Matthew R. Perry

Archive for May, 2007

Why Does God Wish to Guard Our Hearts?

In Devotional on May 30, 2007 at 8:59 pm

Why does God wish us to guard our hearts (Proverbs 4:23)? 

Why does God oftentimes refer to himself as our fortress (Psalm 46:1)? 

Why does God hem us in (Psalm 139:5)?

Why does Paul tell us not to be anxious but to make our requests known to God for the peace which guards our hearts (Philippians 4:6-7)? 

Why does Paul tell Timothy to watch your life and ministry (1 Timothy 4:16)?

I think that most believe it is to keep the outside enemy out — but I believe he calls us to make sure we stay in-bounds to His will?

We’ve been going through the book of Nehemiah — and as I’ve been studying it, I wonder how much of building that wall was to keep the enemies such as Sanballat, Tobiah, the Arabs, the armies of Samaria, and Gesham out — or did he want the walls up to help re-establish the covenant culture and ‘hem in’ God’s people. 

When we look back at Philippians 4:7 in how God guards our hearts and minds with the peace of Christ, he does so with the understanding that our anxiety takes us out-of-bounds.  Trust readily stays on the path of righteousness that God lays out for us.  Worry believes that peace can be found off God’s path.  Worry believes that God’s path is keeping us away from the true solution to our respective issues.  Trust says, “I don’t see the end in sight, but lead me on for Your name’s sake.”

Powered by ScribeFire.

My Summer Reading List

In Uncategorized on May 27, 2007 at 1:59 pm

Conservatism: Ghost of Liberalism Past (Reed Heustis)

In Culture, Politics on May 26, 2007 at 7:43 pm

rrhpic.jpgUniversity political science classes indoctrinate millions of students every year with the Liberal-versus-Conservative myth that gets perpetuated in establishment American politics at all levels of government. Supposedly, on the “Left” is the ideology of Liberalism, and on the “Right” is Conservatism. All political struggles, the Poli Sci professor instructs, take place upon this continuum.

Although there exist other theories of government, most people subscribe to the above concept. People on the “Right”
smear their liberal counterparts as “liberal lunatics” or “leftist radicals,” whereas those on the “Left” demonize their conservative opponents as “right-wing bigots” or “fascist extremists.”

In a way, both “wings” have a love-hate relationship with one another. Without conservatives to bash, liberals would
have to come up with some other form of ideology. The same goes for conservatives, but even more so. Where would Rush Limbaugh be but for the rants of contemporary liberals?

Ironically though, Conservatism is nothing but the Ghost of Liberalism Past. If anything, Liberalism is master, Conservatism servant. Wherever Liberalism travels, Conservatism follows.

(Click here to read the rest of this really good article.)

© AD 2007 Christian Constitutionalist, accessible on the web at
www.ChristianConstitutionalist.com
. All Rights
Reserved.

Powered by ScribeFire.

My Favorite Preachers

In Uncategorized on May 25, 2007 at 1:19 pm

So here in the next installment of my personal favorites are those who are faithful preachers of the Gospel.  Here are my top ten:

  1. Arturo Azurdia, III: Arturo Azurdia is the author of the excellent book ‘Spirit Empowered Preaching‘ published by Mentor. He is Associate Professor of Pastoral Theology and the Director of Pastoral Mentoring at Western Seminary in Portland Oregon.
  2. Tim Keller:  Senior Pastor, Redeemer Presbyterian Church, New York (for a great collection of Keller’s resources, click here);
  3. John Piper, Pastor for Preaching and Vision, Bethlehem Baptist Church, Minneapolis, MN; Founder, Desiring God Ministries
  4. John MacArthur (especially from the 1980s and 1990s), Senior Pastor, Grace Community Church, Sun Valley, CA; Founder, Grace To You
  5. J. Vernon McGee (1904-1988), longtime leader of Thru the Bible Ministries
  6. D.A. Carson, professor of New Testament at the New Evangelical Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (go to ChristWay Media for some good Carson resources as well as Faith By Hearing)
  7. Stephen Olford (1918-2004):  Founder of Olford Ministries International which helps ministers engage in expositional preaching.  He wrote a book which changed me called Anointed Expository Preaching.
  8. Don Whitney, Associate Professor of Biblical Spirituality at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Louisville, KY
  9. J. Ligon Duncan, III:  Senior Pastor, First Presbyterian Church, Jackson, Mississippi
  10. Martyn Lloyd-Jones (1899-1981) — considered by many to be the greatest preacher of the 20th century. Click on his name to go to the Martyn Lloyd-Jones Trust and you can actually hear his sermons!

Some preachers whom you have never heard of, but should:

  1. Mark Combs, Pastor, Salem Baptist Church, Salem, KY
  2. Kevin Whitt, Pastor, Harvest Community Church, Eminence, KY
  3. Scott Davis, Pastor, Pitts Baptist Church, Concord, NC
  4. Steve Weaver, Pastor, West Broadway Baptist Church in Lenoir City, TN since April of 2000
  5. Ben Skaug, Pastor, Conway Baptist Church, Colorado
  6. Greg Heisler, Assistant Professor of Preaching and Speech, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, Wake Forest, NC; author, Spirit-Led Preaching (B&H, 2007)

And for your amusement:

Powered by ScribeFire.

My Favorite Blogs

In Uncategorized on May 23, 2007 at 9:57 pm

My Favorite Podcasts

In Uncategorized on May 23, 2007 at 7:05 pm

Podcasts are an amazing resource. Once you subscribe to them on iTunes, they are automatically downloaded to iTunes upon release. Here are my favorite podcasts:

  • Boone’s CreeKast: the morning sermons of Boone’s Creek Baptist Church, Lexington, KY (the church where I pastor — had to put it in … kiddingly, of course) — anyway, onward!
  • Desiring God Podcast with John Piper
  • Capitol Hill Baptist Church Podcast: the church where Dr. Mark Dever (9 Marks) is pastor;
  • The American View: The American View is a weekly one-hour program that addresses current events and issues from the perspective that America’s roots stem from God, the traditional family and a Constitutional Republic.
  • Rhett & Link: If you’re looking for a few minutes of escape from your world of random muggings, over-processed foods, and glacial melting, you’ve definitely come to the right place. A place where Rhett&Link film things, sing things, and say things. Enjoy.
  • The White Horse Inn : The White Horse Inn is a nationally syndicated radio talk show hosted by
    Michael Horton, Rod Rosenbladt, Kim Riddlebarger and Ken Jones. On the air since 1990, the show features a regular roundtable discussion of Christian theology and apologetics.
  • CARM Podcast : CARM is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization whose purpose is to equip Christians and refute error. The faith once for all delivered to the saints is under attack all over the world. More and more we need to know the truth and be able to articulate it.

