would give it;
you will not be pleased with a burnt offering.
[17] The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit;
a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise
(Psalm 51:16-17, ESV).

You see, they had grown to where they worshipped the form of worship rather than seeing the function of worship was to worship the Lord God. Worship extends from brokenness. In order for us to be what He desires, he has to break us in order to remake us in his image. We can come to worship and sing and stand and pray and listen in all the right places and think, “I’ve worshipped.” Have you? We can have the right form or worship, but fail in its true function. It’s function is to exalt the lordship of Jesus Christ into all areas of life — where He is predominant.

Romans 6:1-3 says,

“What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin that grace may abound? [2] By no means! How can we who died to sin still live in it? [3] Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death?”

We have died to sin when we trust in the fact that Christ died for our sins as a sacrifice. We lay our lives on the altar as a sacrifice to him.

Conclusion

The renowned American author John Steinbeck described in his work Travels with Charley a Sunday visit to a New England church. The minister delivered a no nonsense fire and brimstone sermon (remember those?). Note Steinbeck’s reflections:

For some years now, God has been a pal to us, practicing togetherness, and that causes the same emptiness a father does playing softball with his son. But this Vermont God cared enough about me to go to a lot of trouble kicking the Hell out of me. He put my sins in a new perspective. Whereas they had been small and mean and nasty and best forgotten, this minister gave them some size and bloom and dignity. I hadn’t been thinking very well of myself for some years, but if my sins had this dimension, there was some pride left. I wasn’t a naughty child but a first-rate sinner, and I was going to catch it.[1]

After listening to David’s reaction to his sins, and after seeing how God desires to deal with the seriousness of our sin and to lift its guilt therein, how do you see your sin? Frankly, how you see your sin is a reflection of how you see your Savior! Is Christ just a good-ol’-boy in heaven wanting to simply bestow blessings like candy? Or is he more than that — wanting to deal with the primary and most devastating problem plaguing humanity which is our sin? Sin is simply unbelief — believing in the promises of the world, the flesh, and the devil rather than the promises of God through Christ.

[1]John Steinbeck, Travels with Charley: In Search of America (New York: Bantam, 1996), 78. Quoted in Haddon Robinson, Biblical Preaching: The Development and Delivery of Expository Messages, 2nd edition (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2001), 147.

The Truth about “The Secret”

In Apologetics on March 28, 2007 at 9:02 am

Albert Mohler, President of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, KY, has written a compelling article about “The Secret.” Here’s an excerpt:

We should be very concerned to live in a country in which so many citizens evidently want to be told that they, individually, are the very center of the universe. The Secret is just the latest form of American esoteric positive thinking run amok. The nation seems to endure periodic waves of positive-thinking nonsense, and every generation seems primed to believe that it can have all it wants and more. Can anyone actually believe this stuff?

Evidently so. Oprah is a big fan, as are other Hollywood and entertainment types. Byrne has attracted publicity, books sales, and attention, if nothing else. (To read the rest of the article, click here.)

This article is so helpful to me. I had one of our college students ask me about it, and I had no idea what she was talking about. Then I clicked by Oprah, and saw someone advocating it as well. Does this seem like a repackaged “Power of Positive Thinking?” What do you think?

The Truth about “The Secret”

In Apologetics on March 28, 2007 at 9:02 am

Albert Mohler, President of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, KY, has written a compelling article about “The Secret.” Here’s an excerpt:

We should be very concerned to live in a country in which so many citizens evidently want to be told that they, individually, are the very center of the universe. The Secret is just the latest form of American esoteric positive thinking run amok. The nation seems to endure periodic waves of positive-thinking nonsense, and every generation seems primed to believe that it can have all it wants and more. Can anyone actually believe this stuff?

Evidently so. Oprah is a big fan, as are other Hollywood and entertainment types. Byrne has attracted publicity, books sales, and attention, if nothing else. (To read the rest of the article, click here.)

This article is so helpful to me. I had one of our college students ask me about it, and I had no idea what she was talking about. Then I clicked by Oprah, and saw someone advocating it as well. Does this seem like a repackaged “Power of Positive Thinking?” What do you think?

John Piper is Bad — Extended Video

In Uncategorized on March 26, 2007 at 8:01 am

This has been floating around the blogosphere, but just in case you haven’t seen this, it’s priceless.

Dr. Piper will be at Southern Seminary on March 27-29, 2007.

University of Kentucky Basketball Fans: What They Demand, What They Deserve (acc’d to Joel Pett)

In Humor, Sports on March 23, 2007 at 2:36 pm

Today’s cartoon by Joel Pett, in the Lexington Herald-Leader.  His opinion about University of Kentucky fans after Tubby Smith left for the University of Minnesota:

http://media.heraldleader.com/smedia/2007/03/22/20/444-0323petttoon07.standalone.prod_affiliate.79.jpg


If you’re not a college basketball fan, my apologies.  If you are, then you just ‘get’ this. 

(HT:  Alex Marshall, Jr.)

University of Kentucky Basketball Fans: What They Demand, What They Deserve (acc’d to Joel Pett)

In Humor, Sports on March 23, 2007 at 2:36 pm

Today’s cartoon by Joel Pett, in the Lexington Herald-Leader.  His opinion about University of Kentucky fans after Tubby Smith left for the University of Minnesota:

http://media.heraldleader.com/smedia/2007/03/22/20/444-0323petttoon07.standalone.prod_affiliate.79.jpg


If you’re not a college basketball fan, my apologies.  If you are, then you just ‘get’ this. 

(HT:  Alex Marshall, Jr.)

An Amazing Time at EKU’s CRU Meeting

In Uncategorized on March 23, 2007 at 7:37 am

Last night, I had the pleasure and privilege of speaking at the Eastern Kentucky University’s Campus Crusade for Christ weekly meeting (or as they say, “I came to CRU!”).  I preached from Deuteronomy 6:4-9 on “Can I See Some I.D.?  Being an Intentional Disciple.”  I’m not good at estimating numbers of a crowd, but I would say there were close to 260 college students there.  It seemed to me that the auditorium in the William Wallace building was close to capacity.

Everyone seemed to be dialed in and we had a great time looking at God’s Word.  In the next couple of days, I’ll post my sermon notes for the CRU Kids as well as other resources I used to help me prepare.  But God was so good!

May God bless you this wonderful Friday!

An Amazing Time at EKU’s CRU Meeting

In Uncategorized on March 23, 2007 at 7:37 am

Last night, I had the pleasure and privilege of speaking at the Eastern Kentucky University’s Campus Crusade for Christ weekly meeting (or as they say, “I came to CRU!”).  I preached from Deuteronomy 6:4-9 on “Can I See Some I.D.?  Being an Intentional Disciple.”  I’m not good at estimating numbers of a crowd, but I would say there were close to 260 college students there.  It seemed to me that the auditorium in the William Wallace building was close to capacity.