I’m always looking for others that will feed my heart, mind, and soul. Are there any others you can recommend?

Powered by ScribeFire.

John Piper: A Challenge for Young People

In Uncategorized on May 22, 2007 at 5:41 pm


We had our graduate recognition service yesterday at church. This video really helps capture what I pray will happen with our young people.

For Political Junkies, YouTube is Where It’s At

In Politics on May 21, 2007 at 9:59 pm

pic_youtubelogo_123×63.gifConventional wisdom says that preachers who blog about politics are committing vocational suicide. Well, I don’t think this is a dangerous post, so here goes.

I confess that I enjoy politics. Our United States Constitution fascinates me. After the 2004 election, I grew disillusioned — so much so, that I went and registered as an Independent. Not only for the reason I just mentioned, but also for the fact that I am a pastor. Occasionally I preach, and folks from one party or the other accuse me of sounding like someone from their rival party — so I avoid any conflict of interest and say, “I’m not registered either party — I’m just preaching the truth of God’s Word.”

I have very basic cable, so I don’t get C-Span or CNN or FoxNews — so what’s a political junkie to do besides listen to John McLaughlin yell at me and everyone in the McLaughlin Group on PBS?

YouTube, baby!

I have had the chance to watch the debates — most recently the Republican debates in South Carolina back on May 15. You know, the one where Congressman Dr. Ron Paul (R-Tx) and Rudy Guiliani got into it about the causes of 9/11 (then when Ron Paul and Sean Hannidy of Hannidy and Colmes got into it about the same issue).

As I preached on this past Sunday as we looked at Acts 17:16-34, we have to know our culture and know the message of the resurrection so we can bridge the gap with our understanding of both sides of the bridge. Watching the political wranglings in a way help me to do that. But the Internet has brought such drastic changes — even since the 2000 election. Lesser known candidates such as Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo, Duncan Hunter are able to be heard just as clearly as Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, and John McCain. In fact, Ron Paul now has more subscribers to his YouTube channel than anyone — even Barack Obama.

Who do you like in this election? I will not state my position, but I’ll be happy to let you know off-site and why. Let’s keep it civil — and tell us what you like about the candidate, not what you dislike about another. And no Bush-bashing — he is our President and Commander-in-Chief of our Armed Forces. God commands us to honor him and pray for him. Any derrogatory comments about any candidate or our President will be quickly removed.

For Political Junkies, YouTube is Where It’s At

In Politics on May 21, 2007 at 9:59 pm

pic_youtubelogo_123×63.gifConventional wisdom says that preachers who blog about politics are committing vocational suicide. Well, I don’t think this is a dangerous post, so here goes.

I confess that I enjoy politics. Our United States Constitution fascinates me. After the 2004 election, I grew disillusioned — so much so, that I went and registered as an Independent. Not only for the reason I just mentioned, but also for the fact that I am a pastor. Occasionally I preach, and folks from one party or the other accuse me of sounding like someone from their rival party — so I avoid any conflict of interest and say, “I’m not registered either party — I’m just preaching the truth of God’s Word.”

I have very basic cable, so I don’t get C-Span or CNN or FoxNews — so what’s a political junkie to do besides listen to John McLaughlin yell at me and everyone in the McLaughlin Group on PBS?

YouTube, baby!

I have had the chance to watch the debates — most recently the Republican debates in South Carolina back on May 15. You know, the one where Congressman Dr. Ron Paul (R-Tx) and Rudy Guiliani got into it about the causes of 9/11 (then when Ron Paul and Sean Hannidy of Hannidy and Colmes got into it about the same issue).

As I preached on this past Sunday as we looked at Acts 17:16-34, we have to know our culture and know the message of the resurrection so we can bridge the gap with our understanding of both sides of the bridge. Watching the political wranglings in a way help me to do that. But the Internet has brought such drastic changes — even since the 2000 election. Lesser known candidates such as Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo, Duncan Hunter are able to be heard just as clearly as Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, and John McCain. In fact, Ron Paul now has more subscribers to his YouTube channel than anyone — even Barack Obama.

Who do you like in this election? I will not state my position, but I’ll be happy to let you know off-site and why. Let’s keep it civil — and tell us what you like about the candidate, not what you dislike about another. And no Bush-bashing — he is our President and Commander-in-Chief of our Armed Forces. God commands us to honor him and pray for him. Any derrogatory comments about any candidate or our President will be quickly removed.

Would You Invite People to Your Church? No? Then Why Do You Go There?

In Church Life on May 18, 2007 at 1:04 pm

If it is documented proof that 5 out of every 6 people in our churches attend because someone invited them, then the question follows: “Why do we not invite more people we know to our church?”

I was confronted with this question after reading David Francis’ booklet, Invite: A Six-Lane Strategy to Sunday School. Here’s the paragraph from Chapter One entitled “Invigorate”:

Sadly, a lot of people faithfully attend churches they would never invited someone else to attend. Why is that? One reason is that they may have invested much treasure into the church and their hearts are there, just like Jesus said (Matthew 6:19-24). Often it is because of family ties. For others, important memories are linked to the church. Still others have moved away from the church, and while they continue to make the drive in on Sundays, they don’t really think others who live around them now would make that sacrifice. Some are loyal to a long-time pastor who has walked with them “in good times and bad.” These folks have decided that the reasons for staying in the church — or class — outweight the effort it would take to find and get involved in a new one. The business term for this is switching cost. It’s why you continue to go to the grocery store that carries your favorite ice cream, or the hardware store with the friendly folks, or the stylyst who has been cutting your hair for years, or the dry cleaner who occasionally messes up your order. You know the people. You know the routine. You know where to find stuff. Maybe a newer store is in town. Maybe the old store looks a little run down or the neighborhood is changing, but the cost of finding a new one — in terms of familiarity, time and relationships — is too high by comparison. At least for now. But do you tell other people about the business like you used to? Maybe you do; maybe you don’t. It doesn’t affect where you spend your money, but it may affect where you encourage others to spend their time. (pp. 7-8)

This struck me because I had one of our older members come up to me and say recently, “I’m so glad you’re here, Bro. Matt — now I feel like I can invite people to our church and know they will hear what they need to hear.”  With the implication being, “I come, yes, but I did not feel comfortable inviting others to come.”  That’s very telling, isn’t it?

What are your thoughts? Would we invite people to our particular churches? Why or why not? If you were a newcomer to your church, would you see things differently that you would in your present situation? In essence, what do you think of this article?

Powered by ScribeFire.

Taliban Tells Pakistani Christians: Convert or Die (FoxNews.com)

In Politics, Religious Liberties, Religious Organizations on May 17, 2007 at 10:45 am

An excerpt from the article:

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — Christians in a Pakistani town beset by pro-Taliban militants sought government protection Wednesday, the eve of a deadline for them to convert to Islam or face violence.

About 500 Pakistani Christians in Charsadda, a town in the North West Frontier Province bordering Afghanistan, received letters earlier this month telling them to close their churches and convert by Thursday or be the target of “bomb explosions.”

Several Christians, a tiny minority in the predominantly Muslim country, have fled town and others are living in fear, community leaders said.

Some complained that police were not taking the threat seriously.

“Police say someone is joking with us by writing these letters,” Chaudhry Salim, a Charsadda Christian leader, said during a news conference in Islamabad. “They have deployed only two policemen at our churches … this is the kind of security we are getting now.”

(Click here to read the rest of the article.)

Powered by ScribeFire.

Seminary Students Know Everything, Right? (From the Archives — 2.1.06)

In For Seminary Students on May 16, 2007 at 10:43 am

It seems too often some seminary students seem to feel they are an authority on everything! How does this come to be? Does being accepted into a school of graduate level academics cause one’s head to swell with pride and grand a feeling of elitism? Does being in seminary mean that someone has attained the ’super-spiritual status’? Does hob-nobbing with world-class seminary professors who know you on a first name basis when they see you in the hall bestow upon you some great inside track into the evangelical world?

It’s easy to let happen, that’s for sure — and it is something that we must guard against. I know that I’ve seen this happen in various blogs and articles written by seminary students that show this type of elitism. Mr. and Mrs. Grammar and all their offspring tend to lurk these pages in SBTS blogdom, and often feel it necessary to correct misspellings and misuses of terms and various phraseologies. One friend of mine had a seminarian (actually, he hadn’t started yet) who felt the need to chastise him over a misspelling of Samuel Alito’s name (he spelled it Olito). Here is what he wrote:

Sorry. I saw you misspelled the recent Supreme Court nominee’s name “Olito” and I was unable to read the rest of your post. I have become like my curmudgeony old History professor who said, “If I get hung up on your grammar or usage, I can’t even evaluate your argument.” of correcting papers. I will try in my mind to substitute “Alito” and reread your posting.

If this fellow was an old history professor, maybe. If this fellow was actually grading a paper, then I would understand. But this is an almost fellow seminarian who, rather than saying, “Good post! Just thought you might want to know, but his name is spelled with an “A” rather than an “O” — otherwise, a good post!” — he speaks this. We have to be careful of eminating an aura of elitism even amongst our peers.

Now, contrast that with a mistake I made and then see the response:

Thanks for the plug. Small correction: the blog is Provocations and Pantings. Not a big deal calling it Panderings, especially since I get ragged by my friends as “Provocations and Panties.”

See what a difference in approach makes? “Timmy” corrected me, but mixed in a word of gratitude sprinkled with humor (I actually laughed out loud).

Having said all that, let me say this. Having graduated from a Bible college in 1994 (Palm Beach Atlantic University) and twice from Southern Seminary (M.C.M. in 1997, M.Div in 2003 — currently pursuing a D.Min. in Expository Preaching), I certainly felt a sense of accomplishment. But that lasted for about five seconds. Heaven knows that I would not have gone to seminary had not God explicitly laid that calling upon my life. I ran from His calling for years — desiring to attain my accounting degree then pursue my theological studies. But when God called, He actually expected me to respond immediately, not on my timetable. So off I went to college, then to seminary. Every day I am out of seminary is another day I realize that I do not know hardly anything at all! Books? Yes. But do I know my God? Do I love those around me? Do I truly understand the inner workings of my own heart?

I began to see that I really know very little and I need to get to work to know my God, love my people, and to guard my heart.

But I believe the battle over one’s pride and other areas of fleshly behavior really come to the forefront at seminary. Seminary, for all its wonders, is a very lonely place even when surrounded by 2000+ other students (as is the case at Southern). If you take a full-load (12-15 hours), you spend the majority of your time studying … and studying … and studying. And after a while, it begins to wear on the average person.

One of the first things I noticed when I first came to seminary was the fact that very few people walking down the hallways looked happy. They didn’t even look content — not even close. Very few said ‘hi’ unless they knew you. At first, I didn’t understand, but now I do — seminary, for all its wonders (have I said that already), is a lonely place and very hard work. When one first arrives on campus, one may feel they have reached the zenith of their spiritual walk. But many leave disillusioned because the vibrancy of a once active spiritual life has been relegated to mere academia, mere knowledge-crunching, a mere exercise in short-term memory on the highest level to get by on tests.

Seminary, if we are not careful, can turn even the most outgoing student inward. We cocoon ourselves from outward distractions so none of those Greek words we’ve worked so hard to parse leak out of our porous brains. We wrap ourselves up so we can remember the birth and death dates of Benjamin Keach and the advent of the Philadelphia Baptist Association. As a music student, I barracaded myself in my dorm room and the piano practice room for two days prior to Dr. McElrath’s hymnology exam so I wouldn’t forget the 50+ hymn tunes I needed to know for the upcoming test.