Everyone seemed to be dialed in and we had a great time looking at God’s Word.  In the next couple of days, I’ll post my sermon notes for the CRU Kids as well as other resources I used to help me prepare.  But God was so good!

May God bless you this wonderful Friday!

What Value Does Life Have? Lessons From a Polar Bear Cub

In Uncategorized on March 22, 2007 at 1:53 pm

“Feeding by hand is not species-appropriate but a gross violation of animal protection laws.” These are the words of animal rights activist Frank Albrecht. Those are the reactions to a polar bear cub named Knut whose mother rejected him but is now living and being hand-fed by the Berlin Zoo. (Read the article here.)

Not species-appropriate? It’s amazing when we find ourselves clinging to certain theories and forms of what is appropriate, and forget about the lives of those affected by those forms and theories. “If a polar bear mother rejected the baby, then I believe the zoo must
follow the instincts of nature,” Albrecht said. “In the wild, it would
have been left to die.”

Yes, but the bear was not in the wild — the bear was in the zoo. Does life have more value than our theories? If not, what value does life have — and who are we to put a value on it? Who made that rule that we are the arbitors of when life ends and what is appropriate in that realm?

Life has value for those who understand we are created in the image of God (Genesis 1:26-27). We are not simply $7.42 worth of minerals and components which come together to make a homo sapien. We have souls and minds created by a life-giving God who instills the preservation of life into each one of us.

And since humans are the only ones created in God’s image, God places prime value on humans. And this is an example of what he has instilled in humans who understand this: life matters, especially the lives of the defenseless. Yet, we must not simply defend the defenseless who happen to be cute and cuddly.

powered by performancing firefox

Jamaica Beauty Queen Latest to Step Down Over Abortion Refusal (LifeNews.com)

In Culture on March 21, 2007 at 10:12 am

Kingston, Jamaica (LifeNews.com) — The reigning Miss Jamaica World 2006 is the latest beauty pageant queen to relinquish her crown after she refused to have an abortion. In January, the Miss USA pageant came under fire for forcing the winner of the New Jersey state contest to resign her crown because she’s pregnant and wouldn’t abort. Sara Lawrence, the 22 year-old woman who became the island nation’s beauty queen says she is pregnant and expecting a baby in September. She issued a statement saying she’s keeping her baby instead of her crown. “I relinquish my position as Miss Jamaica World 2006, having taken a deeply personal decision to face up to my responsibilities as one who expects to become a mother later this year,” the Jamaica Gleaner reported. “I believe that it is my moral obligation to do what I believe to be ethically correct and will follow what I believe to be right” Lawrence added. The young woman told the newspaper her boyfriend supports her decision to keep the baby and not have an abortion. Though abortion advocates frequently say otherwise, she said she would have no problem continuing to pursue a career and raising her child at the same time. Read the complete story.

Happy Birthday, J.S. Bach!

In Uncategorized on March 21, 2007 at 10:05 am

bach2003.jpgOn March 21, 322 years ago, the greatest compose the world has ever known was born. His name? Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750). Bach was born during an era which music historian label the Baroque Era in which such notable composers as Antonio Vivaldi (“The Four Seasons”), and George Frideric Handel (“The Messiah”). If you look in music history books to see how long the Baroque era lasted, to a book they say it ended in 1750. Why? Because Bach exhausted every single possibility in which this music could go. And he paved the foundation for the way music is crafted now. As you examine his manuscripts (of which he wrote 20 pieces of music per day), you will see a mathematical precision to it.

Bach’s legacy extends to his spiritual life as well. As a devout Lutheran, many of his works were for worship in the church: Mass in B Minor, St. Matthew’s Passion, Christmas Oratorio not to mention his 300+ chorales for choir.

Here are some articles about Bach that may be of interest to you:

Wikipedia article on Johan Sebastian Bach

The J.S. Bach Home Page

Dave’s J.S. Bach Page

Johann Sebastian Bach: Classical music pages article from The Grove Concise Dictionary of Music. Also links to related composers and topics, including cantatas, orchestral music, etc.

So There’s A Picnic Right After the Sermon? A Little Humor for the Day

In Church Life, Humor on March 20, 2007 at 7:43 am

I wonder if this is a depiction of a Baptist church!

cartoon_03-19-07_400×349.jpg

Copyright 1981, Rob Portlock and Christianity Today International/BuildingChurchLeaders.com. Used with permission.

So There’s A Picnic Right After the Sermon? A Little Humor for the Day

In Church Life, Humor on March 20, 2007 at 7:43 am

I wonder if this is a depiction of a Baptist church!

cartoon_03-19-07_400×349.jpg

Copyright 1981, Rob Portlock and Christianity Today International/BuildingChurchLeaders.com. Used with permission.

Grieving Over the Fourth Anniversary of the War in Iraq? Grieve Over the Loss of Life in Our Own Borders

In Culture on March 19, 2007 at 12:39 pm

On this day which marks the fourth anniversary since the war in Iraq began where we mourn those who have been lost, there is another serious loss of life taking place even within our borders. Hear Zell Miller.

How could this great land of plenty produce too few people in the last 30 years? Here is the brutal truth that no one dares to mention: We’re too few because too many of our babies have been killed. Over 45 million since Roe v. Wade in 1973. If those 45 million children had lived, today they would be defending our country, they would be filling our jobs, they would be paying into Social Security. Still, we watch as 3,700 babies are killed every single day in America. It is unbelievable that a nation under God would allow this.”

Every choice that is made has consequences. Are we willing to truly look and see what those consequences may be?

(HT: The Patriot Post. To read the entire article, click here.

powered by performancing firefox

Please pray for our Revival Services at Boone’s Creek

In Church Life on March 17, 2007 at 10:09 pm

Tonight kicked off our special revival services here at Boone’s Creek.  Each year, we kick it off with our Annual Youth Rally led by The Josh Martin Band and Dr. Mike Caudill, pastor of First Baptist Church of Hindman, KY.  Dr. Caudill will continue in leading our revival services from this Sunday the 18th through Wednesday the 21st.  If you are in the area, feel free to join us.

Also, I’d like to direct you to an article I wrote entitled “Why Revival Services Are Still a Good Thing.”  Our churches need this concentrated, extended time in the Word.  Call them conferences, call them renewal services, call them whatever… may God continue to move in his churches!

Please pray for our Revival Services at Boone’s Creek

In Church Life on March 17, 2007 at 10:09 pm

Tonight kicked off our special revival services here at Boone’s Creek.  Each year, we kick it off with our Annual Youth Rally led by The Josh Martin Band and Dr. Mike Caudill, pastor of First Baptist Church of Hindman, KY.  Dr. Caudill will continue in leading our revival services from this Sunday the 18th through Wednesday the 21st.  If you are in the area, feel free to join us.

Also, I’d like to direct you to an article I wrote entitled “Why Revival Services Are Still a Good Thing.”  Our churches need this concentrated, extended time in the Word.  Call them conferences, call them renewal services, call them whatever… may God continue to move in his churches!