What’s the solution? First, to remember 1 Corinthians 1:26-31:

For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth. [27] But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong; [28] God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are, [29] so that no human being might boast in the presence of God. [30] He is the source of your life in Christ Jesus, whom God made our wisdom and our righteousness and sanctification and redemption. [31] Therefore, as it is written, “Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.”

God places His calling on the ones that the world deems unfit. Yet, it seems that even with this we want to seem ‘fit’ before the world. We should desire to be ‘fit’ before God rather than strutting around our gifts and talents so the world will notice. The Pharisees did this, and they had their reward of applause than immediately came (Matthew 6:1-8).

Secondly, as seminary students, love one another and take care of one another. When you walk down the hallway, smile and say hello to someone! That may be the first encouraging thing they have heard in days because their seminary classes and other relationships may have been burying them in a heap! If you see someone sitting alone in the cafeteria, pull up a chair and have lunch with them and start a conversation! Help bear the burdens of one another (Galatians 6:2). Do something for someone else, rather than spend all your time telling of how well you are doing in your classes. That may come up, but we are called to build up one another in Christ (Ephesians 4:11-16). We can speak the truth (like the fellow who pointed out that Alito was spelled with an ‘A’), but make sure the truth is spoken with love! We will learn the truth at seminary, but we must seek God with all our heart to help us maintain the attitude of love in our hearts toward Him and others!

Powered by ScribeFire.

Jerry Falwell (1933-2007)

In Uncategorized on May 16, 2007 at 9:12 am

Yesterday, Dr. Jerry Falwell, President of Liberty University and Pastor of the Thomas Road Baptist Church — both in the city of my birth, Lynchburg, VA — passed from this life into a better, grander life as he entered into the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ. 

I found out about the news when my minister of music called me and said that they found him unconscious.  He has some strong ties because his youngest daughter is graduating from Liberty this weekend.  In fact, I wrote his daughter a note of encouragement on her facebook account:

Dear _____________ :

Your mom forwarded me a picture of you and Dr. Falwell and it really helped put in perspective how you all at Liberty must be feeling. We had a beloved professor pass away at college and our concert choir had to be a part of that funeral. THAT was hard. But losing your president and such an influential evangelical as Dr. Falwell was (is!) — you guys are in our prayers. When you graduate, I know it will be quite difficult going through the ceremonies which are supposed to be so uplifting. When down, just thank God that he allowed Dr. Falwell to plant such an incredible ministry at college and in our country and that you got to be a part of it.

Just for what it’s worth!

While I have posted other articles lamenting some of Dr. Falwell’s comments, but I admire his courage in exposing the evils in our culture and seeking to expunge them from our country. I’m not sure going the political route is best — too much ends up being compromised in the process. At least he stood true to his biblical convictions.

Powered by ScribeFire.

So Fewer are Enrolling as Music Majors at our Seminaries? I Know Why (Part III: A Resolution)

In Church Life, Worship on May 14, 2007 at 1:52 pm

As promised, this will be the last post of my observations (such as they are) concerning the reason why enrollment is down at our seminaries’ music schools and exactly what type of resolution should be made.

But first, I feel I need to clear up some comments I made. One of my deacons who has been at Boone’s Creek since the late 30s read my blog and took umbrage with one particular paragraph:

I believe that if we are to be a Great Commission Church, we need to not only be trained in our seminaries in the classical genres in order to hone our musical skills to the glory of God (Psalm 33:3 — which I will deal with in the next blog), we need to understand how to minister with this vehicle of music in our particular ministry setting.

At the same time, I believe that we must also help our church members come out of their rut of liking a set of hymns that they could sing backwards, forwards, and sideways and expose them to hymns with great music and great theological meat.   In other words, sing something great that says something great!

The issue he had was that it seemed as if I wanted to do away with hymns and instead replace it with some other type of music. My apologies — that most certainly was not my mindset. My aim was to get out of the rut of liking a set of hymns which we tend to sing over and over out of comfort. Rather, we should be willing to learn new songs (hymns or choruses) that convey great thoughts about God and His Son coupled with great music as well.

What do I mean by “great?” I mean done well, to the best of the abilities God has given to you. In other words, strive for excellence. Strive for what is best in the setting to which God has called you.

Another comment came from Philip who is a graduate of Southern Seminary (we actually attended Southern at the same time, he pursuing his DMA, I pursuing my MCM). 

I think it is incredibly sad that worship leaders don’t have the
ability to read music anymore. The comment from dbrowneph4, that is
worship leader “doesn’t read music” and that they “don’t use hymns”
tells you why the enrollment is down in seminaries–the church has left
traditional music. Now, maybe you applaud that, but I deplore it.
Classically trained musicians don’t have a place in the Southern
Baptist Church anymore.

I grieve that I came across as “applauding” the notion that this worship leader doesn’t use hymns.  I’m not so concerned that the church has “left traditional music,” but that the church is turning it’s back on its heritage.  For many, just because a hymn is deemed ‘old’ means that it should never be used.  Being traditional or being new should never be the standard — being obedient and doctrinally sound should be the standard, be it hymns or choruses.  To simply discard one or the other solely based on style or emotional appeal (or lack thereof) is incredibly short-sighted and deprives your people of the hymns from our past, and from the songs being given now.  We must be careful not to overgeneralize.

Here’s the question:  Should we encourage our young musicians called into the music ministry to pursue a seminary education?  Some took my comments and said, “Thanks for encouraging me not to pursue seminary education.”  That was too strong a conclusion to come to.  Should you, though?

In short, yes.

Yet I suspect you would like for me to elaborate. Why would I encourage them? The same reason why I would tell someone who is called into the preaching ministry to attend seminary.

First, they teach you to do your calling with discipline and excellence. I could play piano pretty well before I went to seminary. Even played in the church. Even led choir and congregational hymns. I thought I had all I needed. Then I went to seminary and was taught

  • how to practice;
  • how to understand the intention of the composer;
  • how to understand the historical background and culture in which the piece was written;
  • the rudiments of music theory so my eyes and ears were on the same page (musicians know what I’m talking about).