When Expectations Run Amok

In Church Life, Sports on March 17, 2007 at 8:39 am

Yesterday, I wrote some reflections about an article written by Peggy Noonan dealing with whether we should put personalities above their philosophies.

As I was pondering this a bit further, I found myself at ESPN.com’s website and ran across an article by Gene Wojciechowski entitled “UK’s Smith Should Leave Before He is Eventually Fired.” UK stands for the University of Kentucky (for all you non-American, non-NCAA basketball fans.” “Smith” is Orlando “Tubby” Smith, their 10-year-coach who is on the hot seat not because of performance, mind you, but because of expectations run amok.

Here’s how his article begins:

Fire Tubby Smith?

How do you deep-six a guy who won you a national championship, who wins nearly eight of out 10 games he coaches, who gets rave reviews from his peers? How do you stick a buyout fork in a distinguished 10-year Kentucky career that has lasted longer than beloved (pre-Louisville, of course) Rick Pitino’s tenure in Lexington and includes exactly zero NCAA penalties?

You don’t. You can’t … except at Kentucky, where, said Wildcats junior guard, “people expect us to be in the Final Four every year.”

Those expectations, no longer realistic in an age of Winthrops and George Masons, is why Smith should think long and hard about a change in hoops venue. That’s right: He should think about walking away from Kentucky before Kentucky walks away from him.

This article is a study in expectations run amok from a bar set exceedingly high. The writer compares UK in basketball to Notre Dame in football — a place where there is “no margin for error.” Notice what else he writes:

It’s past is always handcuffed to its present. This is no escape from its history or its expectations.

The result is the fan base’s expectations seldom seem to be placated, even when they are winning. History has handcuffed the program!  Another excerpt:

As usual, the win didn’t satisfy everyone in blue. As Kentucky held a five-point lead with 96 seconds remaining, a fan sitting a few behind Barnhart yelled to Smith, “You are blowing this game!”

This is why Smith should bolt. Not because of some knucklehead fan, but because Barnhart might be listening to the knucklehead fan. In some cases — and you can ask former Pittsburgh Steelers coach Bill Cowher about this — it’s just time to move on. It’s nothing personal, it’s just time.

What’s the point of this article? I know many in my congregation who are a vocal part of Big Blue Nation may see me as a card-carrying Louisville Cardinal fan (no pun intended) may see me as bashing UK. Not at all. But I do see many similarities between the fan base of UK and many in our older, established churches.

  1. History handcuffs them in the present. Sadly, instead of looking at the present and the future, too many Christians live in the past and in days gone by. It’s a different age and a different way of doing business, yet the successes that we rejoiced in in the past tend to be millstones around the neck in the present.
  2. Having a great character and having that fire as a leader is not enough when the vision is off-course. Whether that is the case with Tubby or not, I do not know. But all leaders must evaluate their philosophies constantly to make sure they are heading in the right direction. For ministers, we must make sure the Word is central in all areas of life and that the Spirit of God is the one leading.
  3. Sometimes, even victories are met with a defeatist attitude. Even when people have reason to be excited, they look for reasons to worry or expect things to go wrong. The UK fan whose team was ahead by 5 told his coach that the game was being blown. In churches, even when God is moving, you have those folks who are the wet blankets who cannot rejoice in present successes because they expect problems to occur.

Can you think of any other similarities?

powered by performancing firefox

Clearing Up Dr. Mohler’s Comments About Homosexuality

In Uncategorized on March 16, 2007 at 3:57 pm

While most in the blogosphere have heard and responded to Dr. Mohler’s (perceived) comments about headlines across the nation’s papers saying, “Seminary President Says Babies Born Gay.”  Yet, many in my congregation may not have seen Dr. Mohler’s response.   In essence, he was severely misquoted.  In his article, he clears up the misperceptions as well as addresses “the controversy [that] represents both a challenge and an opportunity.”

Click here to read.

powered by performancing firefox

Clearing Up Dr. Mohler’s Comments About Homosexuality

In Uncategorized on March 16, 2007 at 3:57 pm

While most in the blogosphere have heard and responded to Dr. Mohler’s (perceived) comments about headlines across the nation’s papers saying, “Seminary President Says Babies Born Gay.”  Yet, many in my congregation may not have seen Dr. Mohler’s response.   In essence, he was severely misquoted.  In his article, he clears up the misperceptions as well as addresses “the controversy [that] represents both a challenge and an opportunity.”

Click here to read.

powered by performancing firefox

Are We Loyal to Personalities or Philosophies?

In Church Life, Politics on March 16, 2007 at 10:08 am

Peggy Noonan is one of my favorite writers. She is clear, articulate, and very insightful about the political and cultural scene. She writes every Thursday for the WSJ’s Opinion Journal — and this installment rose to the occasion. Her article is entitled “The Trouble with Loyalty: In Politics, Ideas Are More Important Than People — or At Least They Should Be.” Here’s an excerpt:

We were marking a birthday. I was seated next to a politically experienced businessman, an acquaintance of many years. He kept talking about the presidential race. I asked who he’s supporting. He was surprised I had to ask. “Hillary,” he said.

I nodded. “Tell me why,” I said.

“I’ve known her for years,” he said. “I’m a loyal person.”

I waited for him to say more. But he didn’t.

“Your reason for backing her is that you’re loyal?”

“Yes,” he said.

As if that were enough.

I was puzzled. You’re loyal. So what? You have a virtue, good. But that doesn’t mean the person you’re loyal to should be my president. That’s not enough.

And I said this, in a more polite and less concise way.

Which made him defensive. “You should talk,” he said. “You were loyal to Reagan.”

“No, I wasn’t,” I said. “I agreed with him.” I didn’t know Reagan when I went to work with him; I only knew his views and philosophy and supported them. I wanted him to succeed because I wanted what he stood for to succeed. In time I came to feel personal loyalty. But agreement came first. And if, in his presidency, Reagan had turned into some surprising, weak, tax-raising, government-growing, soft-on-Soviets guy, I would have stopped backing him. I would have thought him very nice and a bit of a dope, like Jerry Ford. I wouldn’t feel I had to hold high his memory and meaning.

Loyalty has nothing to do with it, not if you’re serious.

Or rather personal loyalty has nothing to do with it.

Don’t we see how we do this with our pastors and ministers in our churches as well? The ministers become larger than life and we find ourselves loyal to the person rather than loyal to their faithfulness to the Word of God?

What do you think of Mrs. Noonan’s article? I think she is right on the money. She makes the case that we must truly delve into the person’s worldview and philosophy rather than personality. Many heretics over church history have had very charismatic personalities — yet were pagan to the bone.

And since Mrs. Noonan brought it up, it is crucial for us to begin educating ourselves as to the candidates running for president. We know the names: Hillary, Obama, Rudy, Mitt, McCain, Newt. Some names we don’t know: Tom Tancredo, Ron Paul, Sam Brownback, Mike Huckabee, etc. We need to get past the soundbites and the personalities and find out what these men and women hold dear. What makes them tick? What do they plan to do? What is their vision for the United States of America?

We need to do this as well for our convention — we need to make sure our convention is not simply led by strong personalities (read: clerical celebrities) but by faithfulness to God’s Word and God’s mission.

What think ye?

powered by performancing firefox

Louisville Beats Stanford 78-58

In Sports on March 15, 2007 at 3:50 pm

Just wanted to rejoice over my beloved Cardinals’ first round win over Stanford.  At one point, UofL was up by 32 points.  I always get nervous when my teams play in the playoffs, but I have to say that Louisville is a quick team in transition and rebounded surprisingly well.

Next up will be the winner of the Texas A&M-Pennsylvania game, where A&M is up 47-39 with about 9 minutes left.

Dads Make a Difference — This is News? (Mohler)

In Culture on March 15, 2007 at 3:45 pm

The Press-Enterprise of Riverside, California is out with a big news flash — dads matter in the lives of their children. Sandra Stokley reports on the formation of “DADS,” a group dedicated to encouraging men to be more involved in the
lives of their children. … The fact that The Press-Enterprise saw this as a news story worthy of coverage is very revealing in itself. We should appreciate the story. At the same time, it is sobering to reflect on the health of a society in which such a development ranks as news. Here’s the scoop — dads matter. Somebody call a press conference.

(Click here to read the entirety of Dr. Mohler’s article.)

Why All the Angst Against Calvinism, Objection I: They Are Not Evangelistic

In Apologetics, Church Life, Evangelism, Theology on March 14, 2007 at 7:05 am

Among the average Southern Baptist member, the knock against Calvinism is that they are not evangelistic. Some believe that Calvinists have no place in Southern Baptist life because of the emphasis Southern Baptists put on missions and evangelism. With the IMB, the NAMB, the CP, with FAITH Evangelism Through Sunday School, the Acts 1:8 Challenge all prevailing programs within the SBC helping SBC agencies with their Great Commission call, Calvinism just doesn’t fit.

Why does Calvinism not fit, according to the average SBCer?

The first reason is a misperception of the role of God and man in salvation. What is God’s role? Does he initiate the process, or do we? If God does initiate the process, when does he do so? And if God is the sole arbitor of when salvation occurs, where does man come in — if at all?

Some who fail to look into the doctrine of God’s sovereign grace believe that “Calvinism” is a brand of fatalism. Some who are known as ‘hyper-Calvinists’ advocate the idea that God has chosen whom he will, so therefore man has no need to respond to him by faith at all — for God has already chosen him. This is not only untrue to the Scriptures, but exceedingly dangerous.

God ordains the ends of our salvation, but God’s role is also ordaining the means by which we are saved and he also grants us the faith. We know from God’s Word that “faith comes by hearing, and hearing through the Word of God” (Romans 10:17). One cannot have saving faith outside of the hearing and responding of the Word of God.

The second reason is a misperception of our ability to respond to God by our own will.

Take the first two words of Romans 10:17: “Faith comes … .” The question to ask is, where does faith come from? The average Southern Baptist says, “From my heart when I see what Jesus has done — I then have the faith to call on him.” I would agree with this — but only so far. But if you recall Romans 3:9-11:

What then? Are we Jews any better off? No, not at all. For we have already charged that all, both Jews and Greeks, are under the power of sin, [10] as it is written:

“None is righteous, no, not one;
[11] no one understands;
no one seeks for God.

None on earth are righteous. In other words, we do not have a right standing before the Creator and Judge of all things — and we have to rely on a righteousness that he gives to us (Romans 3:21). No one understands the things of God either, so God has to give us that understanding to help us understand the deep things of God (1 Corinthians 2:9-15). No one even seeks after God, for “all we like sheep have gone astray, each of us turning to his own way, and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all” (Isaiah 53:6).

Not righteous before God.

No understanding of godly things.

No one even seeks after him.

With this, how do we have any hope of being saved? The grace of God.

Ephes. 2:8-10 tells us:

For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, [9] not a result of works, so that no one may boast. [10] For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.

I use this verse and all the preceeding ones because these are verses with which we as Southern Baptists grew up in Sunday School and Vacation Bible School. And I suppose I am also saying that a right and full understanding of these verses would show that not too many SBCers are that far away — and may already be closet “Calvinists.”

“It is not of your own doing, it is the gift of God,” Paul says. What is the ‘it’ that is the gift? Salvation? Yes — but how. By grace? Yes — and why is this grace applied? Faith. Yet, if we cannot seek God on our own, cannot obtain our own righteousness, cannot even understand the things of God, how shall we have faith? Not of yourselves, but this salvation by grace through faith is the ‘it’ which is God’s gift to us.

You may say, “Salvation. Grace. Faith. That’s three things, not one.” I say it is one accomplishment of salvation — the other is just the means by which this salvation occurs.

So How Does an Average SBCer Reconcile Calvinism with Evangelism?

Simple. The pressure is off of us. We are called to “go and make disciples” (that’s still in the Bible — Matthew 28:18). We are called to “be his witnesses” (Acts 1:8). We are called to preach the Good News and call people to repentance to Christ (Mark 1:14-15; Romans 10:13-15).

For the “Calvinist,” those commands are still in place, with one notable exception in perspective: I know that someone getting into heaven is not squarely on my shoulders but on the one who calls. We already know that we are to plant and water, but God causes the growth, yes (1 Corinthians 3:8, ESV)? We already no that “no one comes to [Jesus] unless the Father who sent [Him] draws them” (John 6:44). We already know that “all that the Father has given [Christ] will come to Him, and whoever believes in [Christ, He] will in no ways cast out” (John 6:37).

We are in the telling and persuading and disciple-making business, which God empowers us to do (Acts 1:8a). But we are not in the soul-saving business — that is entirely of God.

So we go and tell and witness and persuade and beg and plead — knowing that God is moving in someone’s heart someone — but we do not know whose. So we tell everyone we can about Christ and trust the Holy Spirit will move where he chooses (John 3:7-8).

——-

Previous posts on “Why All the Angst Against Calvinism?”

The Necessity of Prayer (John Calvin)

In Devotional on March 12, 2007 at 3:25 pm

From John Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book III. John T. McNeill, Ed. p. 858.)

It is, therefore, by the benefit of prayer that we reach those riches which are laid up for us with the Heavenly Father. For there is a communion of men with God by which, having entered the heavenly sanctuary, they appeal to him in person concerning this promises in order to experience, where necessity so demands, that what they believed was not in vain, although he had promised it in word alone. Therefore we see that to us nothing is promised to be expected from the Lord, which we are not also bidden to ask of him in prayers. So true is it that we dig up by prayer the treasures that were pointed out by the Lord’s gospel, and which our faith has gazed upon.