Sounds like exegetical work for the preacher, does it not?  Same animal.  And that’s honestly just the beginning. 

Secondly, you find yourselves exposed to God-gifted composers and arrangers to help you climb the lofty heights of musical expression and possibilities.  I could have cared less about J.S. Bach or Mozart before I went to college and seminary to study it therein.  Then I tried to play and compose and found it such a difficult task.  Then I listened to Bach and Mozart and Chopin and began to appreciate their gifts and talents and began to understand why they are still appreciated 200-300 years later.  And by being surrounded by those greats, it inspired you to be better and to advance the gifts that God has given you.

We read and put together sermons and write for our congregations in trying to express some doctrinal or devotional area of the Christian life.  But then we read John Calvin, or Luther, or Edwards — or even today of the John Pipers, John MacArthurs, D.A. Carsons, etc.  We begin to breathe in that great air that God blessed them with and it inspires us to dig deeper into the treasure trove of God’s Word and drives us to a deeper desire to be deep and clear about preaching and teaching His Word. 

Conclusion

What’s the resolution?  First, to the seminaries.

Don’t simply rely on your reputation to draw another generation of music students.  Make your case.  Tell the music student who desires to lead a congregation in worship why a classical education of studying European composers and their history and their music and their culture matters.  It does — more than we ever give it credit for.  Music reflects the culture and culture reflects the music — we have to understand that these piece have endured for a reason.  They have endured because they stand as a tribute to excellence! 

Now, to the prospective students. 

Don’t simply settle in your own musical abilities — always strive to improve and learn from others who have made that journey.  One person made the comment that their particular worship leader did not even read music.  Praise God that God has given him that ear — but he will be limited and hit the proverbial wall in his leadership.  It would be the same as if a preacher stood up, yet noting that the preacher could not read His Bible.  I have known preachers who could preach but could not read, but they would hit the wall in how they could grow. 

Can God use anyone with any particular breed of education?  Yes!  But if God opens up the opportunity to learn from the best His kingdom has to offer, then take advantage of it.  But as music ministers, never separate your gifts or your particular ‘ministry’ from the people to whom you minister. 

Powered by ScribeFire.

So Fewer are Enrolling as Music Majors at our Seminaries? I Know Why (Part II)

In Church Life, Worship on May 12, 2007 at 8:46 pm

Yesterday, I left off with this paragraph:

Tomorrow I will blog on what the average church member may think of classically-trained music ministers. Do they encourage further training to help them keep their skills up, or do many passively discourage them in order to play music “of the people”? I believe this is where the bridge must be crossed and a dialogue must occur in order to have greater understanding of why music schools in our seminaries are suffering.

To gain an understanding of the falling enrollment figures, one needs to start looking at the people sitting in the pews of the local church. When I was in seminary getting my church music degree, I also was Minister of Music in a rural church in Kentucky. Whereas I was trained in classical literature and, as I said previously, would spend hours working through Bach, Chopin, Debussy, and all the other classic composers of days gone by, my people were listening to Southern Gospel music. What’s the point?

For one, Southern Gospel music (as well as all other popular forms) has a beat. You can tap your foot to them. And even if you cannot tap your foot to them (since some songs are slow), you can connect with them on a heartbeat level because this music is speaking the language of the people.

Secondly, the melodies are quite repetitious. Most of the songs on the radio and even in the choruses we sing are repetitious. Take for instance a classic chorus, “As the Deer.” The first, second, and fourth lines of the song are all the same melody. There’s a variation in line three. Most of our hymns are that way.When you get into classical music, you get very few toe-tappers.

Thirdly, there is a cultural aspect as well.   Southern Gospel music speaks the ‘language’ of that culture where they are.  In other areas of the country, there is a certain style that speaks to the language and cultural setting of that area.  Yet in seminary, I was learning 17th, 18th, and 19th century European Baroque, Classical, Romantic, Impressionistic, and early American music (an experience I wouldn’t trade for the world — more on that in my next blog entry).  Immediately, there is a cultural divide.  Whereas many of these composers were in fact exploring the cultural languages in which they lived, they were also exploring all of the musical possibilities as well.  As a result, they are exceedingly difficult even to the trained mind — but are unattainable to the average member in the church.

So there is a cultural divide.   Most of those who enjoy classical music (or jazz, for that matter) have a basic knowledge of music theory and a genuine appreciation for the composer’s genius and the composition process. It would be like me looking at a building and saying, “Mmm… that’s a nice building.” Then an architect coming along and saying, “Wow, did you notice how this and this and this and this was put together? What a genius this guy was!” You have to have an eye or an ear for it.  It comes with training and experience.

I believe that if we are to be a Great Commission Church, we need to not only be trained in our seminaries in the classical genres in order to hone our musical skills to the glory of God (Psalm 33:3 — which I will deal with in the next blog), we need to understand how to minister with this vehicle of music in our particular ministry setting.

At the same time, I believe that we must also help our church members come out of their rut of liking a set of hymns that they could sing backwards, forwards, and sideways and expose them to hymns with great music and great theological meat.   In other words, sing something great that says something great!

What’s the point?  This applies to preachers as well:  know where your people are and gently take them where they need to be.  Love them, appreciate them, gain their trust, then guide them like the shepherd God has you to be.

So what good are seminaries for concerning worship leaders?  Much.  Check back tomorrow.

Tom Ascol’s Desire for “Integrity in Church Membership”

In Church Life on May 11, 2007 at 1:44 pm

An excerpt from his Founders’ Ministries Blog:

As promised, I have submitted my resolution on integrity in church membership to the Resolutions Committee for the 2007 Southern Baptist Convention. From what I understand, others may well submit similar resolutions this year.

Before sending my resolution in, I consulted with a few respected leaders in the Southern Baptist Convention. I sent each a copy of what I intended to propose. All were very favorable about the concerns addressed and offered advice. One encouraged me to wait a year or two before submitting the resolution in hopes that the convention might be better prepared for such a dialogue at that time. I understand and respect his reasoning, but decided to go ahead with my original plan.

I am very gratified to see more and more people giving serious attention to the issue of ecclesiology in general and Baptist polity in particular. In case you missed you, you really must read the Baptist Press story on John Hammett’s recent faculty lecture at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary. He is a professor of theology at the school and spoke on the need to recover our commitment to a regenerate church membership. Here is a summary statement from the article:

(Click here to read the rest of this well-written article and proposal.)

Powered by ScribeFire.

Tom Ascol’s Desire for “Integrity in Church Membership”

In Church Life on May 11, 2007 at 1:44 pm

An excerpt from his Founders’ Ministries Blog:

As promised, I have submitted my resolution on integrity in church membership to the Resolutions Committee for the 2007 Southern Baptist Convention. From what I understand, others may well submit similar resolutions this year.

Before sending my resolution in, I consulted with a few respected leaders in the Southern Baptist Convention. I sent each a copy of what I intended to propose. All were very favorable about the concerns addressed and offered advice. One encouraged me to wait a year or two before submitting the resolution in hopes that the convention might be better prepared for such a dialogue at that time. I understand and respect his reasoning, but decided to go ahead with my original plan.

I am very gratified to see more and more people giving serious attention to the issue of ecclesiology in general and Baptist polity in particular. In case you missed you, you really must read the Baptist Press story on John Hammett’s recent faculty lecture at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary. He is a professor of theology at the school and spoke on the need to recover our commitment to a regenerate church membership. Here is a summary statement from the article:

(Click here to read the rest of this well-written article and proposal.)

Powered by ScribeFire.

So Fewer are Enrolling as Music Majors at our Seminaries? I Know Why

In Church Life, Worship on May 11, 2007 at 10:32 am

Dr. Mohler of Southern Seminary recently noted that enrollment in our music schools at our seminaries are down significantly over the past few years.  As one who graduated from Southern’s School of Music (M.C.M., 1997:  Church Music Major, Emphasis in Piano), and now having been in ministry since 1992 both as a minister of music and as a pastor, I believe I can speak to why enrollment is down.

Most of our seminaries’ music schools are modeled after conservatory curriculum.  At seminary, you will study hymnology, church music literature, conducting and choral techniques.  As a pianist, I would spend hours learning a piece by Bach, Chopin, Brahms, and Debussy.  Vocalists would learn other classical pieces as well.  Electives would include areas such as composition, transcription, church music drama, arranging, etc. 

To Southern’s credit, they have begun some classes such as “Leadership in Contemporary Expressions of Corporate Worship.” 

When one looks at the state of contemporary worship in our churches, then looks at our seminaries’ curriculum, some work needs to be done.  When many of our worship services are led by guitars, drums, and other electrical instruments which are more in line with what one hears on the radio, they may question the necessity for coming to seminary to be a worship leader and learning how

  • to conduct a choir (many churches now simply have praise teams);
  • study hymnology (many churches work overtime to divorce themselves from the constraints of the past — which is what the ‘hymns’ represent);
  • learn to sing or play classical pieces (what ministry would most people see in having someone play a Bach Prelude and Fuge or a Brahms Intermezzo for a worship service?)

Many simply see the need to lead in a spiritual manner with passion — whereas learning music in an academic setting seems to diffuse the passion that music should help arouse!  For many, it just doesn’t seem to fit with being a worship leader.

Our seminary music schools will have to rethink some issues.  I am not necessarily advocating doing away with all things historical and classical (my next blog will show the cruciality of having these areas in place).  I am advising them to make a stronger case than they have been.

Fortunately, many of our seminary music professors are among the best trained musicians our country has to offer.  I’m thankful they are serving the Kingdom of God.  Yet, I believe the danger is that since they have been surrounded from an early time in that conservatory, academic mindset that they fail to take seriously the mindsets of those worship leaders in our churches who have their own mindsets of what worship should be.  The temptation is to look at the quality of music played and taught at seminary and then simply look at the quality of the music played in our average church and look no further — “Our quality is better, therefore this is the level of quality every serious minister of music should attain.”

Tomorrow, I will blog on what the average church member may think of classically-trained music ministers.  Do they encourage further training to help them keep their skills up, or do many passively discourage them in order to play music “of the people”?  I believe this is where the bridge must be crossed and a dialogue must occur in order to have greater understanding of why music schools in our seminaries are suffering.

What think ye?

Powered by ScribeFire.

Is Plagiarism Acceptable in Preaching?

In For Preachers/Pastors, For Seminary Students, Preaching, Sermons on May 8, 2007 at 9:07 pm

Michael Duduit stimulated some of my thinking on this subject in his recent e-newsletter of PreachingNow. He begins by stating:

Any time I include a comment or excerpt in PreachingNow that touches on plagiarism, I get lots of notes from pastors. (Click here to see last week’s issue.) Some sincerely wonder where the lines are drawn — what is “stealing” and what is honest research? Others bristle at the very concept of plagiarism, insisting that everything should be “fair game” and that there is nothing wrong with using someone else’s sermon (even preaching the whole thing verbatim) if the original author doesn’t care.

He is right in how he represents both sides. I used to belong to a forum online which would share outlines of the sermons which we were to preach the coming Sunday. Some found them stimulating to their own study. Others would confess that they would use the outlines (points, subpoints, and sub-subpoints and all) under the pretense that there was “nothing new under the sun,” so it was permissable to simply preaching verbatim a sermon already preached by a fellow brother.

Soon after, I unsubscribed from that forum because I just felt it was too easy a temptation to simply take that outline and run with it. Ultimately I could not. Why? I just could not pass off as my own something that God gave someone else. I was using the fruit of another’s prayer, study, and sweat! Here what Dr. Duduit says on this matter:

If I did that in the business world or in higher education I’d be fired. Do we think preaching has less ethical demands than the secular world? Deception is deception, whatever the context. . . . It cheats the congregation of the anointed passion that comes from a God-called messenger working through the biblical text to uncover the truth God has for that congregation that day. Our congregations deserve better than generic, off-the-shelf sermons.