Words fail to explain how necessary prayer is, and in how many ways the exercise of prayer is profitable. Surely, with good reason the Heavenly Father affirms that the only stronghold of safety is in calling upon his name [cf. Joel 2:32]. By so doing we invoke the presence both of his providence, through which he watches over and guards our affairs, and of his power, through which he sustains us, weak as we are and well-nigh overcome, and of his goodness, through which he receives us, miserably burdened with sins, unto grace; and in short, it is by prayer that we call him to reveal himself as wholly present to us. Hence comes an extraordinary peace and repose to our consciences. For having disclosed to the Lord the necessity that was pressing upon us, we even rest fully in the thought that none of our ills is hid from him who, we are convinced, has both the will and the power to take the best care of us.

The Field of 65 is Set — Let March Madness Begin

In Sports on March 12, 2007 at 8:15 am

The NCAA Tournament selection committee has selected the field of 65 (click here for the tournament bracket).

In our little slice of America, we pay attention to the University of Kentucky and the University of Louisville.  Kentucky drew a No. 8 seed in the West bracket, having to play Villanova (22-10) then likely No. 1 seed Kansas.

Louisville is the No. 6 seed in the South bracket and will play No. 11 seed Stanford, then (if they win) they play the winner of No. 3 Texas A&M and No. 14 Pennsylvania.

On a personal level, although my allegiance as far as college athletics is concerned is to the University of Louisville, I grew up a fan of the Florida Gators.  They are the No. 1 over all seed.

What do you think?  Who will go to the Final Four and who will win the national championship?  Here are my picks.

St. Louis bracket:  Florida
San Jose bracket:  UCLA
East Rutherford bracket:  Georgetown
San Antonio:  Ohio State

Thoughts?

What Vast Responsibility!

In Preaching on March 10, 2007 at 11:06 am

In his book on Biblical Preaching, Haddon Robinson includes a quote from Matthew Simpson that all of us who teach and preach the Word of God would do well to heed:

His throne is the pulpit; he stands in Christ’s stead; his message is the Word of God; around him are immortal souls; the Savior, unseen, is beside him; the Holy Spirit broods over the congregation; angels gaze upon the scene, and heaven and hell await the issue. What associations, and what vast responsibility!” (Lectures on Preaching, New York: Phillips & Hunt, 1879, p. 166).

Having served at Boone’s Creek Baptist Church for 3 1/2 years, I am just now beginning to understand the vast responsibility I have in being not only their pastor but also their preacher of the Word of God. I hear of people who, after having a particular issue come up in their life, say that the Word of God addresses that issue clearly and completely. “It was as if you were speaking directly to me!” Well, I wasn’t, but God was through me.

Is there any way to plan something like this? No way! Is there any way God sovereignly know about this? Absolutely! And so my responsibility is to first know God through His Word, and thus He will help us know our people through the fellowship of the Holy Spirit — “the tie that binds!” The terror and the triumph of pulpit ministry — what an amazing God who calls us in Christ!

Continuous Media “Snacking” — Bite Size Entertainment for an Attention-Deficit Age (Mohler)

In Culture on March 8, 2007 at 4:10 pm

Just a few decades ago, educators and other observers were warning that the American attention span was growing dangerously short. Educators reported that students had difficulty maintaining focus on a subject — even for just a few minutes. Well, it now looks like those minutes may be turning into seconds. In this morning’s blog, Dr. Albert Mohler says the attention deficit spells further challenge for educators, parents and preachers.

(Read the details in Dr. Mohler’s blog

).

Continuous Media “Snacking” — Bite Size Entertainment for an Attention-Deficit Age (Mohler)

In Culture on March 8, 2007 at 4:10 pm

Just a few decades ago, educators and other observers were warning that the American attention span was growing dangerously short. Educators reported that students had difficulty maintaining focus on a subject — even for just a few minutes. Well, it now looks like those minutes may be turning into seconds. In this morning’s blog, Dr. Albert Mohler says the attention deficit spells further challenge for educators, parents and preachers.

(Read the details in Dr. Mohler’s blog

).

You’re An Expository Preacher?!? Ohh! Part V: The Unity of the Testaments

In For Preachers/Pastors, For Seminary Students, Preaching on March 7, 2007 at 8:33 am

A speaker at the Southern Seminary chapel told a story of a young preacher who first came to his church. One Sunday night, he preached on the Old Testament. After the service, a man came up to him afterwards and lit into the young preacher — almost to the point of coming to blows. The reason? We as a people of God do not need the Old Testament anymore. It is entirely irrelevant — for we are a New Testament people under a different covenant. We do not come to God by works of the law, but by grace. The Old Testament is all about law, the New Testament all about grace. Are they right?

Contrast this mindset with another who says, “Yes, we have the New Testament, but God’s Law is still His Law — so the Old Testament laws still apply to us today.” As a result, we still have people who say certain foods are clean and unclean, who say we still must worship on the Sabbath (meaning, Saturday), that tattoos are immoral and the list goes on.

It is my conviction that these two mindsets are too extreme. Yet where are we to go? What role does the Old Testament play in the New? As an expository preacher, you understand Paul’s desire and his mandate to preach “the whole counsel of God” (Acts 20:27). In fact, one must remember that Paul expounded the Gospel not from the New Testament — for it was still be compiled by the Holy Spirit. Paul preached — as did the early church — from the Old Testament.

I believe that the Bible is not made up of two stories but of one. God has progressively unfolded his redemptive plan to bring him glory and honor among the nations. Romans 11:33-36

Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways!

[34] “For who has known the mind of the Lord,
or who has been his counselor?”
[35] “Or who has given a gift to him
that he might be repaid?”
[36] For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen.

In the next segment (whenever that will be), we will talk about how the unity of Testaments is spoken of in the Scriptures.

Preach the Word (or in the words of one of our college students, Cameron Potts, “BRING IT!”)

Previous posts from this Series:

Introduction

Part I: Take the Text on Its Own Terms

II: You Deal With Topics You’d Otherwise Avoid

III: You Bypass “Felt Needs” and Address “Real Needs”

IV: You Take the Scriptures as a Whole Rather Than as Fodder for Prooftexts

You’re An Expository Preacher?!? Ohh! Part V: The Unity of the Testaments

In For Preachers/Pastors, For Seminary Students, Preaching on March 7, 2007 at 8:33 am

A speaker at the Southern Seminary chapel told a story of a young preacher who first came to his church. One Sunday night, he preached on the Old Testament. After the service, a man came up to him afterwards and lit into the young preacher — almost to the point of coming to blows. The reason? We as a people of God do not need the Old Testament anymore. It is entirely irrelevant — for we are a New Testament people under a different covenant. We do not come to God by works of the law, but by grace. The Old Testament is all about law, the New Testament all about grace. Are they right?

Contrast this mindset with another who says, “Yes, we have the New Testament, but God’s Law is still His Law — so the Old Testament laws still apply to us today.” As a result, we still have people who say certain foods are clean and unclean, who say we still must worship on the Sabbath (meaning, Saturday), that tattoos are immoral and the list goes on.