For me, it is an integrity issue. God has called me to be a vessel through which his Word is preached. For me to stand up and pass off as our own circumvents our calling. Instead of looking to God for a message, we look on the internet or other sources. However helpful those sources and sermons may be, we pass ourselves off as frauds and phonies. We betray the confidence and trust of our people.

Some closing thoughts from Dr. Duduit:

If God called you to be an actor or performer, then people expect you to perform scripts written by others. But when a congregation hears a preacher stand before them to present a message from God, they expect that person to have prayed and studied and struggled through to find the message God has for them. And I believe that is what God calls us to do. Why would we settle for less?

Amen.

Any thoughts? Any of you out there who believe that I am off my bean? Make your case!

(Information from Preaching Now, Vol. 6, no. 16 — May 8, 2007).

Why is the Western Church Declining? Outdated Modes of Doing Church

In Church Life, Evangelism, Missions on May 8, 2007 at 2:14 pm

A great article from the goodmanson blog. Here’s an excerpt:

The Western Church is in decline. Part of the challenge is the church is stuck in old models of ecclesiology based on Constantinian views of church. The church is seen as a power structure seeking to ‘attract’ people from the outside to join. This model is set to fail to change our culture, as author Alan Hirsch puts it:

A combination of recent research in Australia indicates that about 10-15 percent of that population is attracted to what we call the contemporary church growth model.

In other words, this model has significant “market appeal” to about 12 percent of our population. The more successful forms of this model tend to be large, highly professionalized, and overwhelmingly middle class, and express themselves culturally using contemporary, “seeker friendly” language and middle-of-the-road music forms. (source: The Forgotten Ways)

In America, we may have a couple decades before we reach the 10-15 percent. Yet churches continue to try to one-up each other to create better programs, funnier messages, more creative marketing to capture people from this pool of seekers.

For example, Outreach magazine’s June 2007 issue reported a seemingly encouraging statistic: 97% of Protestant churches reported doing something evangelistic within the year. (Source: Ellison Research’s “Facts and Trends“) It was only when you dig deeper, the stat loses some punch:

  • 70% did a Vacation Bible School
  • 59% passed out literature such as tracts or magazines
  • 56% held large events such as block parties and fall festivals

These are good things to do, but all of these are attractional-based evangelism that will reach people who share a similar worldview to Christians. Meaning, when people hold a similar morality, view of absolutes and
typically conservative background these events are effective. For most others, they are ineffective.

(To read the rest and see his very viable solution, click here. HT: Mark Combs, once again)

Powered by ScribeFire.

Who Would EVER Want to Be President of the United States?

In Uncategorized on May 7, 2007 at 2:57 pm

Have you noticed how most presidents look as if they have aged 25 years during their four or eight year presidencies? I was noticing this with President Bush. Look at him in 2001:

Look at him in 2007:

What about Bush’s predecessor, Bill Clinton? Take a look. Here he is in 1993:

Here he is leaving office:

The last two-termer before Clinton was President Ronald Reagan who served from 1981-1989. Here he is in 1981:

Here he is in 1989:

The strains and stresses that come from such a visible and high power job make me never want to attain a childhood dream as President. God has me right where he wants me, I’d say.

powered by performancing firefox

I Was Ordained into the Gospel Ministry Nine Years Ago — But as a Music Minister?

In Church Life, Worship on May 5, 2007 at 10:35 pm

On May 3, 1998, by God’s sovereign grace I was ordained into the Gospel ministry at the First Baptist Church of Clewiston, Florida. I remember going through a fairly rigorous questioning about all of my doctrinal beliefs and spiritual practices. Though at the time, I was called into the music ministry, they wisely understood how ministering in this way is a form of preaching the Gospel. No, not in sermonic form, but we did preach nonetheless.

Notice a passage of Scripture in 1 Chronicles 25. David was organizing the various ministries of the Temple worship. Notice the first two verses:

David and the chiefs of the service also set apart for the service the sons of Asaph, and of Heman, and of Jeduthun, who prophesied with lyres, with harps, and with cymbals. The list of those who did the work and of their duties was: [2] Of the sons of Asaph: Zaccur, Joseph, Nethaniah, and Asharelah, sons of Asaph, under the direction of Asaph, who prophesied under the direction of the king (1 Chron. 25:1-2, ESV).

I remembered being asked by an elderly woman when I first surrendered to the ministry, “Are you going to be a music minister or a ‘minister’ minister?” They saw being a music minister as second-rate behind being a preacher of the Word.

While I do believe that preaching is the highest calling one can receive, I believe it is wrong to say that being ‘just’ a music minister lags way behind. David called skilled musicians whose main purpose was not to rock someone’s face off, but to prophesy the Word of the Lord. Even in music ministry, the preaching of the Word is primary — and often neglected.

I may begin a series of music ministry posts — especially since I am a pastor now. I’d appreciate your prayers.

Is Mormonism Mainstream Now, Or Are People Still Suspicious?

In Apologetics, Church Life, Culture, Politics, Religious Organizations, Theology on May 5, 2007 at 9:36 pm

Albert Mohler of Southern Seminary addresses “Evangelicals, Mormons on the Same Side of Cultural Divide.” Here’s an excerpt:

Is Mormonism now a part of the American mainstream? That question raises a host of issues — including the question of what constitutes the “mainstream” now anyway?

There are two questions here. One has to do with the status of Mormonism, the second with the definition of the mainstream.

I must answer the Mormon question first, and from two perspectives. As an evangelical Christian theologian, I must clarify that Mormonism is in no way consistent with orthodox Christianity. It borrows Christian themes and texts, but its most basic beliefs directly contradict the central teachings of Christianity.

Read the entire article here. Well worth it!

powered by performancing firefox

Mark Driscoll, Reformed Loose Cannon — I Am Officially Off the Bandwagon

In Church Life, For Preachers/Pastors, For Seminary Students, Missions, Preaching on May 2, 2007 at 2:15 pm

By now, you may have seen the video by Mark Driscoll and the Acts 29 Network which deals with church planting. So much good stuff in this video (as in all of his sermons). And he rightly notes that the least likely age group to come to church are men in their 20s.