It is my conviction that these two mindsets are too extreme. Yet where are we to go? What role does the Old Testament play in the New? As an expository preacher, you understand Paul’s desire and his mandate to preach “the whole counsel of God” (Acts 20:27). In fact, one must remember that Paul expounded the Gospel not from the New Testament — for it was still be compiled by the Holy Spirit. Paul preached — as did the early church — from the Old Testament.

I believe that the Bible is not made up of two stories but of one. God has progressively unfolded his redemptive plan to bring him glory and honor among the nations. Romans 11:33-36

Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways!

[34] “For who has known the mind of the Lord,
or who has been his counselor?”
[35] “Or who has given a gift to him
that he might be repaid?”
[36] For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen.

In the next segment (whenever that will be), we will talk about how the unity of Testaments is spoken of in the Scriptures.

Preach the Word (or in the words of one of our college students, Cameron Potts, “BRING IT!”)

Previous posts from this Series:

Introduction

Part I: Take the Text on Its Own Terms

II: You Deal With Topics You’d Otherwise Avoid

III: You Bypass “Felt Needs” and Address “Real Needs”

IV: You Take the Scriptures as a Whole Rather Than as Fodder for Prooftexts

How Not to Lose Your Faith in College (Thabiti Anyabwile)

In Uncategorized on March 6, 2007 at 11:25 am

Thabati Anyabwile wrote an excellent article a number of years ago for Boundless Magazine about How Not to Lose Your Faith in College.  It’s well worth the read.

(HT: Cameron Potts)

Have They Found Jesus’ Family Tomb: The Fluff Behind the Stuff

In Apologetics, Theology on March 5, 2007 at 11:23 pm

Major Bowes was a popular radio host of the Original Amateur Hour in the 1930s — a show which predated and even inspired other shows such as Star Search of the 1980s and Americal Idol of today. He had an expression which he used to open up every show by spinning a wheel to determine the order of the performers. As he spun the wheel, he noted, “’Round and ‘round she goes, where she stops, nobody knows.”

As I heard this past Sunday and Monday about the latest news which calls into question the person and character of Jesus Christ, that saying came into my head again. “Where she stops, nobody knows.” First, the DaVinci Code’s conspiracy theory on how the Church was hiding the truth about Jesus and his supposed offspring. Then came along The Gospel of Judas, a poor example of Christian ‘literature’ which contained fourteen pages with large pieces missing, and the pieces which remained portrayed Judas as the hero of the story because he gave Jesus over to death, thus setting him free from this evil body into the more holy spirit world. Though this rang of Gnosticism which by default says that all things earthly are evil and all things spiritual are good (and thus sang a different tune to the biblical Gospels), many people believed it because it cast doubt not only on the reliability of the Scriptures but also cast doubt as to whether they needed to be accountable to the Scriptures as well.

Now comes the latest of these Titanic tales! The Discovery Channel will show a documentary entitled The Lost Tomb of Jesus telling the story of ten stone coffins called ossuaries found in a 2,000-year-old tomb in Jerusalem by Israeli builders. This, coupled with Simcha Jacobovici and Charles Pelligrino’s book The Jesus Family Tomb: The Discovery, the Investigation, and the Evidence That Could Change History (HarperCollins).

Though they do not seek to undermine the resurrection (there were no bones found). What they seek to do is propound the notion set forth in The DaVinci Code and The Jesus Dynasty that Jesus was married and had offspring. They claim these ossuaries have inscriptions of names on the side which show conclusively of Jesus’ family. One ossuary has the inscription, “Jesus son of Joseph,” while another immediately beside it reads, “Mariamene e Mara.” They have concluded that this is Jesus’ wife named Mary and that he had a son named “Judah” because they feel the odds of each of these New Testament names being together in one tomb are astronomical. They believe they have run the appropriate tests and that the evidence is conclusive. I disagree and here’s why.

Who is Behind This?

When conducting research of this nature, one has to ask the question, “Who is involved in the actual research itself?”

James Cameron. Earlier, I used the word ‘Titanic’ and for a reason. James Cameron is a top-flight movie director who has directed such movies as Terminator and Titanic. Much of the ‘facts’ that Cameron promoted in Titanic were called into question, and he seems to be using his poor researching skills to promote this particular story as well.

James Tabor. Author of The Jesus Dynasty: The Hidden History of Jesus, His Royal Family, and the Birth of Christianity (2006) in which he promoted the idea of a Roman soldier named Panthera being the father of Jesus and had much to say about this particular tomb. Yet Ben Witherington of Asbury Seminary makes a great point about his involvement:

In that book, he had quite a good deal to say about the Talpiot Tomb, and about Panthera being the father to Jesus, and about Jesus being buried in Galilee, and of course nothing about an ossuary which claims that Joseph is the father of Jesus. Why such a quick reversal of his earlier opinions? This makes him very [pliable], not a very reliable witness who sticks by his guns when he draws a conclusion, for he has now reversed himself not just on one or two minor points, but on several major ones.

Statisticians. I took a class on statistics and found out quickly that the conclusions you make are solely based upon the data you have. What must be realized (thank you again, Dr. Witherington) is that Jesus was never called “son of Joseph” by his followers but only by outsiders who did so by mistake. Plus, would you like to guess the most popular names among Palestinian Jews? Simon is first, then Joseph. The name of Jesus is sixth. As for women, 21% of them were called Mary. With such popular names, it will be a stretch to go from their hypothesis (what they seek to prove) to their desired conclusions.

DNA Experts. In our CSI world, we take our steps of getting DNA and trying to discern from that portion of evidence from the bone fragments (remember, no bones are in these boxes). Many CSI experts will tell you that trying to come up with something quite conclusive from bone shards 2,000 years ago will be next-to-impossible work.

Any Critics Yet?

It took all of about fifteen seconds for the critics to come out — and not from Christians. Now there are an inordinate amount of critics (here) who are distancing themselves and quickly from this project.

In 1996 when the BBC aired a documentary on the exact same subject, archaeologists challenged the claims. Amos Kloner, the first archaeologist to examine the site, said the idea fails to hold up by archaeological standards but makes for profitable television. He rightly notes,

Jesus and his relatives were a Galilee family with no ties in Jerusalem. The Talpiot tomb belonged to a middle-class family from the first century.

Steven Pfann, a biblical scholar at the University of the Holy Land in Jerusalem, said, “I don’t think that Christians are going to buy into this. But skeptics, in general, would like to see something that pokes holes into the story that so many people hold dear” (AP, February 26, 2007).


Should We Let This Shake Our Faith

No.

OK, OK — I’ll go into more detail.

First, why would anyone follow as a Savior a man from a small country who had a middle-class family? Jesus was one for whom each of his followers died — and this after they thought he was dead and the dream of a Kingdom of God being on earth had vanished. Enough people saw him crucified and over 500 people saw him resurrected (1 Corinthians 15:6). Even doubting Thomas, the last of the disciples to be convinced, saw Christ and said, “My Lord, and my God” (John 20:29)!