But good grief! I want to like this guy’s ministry… I want to promote his ministry to my people but just can’t … I want to even be an admirer and supporter of his hip, cool, trendy, shocking style of preaching (a switch, considering that I preach in a traditional, Southern Baptist Church in the buckle of the Bible belt).

But I just can’t.

Today marks the day I am officially off the bandwagon. I just have such difficulty sifting the beauties and majesties of the truths he preaches from God’s Word from the sophomoric jargon he uses as a vehicle to carry along his point. At first, I liked his candor — now it embarrasses me. He is a Reformed loose cannon who bends over backwards to be edgy and his message of the cross of Christ and its offensiveness to the world’s cursed worldview is buried in another type of offensiveness — his presentation.

An alternative? Tim Keller. He is informed on the culture, presents his message with clarity and heart, and most importantly, I can in good conscience give one of his messages to one of my deacons or one of my On-Mission Team members at church.

What frightens me most is that there are many who may try to style themselves after Driscoll. Be careful if you do — speaking the truth in love still applies, last I checked (Ephesians 4:15). Regardless of his motives, he comes off too much as a loose cannon to convey a passionate love for his people and his city.

What think ye?

powered by performancing firefox

I’m All For Humor … But To a Point

In Church Life, For Preachers/Pastors, For Seminary Students, Preaching on May 2, 2007 at 9:24 am

Yesterday, my wife and I had the privilege of going to a preview of a Gary Chapman conference to be held in Cincinnati.  We had a terrific time and were treated very graciously by the host church.  Yet, during our luncheon, I was reacquainted with a particular truth that all who are leaders (especially preachers of the Gospel) would do well to remember:

If you have to get a laugh at someone else’s expense, it’s just not funny

I say this as one who grew up on the Three Stooges where Moe would poke, prod, smack, and insult — calling Larry a “porcupine,” or calling Curly a “mutton head” (nyuk, nyuk, nyuk).  I grew up on All in the Family where Archie would call his son-in-law “Meathead” and call everyone else everything else. 

But the older I get, the more I see the power of words and the power they have to break down relationships.  Psalm 140:1-3 says, ”

   Deliver me, O Lord, from evil men;
        preserve me from violent men,
   who plan evil things in their heart
        and stir up wars continually.
   They make their tongue sharp as a serpent’s,
        and under their lips is the venom of asps.  Selah

Sharp and venomous are words ill-spoken.  And damaging — but not simply to those who receive these words, but also to those who speak them as well. 

You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.’  But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire.

Granted, the motive behind these words is anger — but these words carry a big punch for them to be recognized as used with that motive.  When we think we can say hurtful things and think that a simple smile can overcome it all and make it better, we have to reconsider.  The words will still sting.

I’ve seen too many preachers — from the pulpit even! — who use some and jokingly prod them about something foolish they did or some trait they have and use it to generate a laugh.  I told my ministry students last night that this is not appropriate for the minister of God.  You may be loved when you say these things, but one day something may come up where they will question something you did — then all those things you said ‘jokingly’ will begin to carry more weight.  Then they will wonder how serious you were!  As Dr. Tim Beougher of Southern Seminary told us in preaching class, “If you have people shooting at you, don’t give them bullets!”  Oh, how words can serve as those bullets.

So again, if you have to get a laugh at someone else’s expense, then don’t do it.  Find other creative ways to lighten the heart and build up at the same time.  Sure, lots of TV shows and stand-up comics make a nice living at such a thing…

… but who wants to be Andrew Dice Clay? 

I’ll work on being more like Jesus, thanks.  That’s why he created and saved me to begin with (Romans 8:29-30).

powered by performancing firefox

I’m All For Humor … But To a Point

In Church Life, For Preachers/Pastors, For Seminary Students, Preaching on May 2, 2007 at 9:24 am

Yesterday, my wife and I had the privilege of going to a preview of a Gary Chapman conference to be held in Cincinnati.  We had a terrific time and were treated very graciously by the host church.  Yet, during our luncheon, I was reacquainted with a particular truth that all who are leaders (especially preachers of the Gospel) would do well to remember:

If you have to get a laugh at someone else’s expense, it’s just not funny

I say this as one who grew up on the Three Stooges where Moe would poke, prod, smack, and insult — calling Larry a “porcupine,” or calling Curly a “mutton head” (nyuk, nyuk, nyuk).  I grew up on All in the Family where Archie would call his son-in-law “Meathead” and call everyone else everything else. 

But the older I get, the more I see the power of words and the power they have to break down relationships.  Psalm 140:1-3 says, ”

   Deliver me, O Lord, from evil men;
        preserve me from violent men,
   who plan evil things in their heart
        and stir up wars continually.
   They make their tongue sharp as a serpent’s,
        and under their lips is the venom of asps.  Selah

Sharp and venomous are words ill-spoken.  And damaging — but not simply to those who receive these words, but also to those who speak them as well. 

You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.’  But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire.

Granted, the motive behind these words is anger — but these words carry a big punch for them to be recognized as used with that motive.  When we think we can say hurtful things and think that a simple smile can overcome it all and make it better, we have to reconsider.  The words will still sting.

I’ve seen too many preachers — from the pulpit even! — who use some and jokingly prod them about something foolish they did or some trait they have and use it to generate a laugh.  I told my ministry students last night that this is not appropriate for the minister of God.  You may be loved when you say these things, but one day something may come up where they will question something you did — then all those things you said ‘jokingly’ will begin to carry more weight.  Then they will wonder how serious you were!  As Dr. Tim Beougher of Southern Seminary told us in preaching class, “If you have people shooting at you, don’t give them bullets!”  Oh, how words can serve as those bullets.

So again, if you have to get a laugh at someone else’s expense, then don’t do it.  Find other creative ways to lighten the heart and build up at the same time.  Sure, lots of TV shows and stand-up comics make a nice living at such a thing…

… but who wants to be Andrew Dice Clay? 

I’ll work on being more like Jesus, thanks.  That’s why he created and saved me to begin with (Romans 8:29-30).

powered by performancing firefox