Secondly, there will always be critics out there who seek to crack the very foundation on which our faith lies — the nature of Christ. If James Tabor is right that Jesus had an earthly father, and Dan Brown and James Cameron were right that Jesus took a wife and had children, then Jesus would be a man — and only a man. Yet, if Jesus is God, the implications are far reaching — they have to listen to what He says, and will be accountable to Him since He is God!

One pastor said that the Bible is an anvil with little hammers broken all around it. This is the case here as well. I write this simply as an introductory paper for all of us to read, then explore some more. You will not find your faith weakened, but strengthed!

For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. [19] For it is written,

“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise,
and the discernment of the discerning I will thwart.”
[20] Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? [21] For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not know God through wisdom, it pleased God through the folly of what we preach to save those who believe. [22] For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, [23] but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, [24] but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. [25] For the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men (1 Cor. 1:18-25, ESV).

Have They Found Jesus’ Family Tomb: The Fluff Behind the Stuff

In Apologetics, Theology on March 5, 2007 at 11:23 pm

Major Bowes was a popular radio host of the Original Amateur Hour in the 1930s — a show which predated and even inspired other shows such as Star Search of the 1980s and Americal Idol of today. He had an expression which he used to open up every show by spinning a wheel to determine the order of the performers. As he spun the wheel, he noted, “’Round and ‘round she goes, where she stops, nobody knows.”

As I heard this past Sunday and Monday about the latest news which calls into question the person and character of Jesus Christ, that saying came into my head again. “Where she stops, nobody knows.” First, the DaVinci Code’s conspiracy theory on how the Church was hiding the truth about Jesus and his supposed offspring. Then came along The Gospel of Judas, a poor example of Christian ‘literature’ which contained fourteen pages with large pieces missing, and the pieces which remained portrayed Judas as the hero of the story because he gave Jesus over to death, thus setting him free from this evil body into the more holy spirit world. Though this rang of Gnosticism which by default says that all things earthly are evil and all things spiritual are good (and thus sang a different tune to the biblical Gospels), many people believed it because it cast doubt not only on the reliability of the Scriptures but also cast doubt as to whether they needed to be accountable to the Scriptures as well.

Now comes the latest of these Titanic tales! The Discovery Channel will show a documentary entitled The Lost Tomb of Jesus telling the story of ten stone coffins called ossuaries found in a 2,000-year-old tomb in Jerusalem by Israeli builders. This, coupled with Simcha Jacobovici and Charles Pelligrino’s book The Jesus Family Tomb: The Discovery, the Investigation, and the Evidence That Could Change History (HarperCollins).

Though they do not seek to undermine the resurrection (there were no bones found). What they seek to do is propound the notion set forth in The DaVinci Code and The Jesus Dynasty that Jesus was married and had offspring. They claim these ossuaries have inscriptions of names on the side which show conclusively of Jesus’ family. One ossuary has the inscription, “Jesus son of Joseph,” while another immediately beside it reads, “Mariamene e Mara.” They have concluded that this is Jesus’ wife named Mary and that he had a son named “Judah” because they feel the odds of each of these New Testament names being together in one tomb are astronomical. They believe they have run the appropriate tests and that the evidence is conclusive. I disagree and here’s why.

Who is Behind This?

When conducting research of this nature, one has to ask the question, “Who is involved in the actual research itself?”

James Cameron. Earlier, I used the word ‘Titanic’ and for a reason. James Cameron is a top-flight movie director who has directed such movies as Terminator and Titanic. Much of the ‘facts’ that Cameron promoted in Titanic were called into question, and he seems to be using his poor researching skills to promote this particular story as well.

James Tabor. Author of The Jesus Dynasty: The Hidden History of Jesus, His Royal Family, and the Birth of Christianity (2006) in which he promoted the idea of a Roman soldier named Panthera being the father of Jesus and had much to say about this particular tomb. Yet Ben Witherington of Asbury Seminary makes a great point about his involvement:

In that book, he had quite a good deal to say about the Talpiot Tomb, and about Panthera being the father to Jesus, and about Jesus being buried in Galilee, and of course nothing about an ossuary which claims that Joseph is the father of Jesus. Why such a quick reversal of his earlier opinions? This makes him very [pliable], not a very reliable witness who sticks by his guns when he draws a conclusion, for he has now reversed himself not just on one or two minor points, but on several major ones.

Statisticians. I took a class on statistics and found out quickly that the conclusions you make are solely based upon the data you have. What must be realized (thank you again, Dr. Witherington) is that Jesus was never called “son of Joseph” by his followers but only by outsiders who did so by mistake. Plus, would you like to guess the most popular names among Palestinian Jews? Simon is first, then Joseph. The name of Jesus is sixth. As for women, 21% of them were called Mary. With such popular names, it will be a stretch to go from their hypothesis (what they seek to prove) to their desired conclusions.

DNA Experts. In our CSI world, we take our steps of getting DNA and trying to discern from that portion of evidence from the bone fragments (remember, no bones are in these boxes). Many CSI experts will tell you that trying to come up with something quite conclusive from bone shards 2,000 years ago will be next-to-impossible work.

Any Critics Yet?

It took all of about fifteen seconds for the critics to come out — and not from Christians. Now there are an inordinate amount of critics (here) who are distancing themselves and quickly from this project.

In 1996 when the BBC aired a documentary on the exact same subject, archaeologists challenged the claims. Amos Kloner, the first archaeologist to examine the site, said the idea fails to hold up by archaeological standards but makes for profitable television. He rightly notes,

Jesus and his relatives were a Galilee family with no ties in Jerusalem. The Talpiot tomb belonged to a middle-class family from the first century.

Steven Pfann, a biblical scholar at the University of the Holy Land in Jerusalem, said, “I don’t think that Christians are going to buy into this. But skeptics, in general, would like to see something that pokes holes into the story that so many people hold dear” (AP, February 26, 2007).


Should We Let This Shake Our Faith

No.

OK, OK — I’ll go into more detail.

First, why would anyone follow as a Savior a man from a small country who had a middle-class family? Jesus was one for whom each of his followers died — and this after they thought he was dead and the dream of a Kingdom of God being on earth had vanished. Enough people saw him crucified and over 500 people saw him resurrected (1 Corinthians 15:6). Even doubting Thomas, the last of the disciples to be convinced, saw Christ and said, “My Lord, and my God” (John 20:29)!

Secondly, there will always be critics out there who seek to crack the very foundation on which our faith lies — the nature of Christ. If James Tabor is right that Jesus had an earthly father, and Dan Brown and James Cameron were right that Jesus took a wife and had children, then Jesus would be a man — and only a man. Yet, if Jesus is God, the implications are far reaching — they have to listen to what He says, and will be accountable to Him since He is God!

One pastor said that the Bible is an anvil with little hammers broken all around it. This is the case here as well. I write this simply as an introductory paper for all of us to read, then explore some more. You will not find your faith weakened, but strengthed!

For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. [19] For it is written,

“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise,
and the discernment of the discerning I will thwart.”
[20] Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? [21] For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not know God through wisdom, it pleased God through the folly of what we preach to save those who believe. [22] For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, [23] but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, [24] but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. [25] For the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men (1 Cor. 1:18-25, ESV).

“Politicians and Christian Statesmen?” (www.ReedHeustis.com)

In Culture, Politics on March 5, 2007 at 7:17 pm

rrhpic.jpgI am so thankful for Christian constitutionalists such as Reed Heustis who provide a clear Christian voice in helping us discern many matters of politics. He has written a good article entitled “Politicians and Christian Statesmen?” (click here to read). Here is an excerpt:

In the realm of politics, bad apples seem to be everywhere, which is why a distinction must be made between statesmen and mere politicians. While both definitions may be synonymous in that a statesman is “one versed in the principles or art of government,” and a politician is “a person experienced in the art or science of government;” a statesman ultimately elevates principle above personal and political gain.

Click here to read the rest of this article.

“Politicians and Christian Statesmen?” (www.ReedHeustis.com)

In Culture, Politics on March 5, 2007 at 7:17 pm

rrhpic.jpgI am so thankful for Christian constitutionalists such as Reed Heustis who provide a clear Christian voice in helping us discern many matters of politics. He has written a good article entitled “Politicians and Christian Statesmen?” (click here to read). Here is an excerpt:

In the realm of politics, bad apples seem to be everywhere, which is why a distinction must be made between statesmen and mere politicians. While both definitions may be synonymous in that a statesman is “one versed in the principles or art of government,” and a politician is “a person experienced in the art or science of government;” a statesman ultimately elevates principle above personal and political gain.

Click here to read the rest of this article.

I Can’t Wait for Sundays

In Church Life on March 3, 2007 at 11:14 pm

No really — I can’t wait for Sundays to roll around. As a pastor, most everything that occurs during the week comes to a fine point on Sunday morning. As I consider Acts 6:4 where the disciples gave themselves primarily over to “prayer and the ministry of the Word,” I find that my main ministry is that of connecting with God in prayer and ministering the Word of God through preaching and teaching — everything else stems off these two ministries.

What is it about Sundays that excites me so?

(1) I get to see my church family. Though I have only been here at Boone’s Creek for 3 1/2 years, I have noticed various transitions. I started out as “the new guy” with everyone anticipating in the first year but staying at arms length, to becoming “the preacher” to now becoming their “pastor.” I am now being seen as one of the family. This takes time, trust, and lots of love in Christ.

(2) I get to preach God’s Word to God’s people. What a privilege! What a calling!  To be able to open up His Word and know that this is His revelation to the world in general and to His people specifically is a thought I can scarcely contemplate.  And to know that the Holy Spirit will take that Word and apply it to hearts and will make sure it accomplishes all that it desires to accomplish — goodness!

(3)  I get to hear stories of what God is doing in hearts and minds of his people.  One person receives Christ, another person grasps a truth God reveals, another shares their faith, another asks questions trying to understand how God lives and moves and has his being … and the list goes on.   That is exciting!

(4)  I get to pray with my people.  We get to connect with God together, linking arms and advancing his kingdom during this spiritual warfare.  Praying for those who are lost, who are sick, in the military, our government officials, our church staff and deacons, our college students, our outreach ministries, our churches with whom we are partnering, and on top of that praising God for who he is and what he has done!

These are just four of many.  What other things make you look forward to being with your brothers and sisters on for Sunday morning worship?

I Can’t Wait for Sundays

In Church Life on March 3, 2007 at 11:14 pm

No really — I can’t wait for Sundays to roll around. As a pastor, most everything that occurs during the week comes to a fine point on Sunday morning. As I consider Acts 6:4 where the disciples gave themselves primarily over to “prayer and the ministry of the Word,” I find that my main ministry is that of connecting with God in prayer and ministering the Word of God through preaching and teaching — everything else stems off these two ministries.

What is it about Sundays that excites me so?

(1) I get to see my church family. Though I have only been here at Boone’s Creek for 3 1/2 years, I have noticed various transitions. I started out as “the new guy” with everyone anticipating in the first year but staying at arms length, to becoming “the preacher” to now becoming their “pastor.” I am now being seen as one of the family. This takes time, trust, and lots of love in Christ.

(2) I get to preach God’s Word to God’s people. What a privilege! What a calling!  To be able to open up His Word and know that this is His revelation to the world in general and to His people specifically is a thought I can scarcely contemplate.  And to know that the Holy Spirit will take that Word and apply it to hearts and will make sure it accomplishes all that it desires to accomplish — goodness!

(3)  I get to hear stories of what God is doing in hearts and minds of his people.  One person receives Christ, another person grasps a truth God reveals, another shares their faith, another asks questions trying to understand how God lives and moves and has his being … and the list goes on.   That is exciting!

(4)  I get to pray with my people.  We get to connect with God together, linking arms and advancing his kingdom during this spiritual warfare.  Praying for those who are lost, who are sick, in the military, our government officials, our church staff and deacons, our college students, our outreach ministries, our churches with whom we are partnering, and on top of that praising God for who he is and what he has done!

These are just four of many.  What other things make you look forward to being with your brothers and sisters on for Sunday morning worship?

Grunge Christianity? MacArthur Speaks on Driscoll-esque Preaching

In Church Life, For Preachers/Pastors, For Seminary Students, Leadership, Preaching on March 3, 2007 at 7:46 am

I confess, I am a Mark Driscoll fan — to a point.  I concur with John MacArthur about Driscoll:

“He is a very effective communicator—a bright, witty, clever, funny, insightful, crude, profane, deliberately shocking, in-your-face kind of guy. His soteriology is exactly right, but that only makes his infatuation with the vulgar aspects of contemporary society more disturbing.”

Driscoll pastors the Mars Hill Church in Seattle.  I have benefited greatly from Driscoll’s sermons on Jesus, the atonement — and really everything he has preached.  Yet, he preaches in Seattle in a basically left-wing “grunge” community where his speaking style really chimes with the people.  I wrote about him previously (here) and mentioned he is someone that I wish I could recommend to my people here at Boone’s Creek, but just can’t because of his maverick-style delivery.

MacArthur has an excellent word for all young aspiring preachers. Click here to read .

A Letter to Non-Attending Members

In Church Life on March 2, 2007 at 10:44 am

A friend of mine sent me a link of a letter written by a pastor to his non-attending members. I was touched by the pastoral nature of this letter, while at the same time moved by the conviction he had over church membership and its seriousness therein. I urge all of you to read this letter, especially those of you from Boone’s Creek Baptist where I pastor. I would like your comments on this.

Click here to read.

(HT: Baptist Blogger and Mark Combs)